"Untold Story of Property Owners Who Let Us Build Wall On Their Land"

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,744
Reaction score
5,788
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Still dodging the fact leftist are pro police staters
The fact you support the on going coup means you leftist will be the ones the government coms after

Your dumbassery precedes you. Trump represents the POLICE STATE. His supporters are the ones who got conned into adopting socialist solutions. The Democrats are the Nanny State. It's different sides of the same coin.
You and your fellow members of the coup will be hunted down by the government and dealt with.
What coup would that be? My crime is not taking sides, so what do you charge me with? Voting independent? Civil disobedience? Hell, that made MLK a martyr. Passive resistance? Oh I got it, when I get off the grid, that will make me a criminal and they'll come get me... like they did Randy Weaver? You might be right. I'm just not going to worry about it. They'll just have to do a Cost / Benefits Analysis to see if I'm worth it.
The current coup unending investigation looking for a crime that doesn't exist.
Yes, and we've wasted a whole damn presidential term on nothing. Congress has accomplished nothing and because they have not passed any legislation, they have no one except themselves to blame.

I disagree with Trump on solutions, not the problems. Plain and simple, unless Nancy Pelosi can get Trump impeached, I think even people that don't like him will realize he got fucked. That's the only way to see it. The Dems should be too embarrassed to run a serious campaign against him. Just throw someone like Slow Joe or Pocahontas at him and let him wipe the floor with them and put 'em out of the political arena.
OK very well. Now let's go back to your last post
I cannot speak for all Trump supporters but as for me I to be pro Police is not the same as supporting the police state. To support just laws is not the same as supporting any and all laws regardless if they are constitutional or not.
I have one issue with Trump and it's Firearms
Bump Stock ban which may very well be overturned because the ATF overreacted
Red Flag laws which he has not acted on those views
No firearms until 21 which he has not executively acted on that either.
So unlike obama sheep Trump can lose my support.
 

Porter Rockwell

Silver Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
5,674
Reaction score
493
Points
95
Your dumbassery precedes you. Trump represents the POLICE STATE. His supporters are the ones who got conned into adopting socialist solutions. The Democrats are the Nanny State. It's different sides of the same coin.
You and your fellow members of the coup will be hunted down by the government and dealt with.
What coup would that be? My crime is not taking sides, so what do you charge me with? Voting independent? Civil disobedience? Hell, that made MLK a martyr. Passive resistance? Oh I got it, when I get off the grid, that will make me a criminal and they'll come get me... like they did Randy Weaver? You might be right. I'm just not going to worry about it. They'll just have to do a Cost / Benefits Analysis to see if I'm worth it.
The current coup unending investigation looking for a crime that doesn't exist.
Yes, and we've wasted a whole damn presidential term on nothing. Congress has accomplished nothing and because they have not passed any legislation, they have no one except themselves to blame.

I disagree with Trump on solutions, not the problems. Plain and simple, unless Nancy Pelosi can get Trump impeached, I think even people that don't like him will realize he got fucked. That's the only way to see it. The Dems should be too embarrassed to run a serious campaign against him. Just throw someone like Slow Joe or Pocahontas at him and let him wipe the floor with them and put 'em out of the political arena.
OK very well. Now let's go back to your last post
I cannot speak for all Trump supporters but as for me I to be pro Police is not the same as supporting the police state. To support just laws is not the same as supporting any and all laws regardless if they are constitutional or not.
I have one issue with Trump and it's Firearms
Bump Stock ban which may very well be overturned because the ATF overreacted
Red Flag laws which he has not acted on those views
No firearms until 21 which he has not executively acted on that either.
So unlike obama sheep Trump can lose my support.
I was neutral on Trump because I KNOW he is well aware of the fact that he cannot enforce much of his border wall B.S. He's pandering to the masses. A lot of it will predictably be overturned in the United States Supreme Court. Other parts of it will be defunded by Congress. Some of it is Executive Orders that a liberal Democrat will simply rescind.

