Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably don't amount to anything, but I don't actually know what his NSA claims are. I have met them at fairly high GS level and not their biggest fan, though like other alphabet agencies they have no lingering problem with me. I just hold grudges with ease.People would want to know the reasoning? That's a first amendment violation if any ever were and the government up front admitting they were doing that?
I guess his claims about NSA don't amount to anything then?
He never claimed Dominion voting machines did anything. You obviously do not listen to or follow Tucker. He has always criticized the Trump team people that pushed that, because he saw no evidence of it. Fake injected mail in ballots were the cause of the cheat, not the electronic counting of them.The big steal, Dominion Voting machines and other things.
There was no cheat, at least not one that would change and country or state.He never claimed Dominion voting machines did anything. You obviously do not listen to or follow Tucker. He has always criticized the Trump team people that pushed that, because he saw no evidence of it. Fake injected mail in ballots were the cause of the cheat, not the electronic counting of them.
I would say the conditions stop well after interviewing a head of stateThe 1st. amendment has to come with conditions that make it optional.
Great question. But the quality of the reporter/interviewer has no bearing on their rights.So true! But why do Americans still afford him more attention than any other talking head?
Sure it does. National security isn’t at stake if the interview takes place.The rule of law doesn't carry any weight in these sort of matters. The government does!
Well it's really the ongoing spread of American Marxism. They have already taken over the legacy media, schools and the Democrat Party. They are the power behind Transgender normalization as well. Biden is their figurehead. He doesn't have to really do anything but look the part,This nation is lost. Not only do we have an administrative state that does what they want, we have a large chunk of Americans who thinks it's great--and cheers them on.
Boy, you don't know nothin' 'bout this here, so STFU you Canuck motherfucker!The 1st. amendment has to come with conditions that make it optional.
So true! But why do Americans still afford him more attention than any other talking head?
The rule of law doesn't carry any weight in these sort of matters. The government does!
Don't throw the towel in yet..This nation is lost. Not only do we have an administrative state that does what they want, we have a large chunk of Americans who thinks it's great--and cheers them on.
So the establishment that lies us into wars where good boys die is "safe"?Fox News would have never allowed it. They are solid establishment.
Tucker is so dangerous now on the war effort because he doesn't have any establishment to obey.
I didn't read all that but I hope I've stuck to the point of it?
I honestly don't think that the Government would care, one way, or the other.Why would Tucker lie?
You honestly think the US government wouldn’t do everything possible to prevent such an interview?
He's still on the payroll......Got independent verification? Tucker was fired in disgrace for his lies.
Got independent verification?
It's in the article.Probably don't amount to anything, but I don't actually know what his NSA claims are
Golden Parachute, the Social Security of the 1%!He's still on the payroll......
Democrats cannot have the opinion of others. It exposes their lies. Kinda like the Jan 6th hearings.
I think you're wrong. That would be a sure fire audience draw......Guaranteed.
Since when do journalists need to be restricted as to what they say?
So much for the free press, 'eh?
What's the flavor du jour, Donald?
![]()
Tucker would have interviewed Hitler to get his side of the story if he could have.![]()
US government stopped me from interviewing Putin – Tucker Carlson
TV personality Tucker Carlson is claiming in an interview that the US government stifled his attempts to interview the president of Russiawww.rt.com
This has to be breaking news and also extremely important news for the developing antiwar movement in America.
There can be no legitimate reason why Putin's side of the story should be censored.
Tucker: