excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 28,558
- 57,772
- 2,290
Do people have a right to defend themselves against the accusation that they’re a member of such organization?
He had his chance in 2019 and offered no proof that he wasn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do people have a right to defend themselves against the accusation that they’re a member of such organization?
So the Dem shill judge was ***** slapped down, like the loser she is.No, they did not.
This is an administrative stay, intended to order the lower court to pause (not drop) the matter.
If accused but not shown to be, yes it does. Like I have said, I really don't have objections to actual gang members deported to some hellhole off continent location, but non-gang member legal residents, is something else. If you aren't a gang member, you should have opportunity to be heard, and the government should have to show why they think you are a gang member. In the case in the news, the fully employed legal resident since 2011, father of three, married to an American Citizen, does not appear to have any gang associations. Mistakes happen. When they do, they should be corrected. It would be better if they followed the law, though not as quick and not as showy as snatching off the street and hustling to an airplane.
Link to the decision please.He had his chance in 2019 and offered no proof that he wasn't.
Link to the decision please.
Title is a lie. No link to MS 13.April 7 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily halted on Monday a judge's order requiring President Donald Trump's administration to return by the end of the day a Salvadoran man who the government has acknowledged was deported in error to El Salvador.
Chief Justice John Roberts, acting on behalf of the court, paused the order by U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis that the administration return Kilmar Abrego Garcia by the end of Monday, in response to a lawsuit filed by the man and his family challenging the legality of his deportation.
That’s not true. The government said he was in MS-13 because he wore a Chicago bulls cap.It is in the government's filings; he was adjudicated MS-13 by the immigration court ad on appeal it was upheld.
What part of being here legally, with a work permit, do you not understand? Right there in the article. And it ain't easy getting a work permit while seeking asylum, which is probably what is keeping him from deportation. But specifically, no deportation to El Salvador.I'd like to know how, this clown is an ILLEGAL with no right to be in OUR country and is now back in his home country under their laws and leaders. Imagine if we demanded the UK send us one of their citizens.
Most judges don't have that much emotional attachment to their rulings. It's just the business of the law.
The Honorable DONALD JOHN TRUMPWho defines what constitutes an emergency?
It wouldn't surprise me if he got rolled up along with some MS-13 monsters at the same time.If accused but not shown to be, yes it does. Like I have said, I really don't have objections to actual gang members deported to some hellhole off continent location, but non-gang member legal residents, is something else. If you aren't a gang member, you should have opportunity to be heard, and the government should have to show why they think you are a gang member. In the case in the news, the fully employed legal resident since 2011, father of three, married to an American Citizen, does not appear to have any gang associations. Mistakes happen. When they do, they should be corrected. It would be better if they followed the law, though not as quick and not as showy as snatching off the street and hustling to an airplane.
Ok. So the Supremes want more time to consider it, rather than the time being tonight at midnight.
The Fourth Circuit, which earlier today denied a stay, lied in part in their opinion on the request. They claimed he [Garcia] was here legally, when he has been adjudicated as an illegal alien and has admitted he entered illegally. Thus, the Order of Removal handed down in 2019 which order is still valid.
Indeed, the original request for relief in District Court was nothing like that which the court ordered, and now we have this whopper from the Fourth Circuit.
Garcia is not lawfully present in the United States.
![]()
24A949 Abrego Garcia Letter FINAL
www.documentcloud.org
There’s no crisis.he Act empowers the President to activate special powers during a crisis
That’s not true. The government said he was in MS-13 because he wore a Chicago bulls cap.
That’s it.
You guys are out of your minds.
“Sink”?…..WTF are you kidding…We sunk lower than whale shit when your crypt keeper begged 10 million more cockroaches to invade, to maim, rape and murder our daughters…That’s never been done before.And from my understanding, the government's position is, whoops, my bad. But too late, it is in El Salvador's hands now. I mean just how far are we willing to sink?
Apples and Oranges. CBS broadcasts in Galveston, TX so it affected that district. A lower court in HI has no jurisdiction over a case in another district---standing.They filed cases in DC. It’s not like Trump suing CBS in Galveston Texas.
![]()
Trump lawsuit over CBS editing raises issue of judge-shopping
The ex-president’s filing in Texas concerning a “60 Minutes” segment could be a venue stretch. How far can a lawyer reasonably argue that a particular court is the right place to litigate?www.legaldive.com
They’re full of shit.Again:
Ensuing proceedings established that Abrego Garcia was a ranking member ofthe deadly MS-13 gang and thus presented a danger to the community. Soon afterhe was detained, Abrego Garcia requested a bond hearing before an immigrationjudge (IJ). App., infra, 1a. At the hearing, DHS presented evidence that AbregoGarcia had been “arrested in the company of other ranking gang members” and hadbeen “confirmed to be a ranking member of the MS-13 gang by a proven and reliablesource.” Id. at 2a. The IJ agreed that the “evidence show[ed] that [Abrego Garcia] isa verified member of MS-13.” Ibid. The IJ specifically cited “the fact that a ‘past,proven, and reliable source of information’ [had] verified [Abrego Garcia’s] gang mem-bership, rank, and gang name.” Id. at 3a.And the IJ noted that Abrego Garcia had “failed to present evidence to rebut th[e] assertion” that he “is a gang member.” Ibid. Given Abrego Garcia’s MS-13 membership, the IJ determined that Abrego Garcia had “failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his release from custody would not6pose a danger to others.” Id. at 2a. The IJ thus denied his request for release onbond. Id. at 3a. The Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirmed, explaining thatthe IJ had “appropriately considered allegations of gang affiliation against [AbregoGarcia] in determining that he has not demonstrated that he is not a danger to prop-erty or persons.” Id. at 5a.In October 2019, after Abrego Garcia had “conceded his removability ascharged,” an IJ ordered Abrego Garcia’s removal from the United States under Title8. App., infra, 7a; see id. at 60a.
What does Trump do in Galveston?Apples and Oranges. CBS broadcasts in Galveston, TX so it affected that district. A lower court in HI has no jurisdiction over a case in another district---standing.
That’s not true. The government said he was in MS-13 because he wore a Chicago bulls cap.
That’s it.
You guys are out of your minds.