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE counts:

1) It attacks the Second Amendment outright

2) It violated the ban on ex post facto laws by requiring people to turn in existing stocks (see Article I Section 9 of the Constitution.) If you recall, when the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban went into effect, you got to keep your existing weapons

3) The only way Trump could ban bump stocks was under the guise of doing so for the public good. In that case, he was required to give just compensation to those turning in the stocks. That is in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Trump stated that:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. ..The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.." His 2000 book The America We Deserve

Trump has an anti-gun Attorney General:

Gun Owners of America

Trump's pick for the head of the BATFE is anti - gun:

Trump’s Pick to lead ATF has Supported Gun Control | Gun Owners of America

Trump’s Pick to Head ATF Is in Jeopardy

Trump is confident he can flip the NRA on background checks and Red Flag Laws:

NRA on background checks: Gun-rights organization will 'get there.' Trump says - CNNPolitics

Trump says he wants background checks, also reassures NRA

Let us not forget his famous words:

Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'

Gun control is my litmus test. For that reason, I do not support Trump in any way, shape, fashion or form. The flip side to that coin is that all his political opposition is just like him on the issue so there is nothing to be gained from voting for him UNLESS you have Republican control over the House and Senate and a Democrat as president. Since we don't have that, we gain nothing with or without Trump.

With unemployment at what is known as statistical zero unemployment, you cannot make an economic case for the nutty wall idea. That's not to say we do not have a problem with foreigners, but that is a problem of our own making. Foreigners are not pushing drugs down your kids throats. No, that honor belongs to parents, schools, the government, doctors and Big Pharma.

As those children are aging, they are the ones dragging America down. People like me would rather hire an American, but honestly I do not know one, single solitary white male between the ages of 18 to 30 (except for college grads) that can do anything. Here are guys that cannot change a tire on their car; they can't replace a light socket; can't fix a leaky sink. Virtually all of them have a drug habit, a criminal record, and no high school diploma. They have no real work experience, no work ethic, nothing.

Between the million new citizens we naturalize, the guys that are professional "gamers" or YouTube sensations, those who are gay, and those who have gotten into inter-racial marriages, the only demographic not doing so great in today's economy are white males... and they are doing it to themselves.

You have to clean up your own culture and quit allowing yourselves to be flipped by Democrats posing as Republicans AND learn how the peripheral laws surrounding the wall are destroying your country. You're being played by wannabe tyrants.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,744
Reaction score
5,788
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
You and your fellow members of the coup will be hunted down by the government and dealt with.
What coup would that be? My crime is not taking sides, so what do you charge me with? Voting independent? Civil disobedience? Hell, that made MLK a martyr. Passive resistance? Oh I got it, when I get off the grid, that will make me a criminal and they'll come get me... like they did Randy Weaver? You might be right. I'm just not going to worry about it. They'll just have to do a Cost / Benefits Analysis to see if I'm worth it.
The current coup unending investigation looking for a crime that doesn't exist.
Yes, and we've wasted a whole damn presidential term on nothing. Congress has accomplished nothing and because they have not passed any legislation, they have no one except themselves to blame.

I disagree with Trump on solutions, not the problems. Plain and simple, unless Nancy Pelosi can get Trump impeached, I think even people that don't like him will realize he got fucked. That's the only way to see it. The Dems should be too embarrassed to run a serious campaign against him. Just throw someone like Slow Joe or Pocahontas at him and let him wipe the floor with them and put 'em out of the political arena.
OK very well. Now let's go back to your last post
I cannot speak for all Trump supporters but as for me I to be pro Police is not the same as supporting the police state. To support just laws is not the same as supporting any and all laws regardless if they are constitutional or not.
I have one issue with Trump and it's Firearms
Bump Stock ban which may very well be overturned because the ATF overreacted
Red Flag laws which he has not acted on those views
No firearms until 21 which he has not executively acted on that either.
So unlike obama sheep Trump can lose my support.
I was neutral on Trump because I KNOW he is well aware of the fact that he cannot enforce much of his border wall B.S. He's pandering to the masses. A lot of it will predictably be overturned in the United States Supreme Court. Other parts of it will be defunded by Congress. Some of it is Executive Orders that a liberal Democrat will simply rescind.

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE counts:

1) It attacks the Second Amendment outright

2) It violated the ban on ex post facto laws by requiring people to turn in existing stocks (see Article I Section 9 of the Constitution.) If you recall, when the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban went into effect, you got to keep your existing weapons

3) The only way Trump could ban bump stocks was under the guise of doing so for the public good. In that case, he was required to give just compensation to those turning in the stocks. That is in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Trump stated that:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. ..The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.." His 2000 book The America We Deserve

Trump has an anti-gun Attorney General:

Gun Owners of America

Trump's pick for the head of the BATFE is anti - gun:

Trump’s Pick to lead ATF has Supported Gun Control | Gun Owners of America

Trump’s Pick to Head ATF Is in Jeopardy

Trump is confident he can flip the NRA on background checks and Red Flag Laws:

NRA on background checks: Gun-rights organization will 'get there.' Trump says - CNNPolitics

Trump says he wants background checks, also reassures NRA

Let us not forget his famous words:

Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'

Gun control is my litmus test. For that reason, I do not support Trump in any way, shape, fashion or form. The flip side to that coin is that all his political opposition is just like him on the issue so there is nothing to be gained from voting for him UNLESS you have Republican control over the House and Senate and a Democrat as president. Since we don't have that, we gain nothing with or without Trump.

