US judge blocks Pentagon's effort to punish Senator Mark Kelly

[rightwinger]

<~~~~~~~~~~>​

Then again there's a former Democrat that dodged serving in the military, and was randy enough to have oral sex and molest grieving widows in the White House.
Touché mon ami .. Encore

KELLY 2028

 

[22lcidw]

You mean a President who actually served his country instead of faking bone spurs?

Ùnlike Trump, Kelly is not a convicted felon

Kelly 2028

And yet he is a communist. We got Progressive Socialist Communists astronauts that go to the ISS that are further to the left than the Russians. And they are still paying for what they did in 1917 in a huge way.

 

[Robert W]

MSN

​

WASHINGTON, Feb 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge blocked the Pentagon on Thursday from reducing Senator Mark Kelly's retired military rank and pension pay because he urged troops to reject unlawful orders.

The preliminary ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington is the latest setback in court for President Donald Trump's historic campaign of vengeance against his perceived political enemies, which has drawn pushback from judges across the ideological spectrum.

​

So it seems the revenge tour that this president is on keeps running into legal roadblocks, called the law. How many more times will he lose in court until he finally gives up? I doubt he gives up. He will keep spending tax payer's money as he seeks to inflict pain on anyone who does not bow to him.

Democrats to this very day want to overthrow the government.

 

[rightwinger]

And yet he is a communist. We got Progressive Socialist Communists astronauts that go to the ISS that are further to the left than the Russians. And they are still paying for what they did in 1917 in a huge way.

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats to this very day want to overthrow the government.

Like on Jan 6

 

[WEATHER53]

And of course that judge has no dominion

 

[WorldWatcher]

Like on Jan 6

Techincally J6's weren't trying to "overthrow" the government.

They were trying to interfer with Congress to prevent them from counting the EC votes and send the election to the House.
So it was to overthrow the election, not government.

WW

 

[rightwinger]

Techincally J6's weren't trying to "overthrow" the government.

They were trying to interfer with Congress to prevent them from counting the EC votes and send the election to the House.
So it was to overthrow the election, not government.

WW

An overthrow of a lawful election to install a candidate that was rejected by the voters

 

[WEATHER53]

Techincally J6's weren't trying to "overthrow" the government.

They were trying to interfer with Congress to prevent them from counting the EC votes and send the election to the House.
So it was to overthrow the election, not government.

WW

There was no overthrow attempt because there was utterly zero ability. Intent or thought don’t get it. It’s a hugely overplayed media ploy that the TDS gobble up and shit out and then eat it.

 

[meaner gene]

Do you really think that a President who tells the troops they don't have to obey the commander in chief is really what the country needs?

Yes it is.
Such as if the president orders a nuclear strike on Greenland. The people in the chain of command, shouldn't carry out that order, since it involves the deliberate mass killing of civilians in a country we are not at war with.

 

[rightwinger]

Let’s face it

We elected an egotistical, vengeful, impulsive man with no concern for the laws.

Kelly is correct in warning not just the troops but military leadership about obeying lawful orders.

KELLY 2028

 

[Mac-7]

The message wasn't "aimed" at kids.

It was aimed Generals and Admirals about violating the posse comitatus act and firing on survivors of bombed vessels clinging to wreckage thereby murdering shipwreaked survivors.

Correct, I've never stood at Court Martial (Special or General) although I was called as a witness to one and stood at Captain's Mast a few times with those under my command.

WW

Thats your spin

because if it was only for generals and admirals they would have used an email

 

[meaner gene]

There was no overthrow attempt because there was utterly zero ability. Intent or thought don’t get it. It’s a hugely overplayed media ploy that the TDS gobble up and shit out and then eat it.

Actually intent is at the heart of criminality.

Key Aspects of This Criminal Offense:

Intent Matters: The crime is defined by the intent to commit a felony or theft upon breaking into the secured area, not whether the theft was successful.

Even if the criminal finds nothing, they can still be charged with attempt to commit theft, vandalism, or trespassing.

 

[Polishprince]

Yes it is.
Such as if the president orders a nuclear strike on Greenland. The people in the chain of command, shouldn't carry out that order, since it involves the deliberate mass killing of civilians in a country we are not at war with.

How about if a President orders that Trannies will be commissioned as officers, and openly flaming homos be recruited, and someone objects?

 

[Doc7505]

Democrats to this very day want to overthrow the government.

<~~~~~~~~~~>​

Like Satan, Democrats come in many names and forms.
From the Knights of the Golden Circle (KGC), to post Civil War Ku Klux Klan, to Progressives, to Liberals, to Socialists and back to Democrats.
Their theme has always been to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and it's Amendments.

 

[Robert W]

<~~~~~~~~~~>​

Like Satan, Democrats come in many names and forms.
From the Knights of the Golden Circle (KGC), to post Civil War Ku Klux Klan, to Progressives, to Liberals, to Socialists and back to Democrats.
Their theme has always been to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and it's Amendments.

Open eyes agree with you and me. Bigots keep their eyes shut tight.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

the revenge tour that this president is on

Yet another of countless reasons why Trump is unfit to be president.

 

[rightwinger]

How about if a President orders that Trannies will be commissioned as officers, and openly flaming homos be recruited, and someone objects?

What about that disqualifies them from serving their country?

 

[Polishprince]

What about that disqualifies them from serving their country?

A Democrat President would insist that an officer seeking to enforce Leviticus 18:22 among his troops would be disqualifying, although I would disagree with that.

 

[rightwinger]

A Democrat President would insist that an officer seeking to enforce Leviticus 18:22 among his troops would be disqualifying, although I would disagree with that.

An officers personal faith is irrelevant