US Navy Shipyard Turns the Tide on Biden, Says “No” To Vaccine Mandate

eagle1462010

Diamond Member
May 17, 2013
71,308
36,424
2,605

Why did the Navy back down? First, the deadline kept changing. Biden’s executive order called for a November 22 deadline, but shipyard employees were given until December 8. Then the deadline was once again extended to January 4.

Second, it appears that Huntington Ingalls executives took a deep dive into their contract with the Navy. The company has very clearly clarified with the Navy that their contracts do not include a requirement to implement such a vaccine mandate. The Navy officially confirmed this, and therefore employees “don’t have to comply with a vaccine mandate at this time.” The company appeared to have reviewed all contracts to determine modifications and re-pricing needed to reflect the new requirement. A subset of the employees are on a different Technical Solutions contract and the mandate still holds for those employees.

Third, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) shifted gears. In early November, OSHA issued an emergency rule requiring all employers, federal or otherwise, with more than 100 employees to issue a vaccine mandate. A number of states and private sector entities sued. The day after OSHA’s issuance, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the mandate from nationwide implementation. A week later, on November 12, the Fifth Circuit conducted an additional judicial review and ordered the mandate to remain blocked.

Additionally, the Court directed OSHA to take “no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further Court Order.” Biden’s Department of Labor acknowledged the ruling. As a result, OSHA suspended their action regarding the “emergency temporary standard” issuance.


Now the real reason. I know people at the yard down here. All the unions were about to walk off the job.
 

Why did the Navy back down? First, the deadline kept changing. Biden’s executive order called for a November 22 deadline, but shipyard employees were given until December 8. Then the deadline was once again extended to January 4.

Second, it appears that Huntington Ingalls executives took a deep dive into their contract with the Navy. The company has very clearly clarified with the Navy that their contracts do not include a requirement to implement such a vaccine mandate. The Navy officially confirmed this, and therefore employees “don’t have to comply with a vaccine mandate at this time.” The company appeared to have reviewed all contracts to determine modifications and re-pricing needed to reflect the new requirement. A subset of the employees are on a different Technical Solutions contract and the mandate still holds for those employees.

Third, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) shifted gears. In early November, OSHA issued an emergency rule requiring all employers, federal or otherwise, with more than 100 employees to issue a vaccine mandate. A number of states and private sector entities sued. The day after OSHA’s issuance, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the mandate from nationwide implementation. A week later, on November 12, the Fifth Circuit conducted an additional judicial review and ordered the mandate to remain blocked.

Additionally, the Court directed OSHA to take “no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further Court Order.” Biden’s Department of Labor acknowledged the ruling. As a result, OSHA suspended their action regarding the “emergency temporary standard” issuance.


Now the real reason. I know people at the yard down here. All the unions were about to walk off the job.
Good...............
 

Why did the Navy back down? First, the deadline kept changing. Biden’s executive order called for a November 22 deadline, but shipyard employees were given until December 8. Then the deadline was once again extended to January 4.

Second, it appears that Huntington Ingalls executives took a deep dive into their contract with the Navy. The company has very clearly clarified with the Navy that their contracts do not include a requirement to implement such a vaccine mandate. The Navy officially confirmed this, and therefore employees “don’t have to comply with a vaccine mandate at this time.” The company appeared to have reviewed all contracts to determine modifications and re-pricing needed to reflect the new requirement. A subset of the employees are on a different Technical Solutions contract and the mandate still holds for those employees.

Third, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) shifted gears. In early November, OSHA issued an emergency rule requiring all employers, federal or otherwise, with more than 100 employees to issue a vaccine mandate. A number of states and private sector entities sued. The day after OSHA’s issuance, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the mandate from nationwide implementation. A week later, on November 12, the Fifth Circuit conducted an additional judicial review and ordered the mandate to remain blocked.

Additionally, the Court directed OSHA to take “no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further Court Order.” Biden’s Department of Labor acknowledged the ruling. As a result, OSHA suspended their action regarding the “emergency temporary standard” issuance.


Now the real reason. I know people at the yard down here. All the unions were about to walk off the job.

Do you have a real source for this swill? This is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory website with a strong dose of quackery on the side.

"Overall, we rate Vaxxter a quackery level pseudoscience and strong conspiracy website based on anti-vaccination views and deep state conspiracy theories. (D. Van Zandt 5/5/2018)"



 
Do you have a real source for this swill? This is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory website with a strong dose of quackery on the side.

"Overall, we rate Vaxxter a quackery level pseudoscience and strong conspiracy website based on anti-vaccination views and deep state conspiracy theories. (D. Van Zandt 5/5/2018)"



Newport News Shipbuilding no longer requiring vaccinations, workers who left due to previous requirement can request return

Oh, look. It's real. You're wrong. Imagine that.

Unless you'd like to make the case that an ABC affiliate is a hotbed of conspiracy theorists...?
 
Do you have a real source for this swill? This is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory website with a strong dose of quackery on the side.

"Overall, we rate Vaxxter a quackery level pseudoscience and strong conspiracy website based on anti-vaccination views and deep state conspiracy theories. (D. Van Zandt 5/5/2018)"



You took the Trump vaccine didn't you?
 
Do you have a real source for this swill? This is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory website with a strong dose of quackery on the side.

"Overall, we rate Vaxxter a quackery level pseudoscience and strong conspiracy website based on anti-vaccination views and deep state conspiracy theories. (D. Van Zandt 5/5/2018)"



Sure do. Called i work down here and lots work there. Not CNN communist news network lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top