With unemployment at what is known as statistical zero unemployment, you cannot make an economic case for the nutty wall idea. That's not to say we do not have a problem with foreigners, but that is a problem of our own making. Foreigners are not pushing drugs down your kids throats. No, that honor belongs to parents, schools, the government, doctors and Big Pharma.

As those children are aging, they are the ones dragging America down. People like me would rather hire an American, but honestly I do not know one, single solitary white male between the ages of 18 to 30 (except for college grads) that can do anything. Here are guys that cannot change a tire on their car; they can't replace a light socket; can't fix a leaky sink. Virtually all of them have a drug habit, a criminal record, and no high school diploma. They have no real work experience, no work ethic, nothing.

Between the million new citizens we naturalize, the guys that are professional "gamers" or YouTube sensations, those who are gay, and those who have gotten into inter-racial marriages, the only demographic not doing so great in today's economy are white males... and they are doing it to themselves.

You have to clean up your own culture and quit allowing yourselves to be flipped by Democrats posing as Republicans AND learn how the peripheral laws surrounding the wall are destroying your country. You're being played by wannabe tyrants.
You are being played by the Democrat party period they need more slaves for the plantation.
 

Porter Rockwell

Silver Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
5,674
Reaction score
493
Points
95
What coup would that be? My crime is not taking sides, so what do you charge me with? Voting independent? Civil disobedience? Hell, that made MLK a martyr. Passive resistance? Oh I got it, when I get off the grid, that will make me a criminal and they'll come get me... like they did Randy Weaver? You might be right. I'm just not going to worry about it. They'll just have to do a Cost / Benefits Analysis to see if I'm worth it.
The current coup unending investigation looking for a crime that doesn't exist.
Yes, and we've wasted a whole damn presidential term on nothing. Congress has accomplished nothing and because they have not passed any legislation, they have no one except themselves to blame.

I disagree with Trump on solutions, not the problems. Plain and simple, unless Nancy Pelosi can get Trump impeached, I think even people that don't like him will realize he got fucked. That's the only way to see it. The Dems should be too embarrassed to run a serious campaign against him. Just throw someone like Slow Joe or Pocahontas at him and let him wipe the floor with them and put 'em out of the political arena.
OK very well. Now let's go back to your last post
I cannot speak for all Trump supporters but as for me I to be pro Police is not the same as supporting the police state. To support just laws is not the same as supporting any and all laws regardless if they are constitutional or not.
I have one issue with Trump and it's Firearms
Bump Stock ban which may very well be overturned because the ATF overreacted
Red Flag laws which he has not acted on those views
No firearms until 21 which he has not executively acted on that either.
So unlike obama sheep Trump can lose my support.
I was neutral on Trump because I KNOW he is well aware of the fact that he cannot enforce much of his border wall B.S. He's pandering to the masses. A lot of it will predictably be overturned in the United States Supreme Court. Other parts of it will be defunded by Congress. Some of it is Executive Orders that a liberal Democrat will simply rescind.

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE counts:

1) It attacks the Second Amendment outright

2) It violated the ban on ex post facto laws by requiring people to turn in existing stocks (see Article I Section 9 of the Constitution.) If you recall, when the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban went into effect, you got to keep your existing weapons

3) The only way Trump could ban bump stocks was under the guise of doing so for the public good. In that case, he was required to give just compensation to those turning in the stocks. That is in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Trump stated that:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. ..The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.." His 2000 book The America We Deserve

Trump has an anti-gun Attorney General:

Gun Owners of America

Trump's pick for the head of the BATFE is anti - gun:

Trump’s Pick to lead ATF has Supported Gun Control | Gun Owners of America

Trump’s Pick to Head ATF Is in Jeopardy

Trump is confident he can flip the NRA on background checks and Red Flag Laws:

NRA on background checks: Gun-rights organization will 'get there.' Trump says - CNNPolitics

Trump says he wants background checks, also reassures NRA

Let us not forget his famous words:

Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'

Gun control is my litmus test. For that reason, I do not support Trump in any way, shape, fashion or form. The flip side to that coin is that all his political opposition is just like him on the issue so there is nothing to be gained from voting for him UNLESS you have Republican control over the House and Senate and a Democrat as president. Since we don't have that, we gain nothing with or without Trump.

