USDA Inspector General Physically Removed by Security After Refusing to Comply with Her Firing

[cnm]

This is a thing I've noticed. MAGAts weep tears of patriotic emotion over defending the Constitution then applaud a POTUS who ignores it.


The riddle of the poorly educated, I suppose.

 

[X.Onasis]

Congress is the check on the Executive, no one is the boss.

But that's their dream it seems. He hates who they hate. It's poison, but they revel in it.

 

[Contumacious]

The President works for the people, not the other way around.

WHAT THE FUCKETH ?

The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land

He is working for WE THE PEOPLE

not the ones who voted for the cackle queen

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'm sure it has something to do with the Department of Agriculture controlling Ukraine's war funding.

You have got to posting under the influence. That's the stupidest thing posted on the internet today. Off to ignore with you!

 

[cnm]

SCOTUS HAS RULED THAT CONGRESS CAN NOT MODIFY ATICLE II , SECTION 1

Are you saying the POTUS is not required to faithfully execute the law until such law is ruled unconstitutional?


So, POTUS as king. These Constitution ignoring MAGAts are all for that.

No one is surprised.

 

[X.Onasis]

You have got to posting under the influence. That's the stupidest thing posted on the internet today. Off to ignore with you!

Can't read or haven't followed the thread? Fine... Buh bye.

 

[Cougarbear]

Gee, yet another Democrat bureaucrat who believes rules don't apply to her.

She's an insurrectionist! Jail her! 6 years...

 

[Contumacious]

You forget that the President can't modify Article 1. Therefore these inspector general are protected by Article one and the PRESIDENT MUST COMPLY with the requirement set forth by Article One appointees. So the president must give 30 days notice and cause.

Congress is the check on the Executive, no one is the boss.

Yo Vern

write a court brief and tell SCOTUS that the separation of power maxim is bullshit


According to the principle of separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and by extension Congress, cannot directly tell the President what to do in terms of carrying out his executive functions; the Constitution clearly defines distinct powers for each branch of government, preventing one from dictating actions to anothe

 

[cnm]

The President is the boss

All hail His Imperial American Majesty.

 

[Contumacious]

Are you saying the POTUS is not required to faithfully execute the law until such law is ruled unconstitutional?


So, POTUS as king. These Constitution ignoring MAGAts are all for that.

No one is surprised.

IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH HE IS THE KING

UNTIL SUCH TIME AS YOU AND THE CACKLING QUEEN AMEND THE CONSTITUTION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Rigby5]

It is not just that Congress has passed civil service laws that prevent presidents from arbitrarily firing Inspector Generals, but that this is an ancient tradition going back to the Magna Charta and British Common Law.

To legally fire an Inspector General, you have to give Congress 30 days notice so they can conduct a hearing to determine if the firing is valid or not.
The last time this law was modified was in 1976, so is up to date enough.

So anyone forcing any Inspector General out of their office before there has been the 30 day hearing, is a criminal.

 

[yidnar]

Have you ever considered rubbing both brain cells together and finding a fact?

CNM said what he said .. now it is in my sign line for all to see ..no rewriting history for that lefty .. he said it .. and like a good little fellow commie you rush to defend him .

 

[cnm]

Hence " the notion that ,the Congress is to be given 30 days notice and relevant reasons" AINT THE FUCKING LAW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Capisce?

Yet it has not been ruled unconstitutional so it is the law which Chump must faithfully execute.

 

[Contumacious]

QUIC

All hail His Imperial American Majesty.

Move to Canada Vern

 

[X.Onasis]

Are you saying the POTUS is not required to faithfully execute the law until such law is ruled unconstitutional?


So, POTUS as king. These Constitution ignoring MAGAts are all for that.

No one is surprised.

There was no complaining about "dragging them out into the street and shooting them."
I find that a bit disturbing.
Wanting this clusterfuck of a dumpster fire and the buffoon leading, not so much.

 

[cnm]

CNM said what he said .. now it is in my sign line for all to see ..no rewriting history for that lefty .. he said it .. and like a good little fellow commie you rush to defend him .

Oh. I'm honoured. Care to post it so I don't have to turn signatures on?

 

[Contumacious]

Yet it has not been ruled unconstitutional so it is the law which Chump must faithfully execute.

He does NOT need to wait for SCOTUS to rule

the branches of government have CO EQUAL POWERS

BUT SCOTUS HAS ALREADY RULED


Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)

 

[cnm]

I researched. I didn't see anywhere in the Constitution a president couldn't fire an IG

How did you miss he must faithfully execute the law whilst doing so?

 

[yidnar]

Oh. I'm honoured. Care to post it so I don't have to turn signatures on?

treasonous anti American commie !

 

[cnm]

BUT SCOTUS HAS ALREADY RULED

That Chump may fire Inspectors General without faithfully executing the law?

Excerpt the bit of your cite that says that. I'm not trawling through random links you post to make your argument for you.