Unrestrained Capitalism Would Cause........

[Tehon]

That is called a market, not capitalism./QUOTE]

its called a capitalist market not a communist, socialist, or fascist market each of which would have different characteristics than a capitalist market. Do you understand these basics now??

The market could serve a socialist society just the same!

so???? a market could serve a fascist, communist, mercantile society or govt but it would not be a capitalist market as described above!!! 1+1=2

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

 

[bripat9643]

and what have you learned exactly??

Well, I guess I've learned that a person can be so intellectually paralyzed by their political ideology that they can (a) bear witness to the most complicated and wide-reaching financial crisis in the history of the planet and (b) still have the temerity to suggest that capitalism should be further de-regulated.

Breathtaking, really.

I can only assume that you have actively and aggressively avoided exposing yourself to the full details of that historic financial disaster and the glaring role de-regulation played in it, acquainting yourself only with the "facts" as presented by respected financial experts like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Breitbart and WND.
...

When was the financial industry deregulated? There were tens of thousands of pages of regulations on the book when the 2008 collapse occurred.

 

[Tehon]

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

In a Marxist society we would have an abundance of American made inexpensive goods. Your cheap Chinese shit would be a thing of the past.

 

[bripat9643]

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

 

[dblack]

gawd equivocation on terms is tiresome.

 

[bripat9643]

There's no such thing as unrestrained capitalism. That would be anarchy, a Mad Max movie. Free market capitalism needs rules and regulations so we can all agree on what a dollar is and some tyrant doesn't use government to stomp competitors out. There's too much cronyism in our system now, corporations like Google and Microsoft are very much in bed with government and have more of a monopoly that the land barons did in the 1800s.

Unrestrained capitalism is anarchy?? Anarchy is not capitalism 1+1 = 2 capitalism is when you shop with your own money for the best price and quality and when you compete for customers against other suppliers on the basis of price and quality.

That is called a market, not capitalism. It's like you don't know the color of your true love's eyes. Do you understand? Should we start from the beginning?

If you have a market, then you have capitalism. There's no such thing as a "socialist market."

 

[Tehon]

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

In a Marxist society we would have an abundance of American made inexpensive goods. .

any reason to think that??? any reason at all??? I suppose you could say Cuba has an abundance of goods-right? 10% of what we have buut still an abundance if you are a libcommie utter fool

 

[Tehon]

There's no such thing as unrestrained capitalism. That would be anarchy, a Mad Max movie. Free market capitalism needs rules and regulations so we can all agree on what a dollar is and some tyrant doesn't use government to stomp competitors out. There's too much cronyism in our system now, corporations like Google and Microsoft are very much in bed with government and have more of a monopoly that the land barons did in the 1800s.

Unrestrained capitalism is anarchy?? Anarchy is not capitalism 1+1 = 2 capitalism is when you shop with your own money for the best price and quality and when you compete for customers against other suppliers on the basis of price and quality.

That is called a market, not capitalism. It's like you don't know the color of your true love's eyes. Do you understand? Should we start from the beginning?

If you have a market, then you have capitalism. There's no such thing as a "socialist market."

More nonsense!

 

[bripat9643]

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

They wouldn't under socialism. Government would be the only producer. Who would it trade with?

 

[Tehon]

In a Marxist society we would have an abundance of American made inexpensive goods. .

any reason to think that??? any reason at all???

The capitalist would be out of the picture.

 

[bripat9643]

There's no such thing as unrestrained capitalism. That would be anarchy, a Mad Max movie. Free market capitalism needs rules and regulations so we can all agree on what a dollar is and some tyrant doesn't use government to stomp competitors out. There's too much cronyism in our system now, corporations like Google and Microsoft are very much in bed with government and have more of a monopoly that the land barons did in the 1800s.

Unrestrained capitalism is anarchy?? Anarchy is not capitalism 1+1 = 2 capitalism is when you shop with your own money for the best price and quality and when you compete for customers against other suppliers on the basis of price and quality.

That is called a market, not capitalism. It's like you don't know the color of your true love's eyes. Do you understand? Should we start from the beginning?

If you have a market, then you have capitalism. There's no such thing as a "socialist market."

More nonsense!

No, that is simply the result of noting the definition of terms like "capitalism" and "socialism."

 

[bripat9643]

There's no such thing as unrestrained capitalism. That would be anarchy, a Mad Max movie. Free market capitalism needs rules and regulations so we can all agree on what a dollar is and some tyrant doesn't use government to stomp competitors out. There's too much cronyism in our system now, corporations like Google and Microsoft are very much in bed with government and have more of a monopoly that the land barons did in the 1800s.

Unrestrained capitalism is anarchy?? Anarchy is not capitalism 1+1 = 2 capitalism is when you shop with your own money for the best price and quality and when you compete for customers against other suppliers on the basis of price and quality.

That is called a market, not capitalism. It's like you don't know the color of your true love's eyes. Do you understand? Should we start from the beginning?

If you have a market, then you have capitalism. There's no such thing as a "socialist market."

More nonsense!

That's the result of committing logic.

 

[Tehon]

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

They wouldn't under socialism. Government would be the only producer. Who would it trade with?

Socialism isn't dependent on government any more than capitalism. Less so, I'm confident.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Socialism isn't dependent on government any more than capitalism.

actually under socialism govt owns major industries while under capitalism it does not. 1+1=2

 

[bripat9643]

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

They wouldn't under socialism. Government would be the only producer. Who would it trade with?

Socialism isn't dependent on government any more than capitalism. Less so, I'm confident.

Of course it is. Socialism is the system where government produces everything. How could it possibly not depend on government? Can you explain how socialism without government would work?

 

[Tehon]

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

They wouldn't under socialism. Government would be the only producer. Who would it trade with?

Socialism isn't dependent on government any more than capitalism.

actually under socialist govt owns major industries while under capitalism it does not. 1+1=2

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

They wouldn't under socialism. Government would be the only producer. Who would it trade with?

Government is not the producer in a Marxist economy.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Government is not the producer in a Marxist economy.

as owners and managers they are producers

 

[bripat9643]

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

They wouldn't under socialism. Government would be the only producer. Who would it trade with?

Socialism isn't dependent on government any more than capitalism.

actually under socialist govt owns major industries while under capitalism it does not. 1+1=2

It could work for a socialist society just the same. Without the capitalist! All the better.

you are talking stupid liberal gibberish. A capitalist market would not be used in a socialist society they would use a socialist market wherein everyone waits in line for cheap low quality low price and very scare goods and services. 1+1=2

The term "socialist market" is an oxymoron.

Nonsense. Where would our producers trade their goods if not a market?

They wouldn't under socialism. Government would be the only producer. Who would it trade with?

Government is not the producer in a Marxist economy.

Of course it is. Who is the producer if not the government?