With unemployment at what is known as statistical zero unemployment, you cannot make an economic case for the nutty wall idea. That's not to say we do not have a problem with foreigners, but that is a problem of our own making. Foreigners are not pushing drugs down your kids throats. No, that honor belongs to parents, schools, the government, doctors and Big Pharma.

As those children are aging, they are the ones dragging America down. People like me would rather hire an American, but honestly I do not know one, single solitary white male between the ages of 18 to 30 (except for college grads) that can do anything. Here are guys that cannot change a tire on their car; they can't replace a light socket; can't fix a leaky sink. Virtually all of them have a drug habit, a criminal record, and no high school diploma. They have no real work experience, no work ethic, nothing.

Between the million new citizens we naturalize, the guys that are professional "gamers" or YouTube sensations, those who are gay, and those who have gotten into inter-racial marriages, the only demographic not doing so great in today's economy are white males... and they are doing it to themselves.

You have to clean up your own culture and quit allowing yourselves to be flipped by Democrats posing as Republicans AND learn how the peripheral laws surrounding the wall are destroying your country. You're being played by wannabe tyrants.
You are being played by the Democrat party period they need more slaves for the plantation.
Make this easy for everybody. How are the Democrats playing me?

Bear in mind, I do not rely on the MSM, have never voted for Democrats, am not influenced in the media by them as I do not have cable or satellite tv and don't access their sites when I'm on the computer. My radio in the car is tuned to conservative talk radio.

How can people that I do not come into contact with influence me? Son, I didn't even watch their debates.

The ONLY people influencing my thought process are those on the right. Quite frankly, all I hear from your side is the B.S. spewed by Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It's damn near verbatim and you can't explain that. So, it is going to sound mighty funny when you psychoanalyze me and find out that NOBODY among the Democrats sounds like me. My talking points are all mine. Disagreeing with the double agent Democrat, Donald Trump, doesn't make me a Democrat. It only means that you're afraid to look at the indisputable FACTS.

Did you ever consider that when people cannot disagree with Donald Trump without you jumping to his defense and making unsubstantiated claims, it might be YOU that was played?
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,744
Reaction score
5,788
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
The current coup unending investigation looking for a crime that doesn't exist.
Yes, and we've wasted a whole damn presidential term on nothing. Congress has accomplished nothing and because they have not passed any legislation, they have no one except themselves to blame.

I disagree with Trump on solutions, not the problems. Plain and simple, unless Nancy Pelosi can get Trump impeached, I think even people that don't like him will realize he got fucked. That's the only way to see it. The Dems should be too embarrassed to run a serious campaign against him. Just throw someone like Slow Joe or Pocahontas at him and let him wipe the floor with them and put 'em out of the political arena.
OK very well. Now let's go back to your last post
I cannot speak for all Trump supporters but as for me I to be pro Police is not the same as supporting the police state. To support just laws is not the same as supporting any and all laws regardless if they are constitutional or not.
I have one issue with Trump and it's Firearms
Bump Stock ban which may very well be overturned because the ATF overreacted
Red Flag laws which he has not acted on those views
No firearms until 21 which he has not executively acted on that either.
So unlike obama sheep Trump can lose my support.
I was neutral on Trump because I KNOW he is well aware of the fact that he cannot enforce much of his border wall B.S. He's pandering to the masses. A lot of it will predictably be overturned in the United States Supreme Court. Other parts of it will be defunded by Congress. Some of it is Executive Orders that a liberal Democrat will simply rescind.

