USDA Inspector General Physically Removed by Security After Refusing to Comply with Her Firing

[Contumacious]

The Trump administration has a pretty strong argument that the notice provision is unconstitutional. The Court has recognized the president’s “unrestricted removal power” over executive branch officials,

He has a SOLID argumwnt

SCOTUS has been ruling like that, pursuant to the Separation of Powers doctrine, for over 200 years.

Let me remind you that as far as the Socialist Demon Rats are concerned the Constitution has been abolished,

 

[X.Onasis]

Let me remind you that as far as the Socialist Demon Rats are concerned the Constitution has been abolished,

Right.
Transference projection is probably your best defense at this point.

 

[Contumacious]

Right.
Transference projection is probably your best defense at this point.

Stonewalling and/or becoming incoherent is yours.

 

[munkle]

If this doesn't seal fact that these are entitled political vermin nothing will. Imagine your boss firing you and you saying nope I'm not going anywhere in the private sector.

 

[X.Onasis]

If this doesn't seal fact that these are entitled political vermin nothing will. Imagine your boss firing you and you saying nope I'm not going anywhere in the private sector.

When you have lawful protections against being fired without cause, that's what you do.
She's set herself up for a successful suit, and the buffoon has shown himself to be not just unfit for his position, but also a traitor to his oath.

 

[X.Onasis]

Stonewalling and/or becoming incoherent is yours.

I appreciate your whimpering response. Is that clear?

 

[X.Onasis]

 

[daveman]

All hail His Imperial American Majesty.

 

[daveman]

It is not just that Congress has passed civil service laws that prevent presidents from arbitrarily firing Inspector Generals, but that this is an ancient tradition going back to the Magna Charta and British Common Law.

To legally fire an Inspector General, you have to give Congress 30 days notice so they can conduct a hearing to determine if the firing is valid or not.
The last time this law was modified was in 1976, so is up to date enough.

So anyone forcing any Inspector General out of their office before there has been the 30 day hearing, is a criminal.

What if Congress decides the firing is invalid? Does the IG stay employed?

 

[daveman]

While rightist believe it is ok if it is illegal.

Your "say the opposite thing a conservative says" tropism makes you say stupid stuff a lot of the time.

 

[daveman]

Another double standard douche worshipping, as Chump dry fucks the Constitution. Not that I care, it's not my dysfunctional founding document, I just find it amusing.

I'm sorry; I can't hear you over the sound of how irrelevant you are.

 

[scruffy]

What if Congress decides the firing is invalid? Does the IG stay employed?

They won't.

 

[daveman]

They won't.

I know. I want Rigby5 to answer, so the realization of how the Legislative branch cannot tell the Executive what to do might sink in.