US Supreme Court : Agrees with the President : MS13 gangster Kilmar Abrego Garcia must stay in El Salvador's SuperMax

[Meister]

But, they have been doing just that.

There are 677 Federal District Court Judges and dimocrap scum take the stance that any one of them, unelected, unaccountable to The People, can stop POTUS in his tracks whenever the mood strikes one of them.

Piss-Poor way to run a RailRoad.

What's next? They'll be directing Troop Deployments at the Front? Ruling on how many Tanks we have to send in to help the 101st Airborne, what kind of boots they can wear, telling the Marines they can't have their Crayons anymore? (they need to stop eating them anyway)

I mean WTF, over?

There are less than 50 who play politics over the law, and the democrats
shop for those when going after Trump. That's why they have 1 judge that
has two cases of Trump before him.

 

[BackAgain]

He has an Order of Removal issued in 2019.

The only part is the Order said he should not be removed to El Salvador (where he is from). And that was owing to a claim he made of retaliation by a gang in El Salvador. (Which gang has since been destroyed by President Bukele).

That's it. The recent District Court order said bring to the USA, well an American embassy is the USA, so they could bring him to the American embassy in El Salvador and then deport him to a country of his choosing, or Argentina if he refuses to choose a country.

Also, see post #17 on this thread.

Literally informative. Thanks.

While he should have been sent elsewhere, that shouldn’t give a judge (now) any legal authority to order him returned here.

All in all, if we’re being serious, we have to acknowledge that occasionally mistakes get made. But that we (the U.S.) made this error isn’t a lawful basis for any judge to make up orders that are outside of the legal authority of our courts.

 

[Marener]

There are less than 50 who play politics over the law, and the democrats
shop for those when going after Trump. That's why they have 1 judge that
has two cases of Trump before him.

They filed cases in DC. It’s not like Trump suing CBS in Galveston Texas.

Trump lawsuit over CBS editing raises issue of judge-shopping

The ex-president’s filing in Texas concerning a “60 Minutes” segment could be a venue stretch. How far can a lawyer reasonably argue that a particular court is the right place to litigate?

www.legaldive.com

 

[Edgetho]

The immigration BS in general has been screwed severely by every administration going all the way back at least to Reagan's first term, maybe before that. Not an emergency. He just declared it so, to take the liberty of deportations without judicial review. For actual criminals, actual gang members, the outcome is fine, but the rightness for the many does not outweigh the wrongness of the few or the one. I hope he doesn't get killed in that hellhole prison before it is reviewed.

Great. Now we get the 'Bandwagon' fallacy.

 

[White 6]

Which rule of law might that be?

The Federal law requiring a hearing before deportation.

 

[Contumacious]

And you wonder why we call you guys fascists.

No we don't - we know you have no idea what the term means

 

[Edgetho]

The Federal law requiring a hearing before deportation.
View attachment 1098030

Does that law apply to non-citizens who are members of a Designated Foreign Terrorist organization?

Technical Difficulties

www.state.gov

A half-truth is the worst lie of them all

 

[progressive hunter]

I still think deportations without hearings is wrong, but I did not agree with the tonight at midnight timeline requirement either. The Supremes will do, what they are going to do, sooner or later, in this case, they will do whatever they are going to do Later.

everyone that got deported got a hearing,,

 

[BrokeLoser]

The Federal law requiring a hearing before deportation.
View attachment 1098030

A declaration of national emergency and the invocation of the alien enemies act shits all over 8 U.S. Code 1227
The policy of the POTUS becomes the rule of the law
“When America Wins The Left Loses…Every Single Time”

 

[progressive hunter]

When the rule of law is thrown under the bus, it is another step to all Americans losing, before this increasingly autocratic, authoritarian regime.

you mean like opening the borders against the law and constitution and allowing millions in unvetted??

 

[Marener]

No we don't - we know you have no idea what the term means

Someone who takes dictatorial power through fabricated emergencies checks a bunch of those boxes.

 

[BackAgain]

Does that law apply to non-citizens who are members of a Designated Foreign Terrorist organization?

Technical Difficulties

www.state.gov

A half-truth is the worst lie of them all

That’s a good, solid and fair question.

 

[excalibur]

The Federal law requiring a hearing before deportation.
View attachment 1098030

He had his hearing and appeal years ago, he received a final Order of Removal in 2019 and waived any other right of appeal.

 

[Contumacious]

The Federal law requiring a hearing before deportation.
View attachment 1098030

The Federal Law Which INVALIDATES deportation hearings when the president declares an emergency


The National Emergencies Act (NEA) (Pub. L. 94–412, 90 Stat. 1255, enacted September 14, 1976, codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1601–1651) is a United States federal law passed to end all previous national emergencies and to formalize the emergency powers of the President.

 

[Edgetho]

That’s a good, solid and fair question.

I'm a fair guy

 

[Marener]

Does that law apply to non-citizens who are members of a Designated Foreign Terrorist organization?

Technical Difficulties

www.state.gov

A half-truth is the worst lie of them all

Do people have a right to defend themselves against the accusation that they’re a member of such organization?

 

[Edgetho]

Technical Difficulties

www.state.gov

Today, the Department of State announces the designation of Tren de Aragua (TdA), Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), Cártel de Sinaloa, Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG), Cártel del Noreste (CDN), La Nueva Familia Michoacana (LNFM), Cártel de Golfo (CDG), and Cárteles Unidos (CU) as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).

 

[Contumacious]

Someon

Someone who takes dictatorial power through fabricated emergencies checks a bunch of those boxes.

Someone who chews on the Cackle Queen's used tampons does not have the intelectual wherewithal to make those declarations.

 

[White 6]

Does that law apply to non-citizens who are members of a Designated Foreign Terrorisr organization?

Technical Difficulties

www.state.gov

A half-truth is the worst lie of them all

If accused but not shown to be, yes it does. Like I have said, I really don't have objections to actual gang members deported to some hellhole off continent location, but non-gang member legal residents, is something else. If you aren't a gang member, you should have opportunity to be heard, and the government should have to show why they think you are a gang member. In the case in the news, the fully employed legal resident since 2011, father of three, married to an American Citizen, does not appear to have any gang associations. Mistakes happen. When they do, they should be corrected. It would be better if they followed the law, though not as quick and not as showy as snatching off the street and hustling to an airplane.

 

[TimFitz]

SCOTUS ***** slaps Dem shill judge, about time.

No, they did not.

This is an administrative stay, intended to order the lower court to pause (not drop) the matter.