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE counts:

1) It attacks the Second Amendment outright

2) It violated the ban on ex post facto laws by requiring people to turn in existing stocks (see Article I Section 9 of the Constitution.) If you recall, when the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban went into effect, you got to keep your existing weapons

3) The only way Trump could ban bump stocks was under the guise of doing so for the public good. In that case, he was required to give just compensation to those turning in the stocks. That is in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Trump stated that:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. ..The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.." His 2000 book The America We Deserve

Trump has an anti-gun Attorney General:

Gun Owners of America

Trump's pick for the head of the BATFE is anti - gun:

Trump’s Pick to lead ATF has Supported Gun Control | Gun Owners of America

Trump’s Pick to Head ATF Is in Jeopardy

Trump is confident he can flip the NRA on background checks and Red Flag Laws:

NRA on background checks: Gun-rights organization will 'get there.' Trump says - CNNPolitics

Trump says he wants background checks, also reassures NRA

Let us not forget his famous words:

Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'

Gun control is my litmus test. For that reason, I do not support Trump in any way, shape, fashion or form. The flip side to that coin is that all his political opposition is just like him on the issue so there is nothing to be gained from voting for him UNLESS you have Republican control over the House and Senate and a Democrat as president. Since we don't have that, we gain nothing with or without Trump.

With unemployment at what is known as statistical zero unemployment, you cannot make an economic case for the nutty wall idea. That's not to say we do not have a problem with foreigners, but that is a problem of our own making. Foreigners are not pushing drugs down your kids throats. No, that honor belongs to parents, schools, the government, doctors and Big Pharma.

As those children are aging, they are the ones dragging America down. People like me would rather hire an American, but honestly I do not know one, single solitary white male between the ages of 18 to 30 (except for college grads) that can do anything. Here are guys that cannot change a tire on their car; they can't replace a light socket; can't fix a leaky sink. Virtually all of them have a drug habit, a criminal record, and no high school diploma. They have no real work experience, no work ethic, nothing.

Between the million new citizens we naturalize, the guys that are professional "gamers" or YouTube sensations, those who are gay, and those who have gotten into inter-racial marriages, the only demographic not doing so great in today's economy are white males... and they are doing it to themselves.

You have to clean up your own culture and quit allowing yourselves to be flipped by Democrats posing as Republicans AND learn how the peripheral laws surrounding the wall are destroying your country. You're being played by wannabe tyrants.
You are being played by the Democrat party period they need more slaves for the plantation.
Make this easy for everybody. How are the Democrats playing me?

Bear in mind, I do not rely on the MSM, have never voted for Democrats, am not influenced in the media by them as I do not have cable or satellite tv and don't access their sites when I'm on the computer. My radio in the car is tuned to conservative talk radio.

How can people that I do not come into contact with influence me? Son, I didn't even watch their debates.

The ONLY people influencing my thought process are those on the right. Quite frankly, all I hear from your side is the B.S. spewed by Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It's damn near verbatim and you can't explain that. So, it is going to sound mighty funny when you psychoanalyze me and find out that NOBODY among the Democrats sounds like me. My talking points are all mine. Disagreeing with the double agent Democrat, Donald Trump, doesn't make me a Democrat. It only means that you're afraid to look at the indisputable FACTS.

Did you ever consider that when people cannot disagree with Donald Trump without you jumping to his defense and making unsubstantiated claims, it might be YOU that was played?
You sound like one of those everything is free freeloader
 

Porter Rockwell

Silver Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
5,674
Reaction score
493
Points
95
Yes, and we've wasted a whole damn presidential term on nothing. Congress has accomplished nothing and because they have not passed any legislation, they have no one except themselves to blame.

I disagree with Trump on solutions, not the problems. Plain and simple, unless Nancy Pelosi can get Trump impeached, I think even people that don't like him will realize he got fucked. That's the only way to see it. The Dems should be too embarrassed to run a serious campaign against him. Just throw someone like Slow Joe or Pocahontas at him and let him wipe the floor with them and put 'em out of the political arena.
OK very well. Now let's go back to your last post
I cannot speak for all Trump supporters but as for me I to be pro Police is not the same as supporting the police state. To support just laws is not the same as supporting any and all laws regardless if they are constitutional or not.
I have one issue with Trump and it's Firearms
Bump Stock ban which may very well be overturned because the ATF overreacted
Red Flag laws which he has not acted on those views
No firearms until 21 which he has not executively acted on that either.
So unlike obama sheep Trump can lose my support.
I was neutral on Trump because I KNOW he is well aware of the fact that he cannot enforce much of his border wall B.S. He's pandering to the masses. A lot of it will predictably be overturned in the United States Supreme Court. Other parts of it will be defunded by Congress. Some of it is Executive Orders that a liberal Democrat will simply rescind.

