I have had issues with Mint networking on multiple occasions. The issue was networking between Windows PCs and Linux PCs. Figuring out how to get it working properly was something that I am confident many PC users would not have been willing or able to deal with. I've had the same sorts of issues trying to get games to play on Linux. In the past week I've found videos that would not play on VLC on Linux, but played fine on VLC on Windows.
Linux does not have the support Windows does, it is not a type of OS most people are used to, so it is not as easy to use for most beginners.
People are welcome to chose what they want but the criticisms against Linux are often unfair and designed to scare people off in favor of the 800 lb. commercial gorilla. Propaganda in other words.
Networking? I never dicked around with it. I plug in the cable or click the my wifi once. If yours didn't network with Windows that's the fault of Linux?
The only videos I have had trouble with in the past is Adobe flash in a browser. Happened with Android as well. I don't know the ins and outs but heard flash has security issues and is being replaced. Commercial games developers are in bed with Microsoft, does that need to be explained? I personally would prefer a dedicated gaming machine but it's an unfair criticism against Linux distros.
It's not a matter of Linux being at fault, it's a matter of what people are willing to go out on a limb to try. If someone has a home network with multiple Windows computers, and they decide to try Linux on one computer, and that causes a networking problem.......even if the fault is with Windows, Linux is the "new" OS in that setup and is the one which will likely be blamed, or if not blamed, perhaps given up on because of the issue.
I am not commenting on the efficiency of Linux OS's for someone who is familiar with using them. I am saying that using Linux, even an OS as similar in form to Windows as Mint, can be difficult in certain situations, and I don't think the average PC user wants to have to deal with that sort of difficulty. I don't think the average PC user wants to have to spend the time to become familiar with a new OS, for that matter, even when it's a new Windows.
I suppose they could burn a iso dvd trip, fall on it and slice their neck open. Dangerous stuff!
I don't give a shit what the average pc users wants, fears, likes, hopes for, etc. Why are you throwing all tat drama at me? You MS boys are Moonies.
If I had a dollar for every hour that I had to dick around with Windows I could retire. Yet here you two are telling me not to believe my lying eyes.
The fact that obvious rubs your vagina the wrong way is that Linux is here, it works and does so very well, it's free as are numerous state of the art programs that run like greased lightening and install in seconds. Take Krita for example. Probably the best paint program around, Windows versions come out later since they are so good. Like Firefox, Thunderbird, etc.
If you come here and lie or misrepresent something that you apparently see as a threat I will call you on it, period.
What are you talking about? You are as bad in overreacting against any criticism or perceived criticism of Linux as any Microsoft fanboy.
I have said, more than once, that I use Linux. I have Mint loaded on two of the three computers I use. I dual boot with Win7 on this machine, and I have it on a laptop I use mostly as a media machine.
You may not give a shit what the average PC users want, but that's the basis of this entire line of conversation. IamwhatIseem said that if you took any 1000 people and gave them Linux Mint, they'd wonder why all computers don't use it. I disagreed, and still disagree, with that statement. It clearly has to do with the average PC user. If you don't give a shit, why are you inserting yourself into a conversation about average PC users?
I am not an "MS boy." I use Linux because I was hoping to get rid of Windows entirely. I found that dropping Windows was not a viable option for me, for a few reasons, but I still use Linux Mint, because it is a perfectly good OS, and it's free. It sometimes leads to problems, but I understood that would likely be the case going in. If Linux got the support that Windows does, if I could use it for games, for school, for all of the same things I use Windows for, without problems, I would. The reality is that I cannot.
If you want to argue that Linux is better than Windows, why don't you do that with someone who is actually saying how much better Windows is than Linux. The misrepresentation going on here is you misrepresenting what I have been saying.