Anarchy666
Platinum Member
- Nov 30, 2025
- 726
- 764
- 873
I bet they're talking about Turkey and Greece, which are literally right next door to Iran.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Iran threatens to invade 2 NATO countries
True. That would be a bridge too far, they cannot even leave their bunkers anymore.<~~~~~~~~~~>
Are you implying that the ideology and methods of the Iranian now deceased Ayatollah and the IRGC are logical?
Consider the implication:
Basically, Iran is proving itself to be everything Trump said they were and so this war as necessary as he said it was.
- Iran realized it was posing an existential threat to Israel, USA and else where ultimately causing a war and invasion.
- Iran expected to lose the war.
- So Iran devised an alternate to attack the region to make others pay for the audacity of not succumbing to their bullying as a means of effecting control beyond their station.
Apocalypse now. Lock 'n load. If the USA puts the smackdown on these bastards it will realign the entire globe.
If the USA backs down now or fails to follow through, we will forever look like the idiots.
Those are not NATO members.Iran threatens to invade 2 NATO countries in chilling WW3 escalation as US paratroopers prepared
25 Mar 2026 ~~ by Eliana Nunes & Brigid Brown
Iran stands "fully prepared" to launch invasions of neighboring Gulf nations "if America makes a mistake in the region," according to a stark warning from an Iranian national security expert.
Morteza Simiyari disclosed that Iran's armed forces have the capacity to carry out amphibious assaults on the UAE and Bahrain, revealing that military personnel have undergone "extensive drills" in preparation for such scenarios.
He addressed "false reports" emerging in recent days claiming Iranian financial holdings have been pulled from the UAE, describing these assertions as "aimed at pressuring the Iranians and carrying out psychological warfare.
Nevertheless, Simiyari issued a direct threat: should Iranian assets actually be seized from the Gulf state, Iran would strike all of the UAE's financial centers. "
However, Simiyari delivered a pointed warning: if Iranian assets were actually confiscated from the Gulf state, Iran would target all of the UAE's financial hubs. "We are very serious with UAE officials because of their ongoing cooperation with the United States," he stated, reports the Express US.
~Snip~
It comes as Iran dismissed an American plan to pause the war in the Middle East and launched more attacks on Israel and Gulf Arab countries, including an assault that sparked a huge fire at Kuwait International Airport.
Iran’s defiance came as Israel launched airstrikes on Tehran and as the United States deployed paratroopers and more Marines to the region.
~Snip~
Iranian state television’s English-language broadcaster quoted an anonymous official as saying Iran rejected America’s ceasefire proposal and has its own demands for an end to the fighting. “Iran will end the war when it decides to do so and when its own conditions are met,” the hardliner-controlled Press TV quoted the official as saying.
~Snip~
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted the U.S. and Iran are in ongoing talks even as Iranian officials deny it. “Talks continue. They are productive, as the president said on Monday, and they continue to be,” Leavitt said at a White House briefing on Wednesday.
Commentary:
Threatening and actually doing something are two very different things. Iran does not have the resources to fight of the US military and then provoke two additional alley countries. The media is playing up every scare tactic and doomsday scenario to keep this going for their own ratings.
Iran's "Baghdad Bob", must be smoking some bad hashish.
Threatening and actually doing something are two very different things. Iran does not have the resources to fight of the US military and then provoke two additional alley countries. The complicit Quisling media is playing up every scare tactic and doomsday scenario to keep this going for their own ratings.
Sadly, most headline reader Democrats and their victims buy into it.
True. Which other country in history randomly attacked other nations because it was being attacked and defeated by Another? Only Iran has done this because they are a terrorist state.
He is just creating some fictitious Bullshit headline - to attract warmongers and anti-Muslim comments.Those are not NATO members.
True. Which other country in history randomly attacked other nations because it was being attacked and defeated by Another? Only Iran has done this because they are a terrorist state. Them being a terrorist state is a huge stumbling block for entities like the Democrats who would like to negotiate with them, simply because they do not recognize Iran as a terrorist state, think they can take their word for things, and believe the Iranian government seeks the same things and outcomes as the Western countries with whome they are negotiating.
I believe from what we have seen they simply do not believe in or care about the benefits of mutual peace in the world. Their government policies are entwined in their particular radical version of Islam.
I think if people do not see that for what it is they are easily manipulated by the Iranians propaganda