USDA Inspector General Physically Removed by Security After Refusing to Comply with Her Firing

[EvilCat Breath]

You bet. And she'll win. Is this what you voted for? Dragging civil servants out without due process? What's next on your "accept" list? Dragging a couple out and shooting them to speed up the process? Is that what you voted for?

I would vote for that.

 

[X.Onasis]

CNM said what he said .. now it is in my sign line for all to see ..no rewriting history for that lefty .. he said it .. and like a good little fellow commie you rush to defend him .

He can say what he wants. That's the 1st Amendment supporter in me saying, no matter where in the world he lives.
Besides, he understands US law better than you. Where do you live? Besides in confusion?

 

[Contumacious]

How did you miss he must faithfully execute the law whilst doing so?

How did you miss the rule that that the proviso MUST BE THE LAW

SCOTUS HAS RULED THAT CONGRESS CAN NOT ENCROACH UPON ARTICLE II SECTION I

Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)

Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s leadership by a single Director removable only for inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance violates the separation of powers.

supreme.justia.com

 

[cnm]

treasonous anti American commie !

Oh. I don't remember saying that. How MAGAt, just pulling stuff from their arses.

Anyway, how can I be treasonous? Are you as thick as you appear?

 

[cnm]

How did you miss the rule that that the proviso MUST BE THE LAW

The law has not been ruled unconstitutional, therefore it is constitutional and valid.

I understand laws are matters of choice for poorly educated MAGAts.

 

[yidnar]

Oh. I don't remember saying that. How MAGAt, just pulling stuff from their arses.

Anyway, how can I be treasonous? Are you as thick as you appear?

click the link cnm said ..

 

[Contumacious]

That Chump may fire Inspectors General without faithfully executing the law?

Excerpt the bit of your cite that says that. I'm not trawling through random links you post to make your argument for you.

The Chump can not BUT BUT

The HONORABLE DONALD J TRUMP - THE CONVICT ELECTED BY WE THE PEOPLE -- MAGA PATRIOTS - may fire Inspectors General by merely flicking his fingers

Move to Canada , quickly

 

[X.Onasis]

I would vote for that.

He's your hero isn't he?

 

[yidnar]

He can say what he wants. That's the 1st Amendment supporter in me saying, no matter where in the world he lives.
Besides, he understands US law better than you. Where do you live? Besides in confusion?

and I can say what I want ....and I say that anyone that says The Constitution is one of the worst founding documents is an idiot ! and someone who defends that statement [like you] is also an idiot ..

 

[Contumacious]

The law has not been ruled unconstitutional, therefore it is constitutional and valid.

I understand laws are matters of choice for poorly educated MAGAts.

Yes it has on multiple occassions



"Under our Constitution, the “executive Power”—all of it—is “vested in a President,” who must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Art. II, §1, cl. 1; id., §3. Because no single person could fulfill that responsibility alone, the Framers expected that the President would rely on subordinate officers for assistance. Ten years ago, in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477 (2010), we reiterated that, “as a general matter,” the Constitution gives the President “the authority to remove those who assist him in carrying out his duties,” id., at 513–514. “Without such power, the President could not be held fully accountable for discharging his own responsibilities; the buck would stop somewhere else.” Id., at 514.


We are now asked to extend these precedents to a new configuration: an independent agency that wields significant executive power and is run by a single individual who cannot be removed by the President unless certain statutory criteria are met. We decline to take that step. While we need not and do not revisit our prior decisions allowing certain limitations on the President’s removal power, there are compelling reasons not to extend those precedents to the novel context of an independent agency led by a single Director. Such an agency lacks a foundation in historical practice and clashes with constitutional structure by concentrating power in a unilateral actor insulated from Presidential control.


We therefore hold that the structure of the CFPB violates the separation of powers


Over and out

 

[EvilCat Breath]

He's your hero isn't he?

View attachment 1072430

Absolutely!

 

[Polishprince]

You bet. And she'll win. Is this what you voted for? Dragging civil servants out without due process? What's next on your "accept" list? Dragging a couple out and shooting them to speed up the process? Is that what you voted for?

There was due process. The broad was told she doesn't work there any more, so if she could please leaave.

That the process, give someone a chance to leave on their own accord.

Then if they don't , they have no choice but to get physical.

The 30 days of severance, that will be deposited to her account.

 

[X.Onasis]

and I can say what I want ....and I say that anyone that says The Constitution is one of the worst founding documents is an idiot ! and someone who defends that statement [like you] is also an idiot ..

I defend him as obviously more knowledgeable about American law than you.
That's easy.

 

[X.Onasis]

There was due process. The broad was told she doesn't work there any more, so if she could please leaave.

That the process, give someone a chance to leave on their own accord.

Then if they don't , they have no choice but to get physical.

The 30 days of severance, that will be deposited to her account.

Who said anything about 30 days of severance? Or did you just make that up?

 

[X.Onasis]

Who said anything about 30 days of severance? Or did you just make that up?

And I like your use of "the broad" silly, offensive, descriptor. You pinheads are good at that.

 

[Contumacious]

There was due process. The broad was told she doesn't work there any more, so if she could please leaave.

That the process, give someone a chance to leave on their own accord.

Then if they don't , they have no choice but to get physical.

The 30 days of severance, that will be deposited to her account.

Exactly .

Security was very professional and they didn't let the door hit her in the ass on her way out.

 

[Polishprince]

Who said anything about 30 days of severance? Or did you just make that up?

The policy is a 30 day notice to Congress before the person is removed from the payroll. That's called "severance pay" in the vernacular.

 

[X.Onasis]

Absolutely!

Hey, it's your fantasy, I hear a lot of men like a partner with small hands.

The policy is a 30 day notice to Congress before the person is removed from the payroll. That's called "severance pay" in the vernacular.

Maybe your vernacular.

 

[MarathonMike]

Well, being a lawyer, she probably knows how to file a lawsuit against Trump and seek an injunction.

Did any of the IGs that Obama fired bring a lawsuit against him? Funny how the Media didn't give a shit about it until Trump did it. WOW SHOCKER EH?

 

[yidnar]

I defend him as obviously more knowledgeable about American law than you.
That's easy.

sure commie .. sure .. do you agree with him when he says the Constitution is one of the worst founding documents ?