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE counts:

1) It attacks the Second Amendment outright

2) It violated the ban on ex post facto laws by requiring people to turn in existing stocks (see Article I Section 9 of the Constitution.) If you recall, when the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban went into effect, you got to keep your existing weapons

3) The only way Trump could ban bump stocks was under the guise of doing so for the public good. In that case, he was required to give just compensation to those turning in the stocks. That is in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Trump stated that:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. ..The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.." His 2000 book The America We Deserve

Trump has an anti-gun Attorney General:

Gun Owners of America

Trump's pick for the head of the BATFE is anti - gun:

Trump’s Pick to lead ATF has Supported Gun Control | Gun Owners of America

Trump’s Pick to Head ATF Is in Jeopardy

Trump is confident he can flip the NRA on background checks and Red Flag Laws:

NRA on background checks: Gun-rights organization will 'get there.' Trump says - CNNPolitics

Trump says he wants background checks, also reassures NRA

Let us not forget his famous words:

Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'

Gun control is my litmus test. For that reason, I do not support Trump in any way, shape, fashion or form. The flip side to that coin is that all his political opposition is just like him on the issue so there is nothing to be gained from voting for him UNLESS you have Republican control over the House and Senate and a Democrat as president. Since we don't have that, we gain nothing with or without Trump.

With unemployment at what is known as statistical zero unemployment, you cannot make an economic case for the nutty wall idea. That's not to say we do not have a problem with foreigners, but that is a problem of our own making. Foreigners are not pushing drugs down your kids throats. No, that honor belongs to parents, schools, the government, doctors and Big Pharma.

As those children are aging, they are the ones dragging America down. People like me would rather hire an American, but honestly I do not know one, single solitary white male between the ages of 18 to 30 (except for college grads) that can do anything. Here are guys that cannot change a tire on their car; they can't replace a light socket; can't fix a leaky sink. Virtually all of them have a drug habit, a criminal record, and no high school diploma. They have no real work experience, no work ethic, nothing.

Between the million new citizens we naturalize, the guys that are professional "gamers" or YouTube sensations, those who are gay, and those who have gotten into inter-racial marriages, the only demographic not doing so great in today's economy are white males... and they are doing it to themselves.

You have to clean up your own culture and quit allowing yourselves to be flipped by Democrats posing as Republicans AND learn how the peripheral laws surrounding the wall are destroying your country. You're being played by wannabe tyrants.
You are being played by the Democrat party period they need more slaves for the plantation.
Make this easy for everybody. How are the Democrats playing me?

Bear in mind, I do not rely on the MSM, have never voted for Democrats, am not influenced in the media by them as I do not have cable or satellite tv and don't access their sites when I'm on the computer. My radio in the car is tuned to conservative talk radio.

How can people that I do not come into contact with influence me? Son, I didn't even watch their debates.

The ONLY people influencing my thought process are those on the right. Quite frankly, all I hear from your side is the B.S. spewed by Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It's damn near verbatim and you can't explain that. So, it is going to sound mighty funny when you psychoanalyze me and find out that NOBODY among the Democrats sounds like me. My talking points are all mine. Disagreeing with the double agent Democrat, Donald Trump, doesn't make me a Democrat. It only means that you're afraid to look at the indisputable FACTS.

Did you ever consider that when people cannot disagree with Donald Trump without you jumping to his defense and making unsubstantiated claims, it might be YOU that was played?
You sound like one of those everything is free freeloader
I'm a freeloader for not paying for a tv I don't watch? I'm a freeloader because I use the office computer during my downtime so people don't pursue me at home? Well, when I pay for services, I pay the highest because I demand the best. Freeloader isn't a very accurate term.

Do you have ANYTHING other than insults that might lead a rational person to believe you have any valid criticism against me other than the fact that I do not believe Donald Trump is a god?
 

Billyboom

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
4,526
Reaction score
961
Points
170
There is NO EXCUSE for not publically financing these WALL BUILDERS, as they DRASTICALLY CUT COSTS AND TIME needed to do the job!....but we have the DemonRATS standing in the way....all for potentially MORE VOTES to keep them in power....Power over the good of our country!!!

Yeah, Trump wants to steal land along the border via eminent domain abuses. This will set the precedent for the government to take private property without just compensation in the future.

New Bill Would Stop Eminent Domain Abuse Along the Border
In texas, all rivers have adjacent right of ways along the banks that is owned by the state. Also, anyone not wanting a fence on their land at the border paid for by the gov is a commie fool. You are a liar.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

miketx

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
78,403
Reaction score
14,989
Points
2,220
There is NO EXCUSE for not publically financing these WALL BUILDERS, as they DRASTICALLY CUT COSTS AND TIME needed to do the job!....but we have the DemonRATS standing in the way....all for potentially MORE VOTES to keep them in power....Power over the good of our country!!!

