Except you brought up examples of women on manosphere podcasts. Truly, we don't know where you get your impression of what women do "as a group", nor do we see acknowledgement that women don't act "as a group" but are significant differences in and among them. Treating women as a monolith is a bit disrespectful.
now you are doing that bit where lefties pretend to be too retarded to understand how to talk about groups.
I already did address this given that surveys reveal 20% of women wouldn't date a man who makes less than them but 60% of men wouldn't date a woman who earns more. Therefore, I believe you may be off base as to the scope and source of the problem.
It’s a lot less significant than the 80% you claimed.
The fact of hypergamy remains. It is a problem. You are not addressing it.
You’re a bit all over the map. Not sure why you are brining racism into it, but I don’t really care.
Rich people want to get richer. The Great Recession proved that rich people are more than willing to screw up the economy if it means they can get rich doing so. The middle class paid the price.
Globalism proves it. I have agreed with you on this. YOU are the one supporting the policies that they want.
Since the elites didn’t suffer one iota, indeed they were bailed out by the taxpayer, everyone knows they’re more than willing to do it again.
And what that means for middle class is that they can’t feel economically secure since we’re all just waiting for the next big crash which led widespread long term unemployment for some and wage stagnation without opposites for the rest.
It’s paralyzing and stops couples from feeling comfortable enough to start a family.
They’re waiting until they feel economic security which either never comes or comes too late to start a family.
So, let's change the economic model to have higher wages for the working poor and middle class.
Which had no effect on the oligarchs because turned around and gave special exemptions to anyone who came to the Oval Office and gave him gifts.
That is a massive exaggeration. SOME of the oligarchs managed to game the system and convince Trump to give them exemptions.
But the overall trend is in the right direction. And exemptions given, can be taken away by the next guy.
YOu are ignoring the overall trend, to focus on the exceptions. And on the good that is already being done to the system and for the American population.
Trump has rigged the system in favor of the wealthy and connected which is why they’re all at his beck and call, unwilling to say anything in opposition of him.
No, MAGA is showing staying power. The oligarchs are starting to realize that they might be forced to play under our rules, so they are trying to build bridges.
They still are hoping that people like you can turn it around and put things back to normal. YOu know, open borders, free trade, and the us continues to decline.
She needed the car and he didn’t. Why should her immediate need for the car be secondary to his potential want for the car later?
lShe refused to say when she would be back. THat's not right.
And you are under the impression this minor spat proves verbal abuse?
You are just a man hater.
My position is the manosphere is turning men into bitter assholes who blame women for not wanting them.
Yes. YOu blame men. You dismiss teh possiblity that men have any real grievances, or that there are any real problems in the dating market or our culture that needs addressed.
And people are suffering because of it.
As an example, your inability to feel any empathy or understanding for Steven Crowder’s very pregnant wife’s needs.
What needs? She WANTED the car and refused to engage in any negotiation on when she would bring it back.
YOu are just always against men.