US Military Skedaddle Out Of The Gulf With Their Tail Between Their Legs

They often are refuted, you just fail to accept such, and rant on ...
"number of views" rarely means endorsement/acceptance. Most are either newbies who don't know your disinformation, or looking for another laugh from the clown.


Found a piece of land on Earth outside of 600 miles to a pole in ice age yet?

Didn't think so.

As is typical, the faux conservative Zionist Fascist Traitor is a big supporter of CO2 FRAUD...
 
Found a piece of land on Earth outside of 600 miles to a pole in ice age yet?

Didn't think so.

As is typical, the faux conservative Zionist Fascist Traitor is a big supporter of CO2 FRAUD...
You continue clueless as ever.
I've been a major opponent of ACC~AGW; but it remains beyond your grasp.
 
Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice vs the other?
Being the "expert" you claim, would expect you have the answer.

North polar has significant bodies of water scattered about within, such that warm ocean currents can reach within and limit thickness and extent of ice on water surface, plus accumulation on most coastal areas. Most of the permanent and thicker ice, is on Greenland which is large enough to produce the effect similar to Antarctica. The major central portion of North polar circle is ocean and ice often is only a few feet thick, why we've seen photos of submarines breaking through.

Southern polar has the huge land mass of the Antarctic continent centered within the major portion of the circle, 'warm' water flow is only around the outer edges. Land masses retain cold more than water does, hence ice melts less frequently, and slower, making accumulations in thickness more easily attained.

Ice core samples from both Greenland and Antarctica show extensive ages spanning more than centuries, going into millennial ranges. The ice layers going into scores to hundreds of feet thickness.

[My invoice is available. You can pay for my service via cashiers check or money order.]
 
Being the "expert" you claim, would expect you have the answer.

North polar has significant bodies of water scattered about within, such that warm ocean currents can reach within and limit thickness and extent of ice on water surface, plus accumulation on most coastal areas. Most of the permanent and thicker ice, is on Greenland which is large enough to produce the effect similar to Antarctica. The major central portion of North polar circle is ocean and ice often is only a few feet thick, why we've seen photos of submarines breaking through.

Southern polar has the huge land mass of the Antarctic continent centered within the major portion of the circle, 'warm' water flow is only around the outer edges. Land masses retain cold more than water does, hence ice melts less frequently, and slower, making accumulations in thickness more easily attained.

Ice core samples from both Greenland and Antarctica show extensive ages spanning more than centuries, going into millennial ranges. The ice layers going into scores to hundreds of feet thickness.

[My invoice is available. You can pay for my service via cashiers check or money order.]



Cutting and pasting AI Google.... impresses parroting morons only. When you can show us liquid water on Antarctica, let us know....

What causes Earth climate change?

Simple answer....

LAND near the poles, and land moves tectonically.

90% of Earth ice on land mass Antarctica
7% on Greenland
0.3% on Ellesmere

97.3% of Earth ice is on the three land masses within 600 miles to a pole. The rest is sea ice and mountain tops. What happens when land gets to within 600 miles of a pole?





The amount of ice on Earth is what dictates Earth's climate. Ice dictates...

temperature
ocean levels
atmospheric thickness/surface air pressure
humidity/precipitation
range of cane activity


Earth with two polar oceans = little to no ice = warmer/wetter/higher surface air pressure = Jurassic
Earth with two polar continents = two "Antarcticas" = colder/drier/lower surface air pressure/little to no cane activity
 
^^^^^^


They can whine, toss cards, "disagree" etc...

They cannot refute one word of that...

Everything they claim is easily refuted.
 
^^^^^^
No AI copy-paste.
Just off the top of my head, recall from various sources in the past.

You keep reminding why I don't bother to read your posts anymore.
 
^^^^^^
No AI copy-paste.
Just off the top of my head, recall from various sources in the past.

You keep reminding why I don't bother to read your posts anymore.



Because you can't refute any of them....

why you don't "bother" trying...
 
Others have refuted, you fail to accept.
This is way off topic.
Move your rants to another thread more on topic.



LOL!!!


Amazing correlation between you cowardly "conservative" "faux skeptics" and the worst Zionist Fascists on USMB.
 
Back
Top Bottom