Yeah, Trump wants to steal land along the border via eminent domain abuses. This will set the precedent for the government to take private property without just compensation in the future.

New Bill Would Stop Eminent Domain Abuse Along the Border
In texas, all rivers have adjacent right of ways along the banks that is owned by the state. Also, anyone not wanting a fence on their land at the border paid for by the gov is a commie fool. You are a liar.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It means exactly what I think it means, In fact, Lair, I once owned land on a river in Texas and they are VERY clear on how far my land extended to the river. It was about 50 feet I could go on but that I could not control.
 

Billyboom

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
4,526
Reaction score
961
Points
170
There is NO EXCUSE for not publically financing these WALL BUILDERS, as they DRASTICALLY CUT COSTS AND TIME needed to do the job!....but we have the DemonRATS standing in the way....all for potentially MORE VOTES to keep them in power....Power over the good of our country!!!

Yeah, Trump wants to steal land along the border via eminent domain abuses. This will set the precedent for the government to take private property without just compensation in the future.

New Bill Would Stop Eminent Domain Abuse Along the Border
In texas, all rivers have adjacent right of ways along the banks that is owned by the state. Also, anyone not wanting a fence on their land at the border paid for by the gov is a commie fool. You are a liar.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It means exactly what I think it means, In fact, Lair, I once owned land on a river in Texas and they are VERY clear on how far my land extended to the river. It was about 50 feet I could go on but that I could not control.
I think you think you know what it means but you don’t.

You can’t even spell L-I-A-R.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

miketx

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
78,403
Reaction score
14,989
Points
2,220
There is NO EXCUSE for not publically financing these WALL BUILDERS, as they DRASTICALLY CUT COSTS AND TIME needed to do the job!....but we have the DemonRATS standing in the way....all for potentially MORE VOTES to keep them in power....Power over the good of our country!!!

Yeah, Trump wants to steal land along the border via eminent domain abuses. This will set the precedent for the government to take private property without just compensation in the future.

New Bill Would Stop Eminent Domain Abuse Along the Border
In texas, all rivers have adjacent right of ways along the banks that is owned by the state. Also, anyone not wanting a fence on their land at the border paid for by the gov is a commie fool. You are a liar.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It means exactly what I think it means, In fact, Lair, I once owned land on a river in Texas and they are VERY clear on how far my land extended to the river. It was about 50 feet I could go on but that I could not control.
I think you think you know what it means but you don’t.

You can’t even spell L-I-A-R.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I can spell lair and I know exactly what it means, lair. All rivers have a portion of the bank that land owners do not control No matter how many times your sorry lying ass says otherwise it won't change the fact.
 

Porter Rockwell

Silver Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
5,674
Reaction score
493
Points
95
There is NO EXCUSE for not publically financing these WALL BUILDERS, as they DRASTICALLY CUT COSTS AND TIME needed to do the job!....but we have the DemonRATS standing in the way....all for potentially MORE VOTES to keep them in power....Power over the good of our country!!!

Yeah, Trump wants to steal land along the border via eminent domain abuses. This will set the precedent for the government to take private property without just compensation in the future.

New Bill Would Stop Eminent Domain Abuse Along the Border
In texas, all rivers have adjacent right of ways along the banks that is owned by the state. Also, anyone not wanting a fence on their land at the border paid for by the gov is a commie fool. You are a liar.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It means exactly what I think it means, In fact, Lair, I once owned land on a river in Texas and they are VERY clear on how far my land extended to the river. It was about 50 feet I could go on but that I could not control.
I think you think you know what it means but you don’t.

You can’t even spell L-I-A-R.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Most Trump supporters do not realize that Trump is capitalizing on an issue that came to a head in 2003. Back then a border patrol group was watching private land along the border at the owner's behest. Long story short:

The border patrol group stopped some Salvadorans trying to trespass on private property in order to effect an improper entry. The Salvadorans got into an altercation with the border patrol guys and lost the fight. The Salvadorans sued. The judge ruled that the border patrol guys violated the "civil rights" of the Salvadorans. The border patrol guys went to prison; the Salvadorans got the landowner's ranch as punitive damages.

In rode the so - called "Minutemen" were financed and promoted by a rich eugenics activist who had previously given David Duke (the neo-nazi turned KKK leader turned state senator) his talking points. Soooo...

