Sorry Leftwinger, Wealth is not a "Zero sum" game.....
As the saying goes about the Golden Rule- "He who has the gold...makes the rules"
Has the wealth of the richest 1% increased from 9% to 24% because they have increased the standing of American industry in the world market? Have they lead a rising economic tide? Have they generated 3 times the wealth that was available in 1976?
Since 1976, the percentage of wealth controlled by the US in the world market has declined sharply. The American worker has seen his standard of living decline in this period, while the wealthiest 1% has almost tripled their wealth
The golden rule still applies......the richest 1% has gotten the rules changed so they pay less in taxes, have less stringent labor rules and is able to claim a larger slice of the pie
Now, for the last time..There is no pie...Wealth is created. It does not exist in a vacuum.
There is no "because one has more ,therefore another MUST have less"...It doesn't work that way.
On planet liberal, when a person accumulates more wealth, he "took" a bigger piece or "more than his fair share"....
The wealthiest 10% of the population pays 40% of the federal tax burden.
The top 33% pay nearly 70%....Conversely the bottom 50% pay NO FEDERAL TAX...
So tell me oh whiz of math, how is it the wealthy pay less in taxes?
Would you rather see the top marginal rate go back to 70%? Why not make it 90%....
What is it you libs love so much about high taxes?...Suppose it was you who suddenly had to cough up over half of your income to the government and then watch politicians throw it down a rat hole?