YES.
The second infraction brought an explosion from the judge over the first, and Schroeder again ripped into Binger for potentially violating Rittenhouse’s rights protected under the Constitution.
“I was astonished when you began your examination by commenting on the defendant’s post-arrest silence. That’s basic law. It’s been basic law in this country for 40 years, 50 years. I have no idea why you would do something like that! And it gives, well, I’ll leave it at that. So I don’t know what you’re up to,” Schroeder said.
That's different, the judge is a moron, mentioning your fifth amendment right, isn't violating your fifth amendment right.
The judge had other grounds to rip into the prosecutor for, but the 5th amendment wasn't it.
Just like if Rittenhouse gave a speech, before the trial, that had nothing to do with his case and the prosecutor brought that up during the trial.
Irrelevant and inadmissable.
The Trump cult ISN'T BEING SILENT and are accusing the investigators of committing crimes.
Lies with no traction, are like wheels with no traction.................they're in a holding pattern too.