Today, Trump supporters are influenced and are parroting B.S. that filtered down through neo nazi think tanks. Being socialist and not understanding how the nazi version of socialism works, those guys have to double down on their arguments. Look at how the economics of National Socialism work:

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
 

miketx

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
78,403
Reaction score
14,989
Points
2,220
Yeah, Trump wants to steal land along the border via eminent domain abuses. This will set the precedent for the government to take private property without just compensation in the future.

New Bill Would Stop Eminent Domain Abuse Along the Border
In texas, all rivers have adjacent right of ways along the banks that is owned by the state. Also, anyone not wanting a fence on their land at the border paid for by the gov is a commie fool. You are a liar.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It means exactly what I think it means, In fact, Lair, I once owned land on a river in Texas and they are VERY clear on how far my land extended to the river. It was about 50 feet I could go on but that I could not control.
I think you think you know what it means but you don’t.

You can’t even spell L-I-A-R.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Most Trump supporters do not realize that Trump is capitalizing on an issue that came to a head in 2003. Back then a border patrol group was watching private land along the border at the owner's behest. Long story short:

The border patrol group stopped some Salvadorans trying to trespass on private property in order to effect an improper entry. The Salvadorans got into an altercation with the border patrol guys and lost the fight. The Salvadorans sued. The judge ruled that the border patrol guys violated the "civil rights" of the Salvadorans. The border patrol guys went to prison; the Salvadorans got the landowner's ranch as punitive damages.

In rode the so - called "Minutemen" were financed and promoted by a rich eugenics activist who had previously given David Duke (the neo-nazi turned KKK leader turned state senator) his talking points. Soooo...

Today, Trump supporters are influenced and are parroting B.S. that filtered down through neo nazi think tanks. Being socialist and not understanding how the nazi version of socialism works, those guys have to double down on their arguments. Look at how the economics of National Socialism work:

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Total media bullshit spread by shills. People have every right to protect their property and keep criminals off of it. And all rivers in Texas have a right of way owned by the government.
 

Porter Rockwell

Silver Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
5,674
Reaction score
493
Points
95
In texas, all rivers have adjacent right of ways along the banks that is owned by the state. Also, anyone not wanting a fence on their land at the border paid for by the gov is a commie fool. You are a liar.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It means exactly what I think it means, In fact, Lair, I once owned land on a river in Texas and they are VERY clear on how far my land extended to the river. It was about 50 feet I could go on but that I could not control.
I think you think you know what it means but you don’t.

You can’t even spell L-I-A-R.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Most Trump supporters do not realize that Trump is capitalizing on an issue that came to a head in 2003. Back then a border patrol group was watching private land along the border at the owner's behest. Long story short:

The border patrol group stopped some Salvadorans trying to trespass on private property in order to effect an improper entry. The Salvadorans got into an altercation with the border patrol guys and lost the fight. The Salvadorans sued. The judge ruled that the border patrol guys violated the "civil rights" of the Salvadorans. The border patrol guys went to prison; the Salvadorans got the landowner's ranch as punitive damages.

In rode the so - called "Minutemen" were financed and promoted by a rich eugenics activist who had previously given David Duke (the neo-nazi turned KKK leader turned state senator) his talking points. Soooo...

Today, Trump supporters are influenced and are parroting B.S. that filtered down through neo nazi think tanks. Being socialist and not understanding how the nazi version of socialism works, those guys have to double down on their arguments. Look at how the economics of National Socialism work:

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Total media bullshit spread by shills. People have every right to protect their property and keep criminals off of it. And all rivers in Texas have a right of way owned by the government.
Where, in ANY mainstream media - or even political media outlets are saying what I say? Trump supporters keep accusing me of that, but cannot reference a single source. Why? That is an easy one. You are spreading a LIE.

What I post comes from about four decades of experience. Now, in order for you to sustain what you accused me of, you would have to reference a single source.

The idiocy of Trump supporters can be overcome with a little common sense. So, if you have a border wall and the government has to access it, they must go over private property. If they have to go over private property, they will do so without a warrant and if you are trying to protect your private property, they will kill you for obstructing their access to the border wall.

Since the Trump supporters have made this about a "legal" issue by calling people "illegals" (absent the Due Process they and their leader despise) then the question gravitates to when a warrant is needed. If the wall is built, the answer then logically becomes the government will never need a warrant. They already have the Constitution Free Zone being used as a pretext to enforce existing laws.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top