Unintended consequences

[yidnar]

Yep, the Iranian diplomat stated that their uranium enrichment was for peaceful purposes. The response from Secretary of State, Rubio "If it was peaceful, you dont have to bury the plant 70 feet down". The terrorists lie just as much as democrats do.

facts .. but they're nowhere near as good at lying as the Dems ..

 

[kevinthrowe]

The Straits will be opened soon .. ships are avoiding it out of caution .. Iran is no longer capable of closing the Strait of Hormuz..

Considering America has war plans for everything, Iran most likely will be able to keep the straight closed. Japan had the plan to close the entrance of pearl. Dink a couple of ships as last resort

 

[yidnar]

Considering America has war plans for everything, Iran most likely will be able to keep the straight closed. Japan had the plan to close the entrance of pearl. Dink a couple of ships as last resort

Iran hasn't closed the straits .. ships are avoiding because of the conflict ..

 

[BothWings]

No, the catastrophe happened when B-2 bombers bunker busted it.

When did B2 bombers bomb a Japanese nuclear reactor?? You are LOST.

No, the catastrophe happened when B-2 bombers bunker busted it.

Really? The Fukushima reactor in Japan that I'm talking about was bombed by B2 bombers, not damaged by a tsunami? (Ok, I'd like some of what you're smoking, please. ) It is well documented that the Fukushima disaster could have been attenuated by the reactor being either deeper or even higher than it was. And for the record it was around 35m deep, so that's obviously not enough. So obviously burying reactors 70m deep is not a stupid move by any common sense safety measures whatsoever, whether the danger is from a tsunami or a foreign power bombing you.

Do catch up.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

When did B2 bombers bomb a Japanese nuclear reactor?? You are LOST.

Really? The Fukushima reactor in Japan that I'm talking about was bombed by B2 bombers, not damaged by a tsunami? (Ok, I'd like some of what you're smoking, please. ) It is well documented that the Fukushima disaster could have been attenuated by the reactor being either deeper or even higher than it was. And for the record it was around 35m deep, so that's obviously not enough. So obviously burying reactors 70m deep is not a stupid move by any common sense safety measures whatsoever, whether the danger is from a tsunami or a foreign power bombing you.

Do catch up.

I think you need to catch up, because i was talking about the 70 foot bunker in Iran that was decimated by B-2s. Sorry i didnt say it so a 5 year old would understand. I will try better.

By the way, if Japans nuclear facility was 70 ft down, the water still would of gotten in, and out, just like it did where it was at the time the tsunami hit.