Under Trump, things are getting out of hand. Much of what he promised has worked the opposite way.

You clearly skipped your How-to-Mow-Agents class.

To effectively do that you need to aim the car TOWARDS THEM, not away from them.

Driving off to the right of the agents does not mow them.
Sure glad we've got a great president in office now.
 
I'm someone with an SUV.

What you've just said is false
My wife is also 115 lbs. Stop deflecting from your terrorist bullshit.

There was no reason to think she was targeting someone with her SUV, she was fleeing with her SUV.
Her actions and subsequent acceleration forward towards the officer was certainly a dangerous. Officers had to act fast in order to eradicate the threat.

I'm someone with an SUV so what?



Babbit getting shot prevented the breach, this woman getting shot three times prevented nothing except her car avoiding a collision into a parked car in front.

Yeah, shooting an unarmed, 115 lb woman saved who? Who was she about to kill right in front of her and how? Your deranged theories are not reality. They are severe mental illness.
 
I p

I put up videos and articles that prove exactly the statements I made. Those videos came directly from Trumps mouth, so you cannot say they are lies or untruths. You have provided nothing, meaning your statements are not believedable. You are a fake. A Trump puppet
You posted:

Proof is that now the following agencies are for Trump (and the Republican supporters) and against everyone else:

1) the Attorney General Pam Bondi
2) the Supreme Court with 6 of the 9 judges favoring Trump
3) the loyalty over competence seen in all of Trump's cabinet
4) the 24 billionaires that represent companies like Apple and Google on Trump's side


where is the proof of this?
 
Her actions and subsequent acceleration forward towards the officer was certainly a dangerous. Officers had to act fast in order to eradicate the threat.

What threat is there from a car that is passing you by? The guy is clearly shooting from the side of the car that is getting away from him, not moving towards him.

1767897270789.webp


There is no credible threat, this is homicide and if you'd start using your head, instead of your politics, you would get that.
 
What threat is there from a car that is passing you by? The guy is clearly shooting from the side of the car that is getting away from him,
Stop showing still frames that were after the initial shooting. This fact alone proves you know you're a fraud.

And I'll ask you again about the other event. Who was imminently in danger from a 115 lb unarmed woman entering a building?


Scum
 
It was right at him when he fired through the windshield. We have the video.

Wrong again.

look at the hole, it's right by the driver side pillar, clearly shot came from the driver side fender of the car.

If the agent was shooting from the front of the car, then to make that hole the bullet would be angled at the pillar, not the driver.

1767897734448.webp


Not only that, agent also unloaded two more shots while the car was driving past him.

This is not defense, this is "I'm going to stop this ***** from fleeing by any means" homicide.
 
Last edited:
Wrong again.

If you look at hole right be the driver side pillar then clearly shot came from the driver side of car. If the agent was shooting from the front of the car, then the bullet would be hitting the pillar, not the driver.

View attachment 1203017

Not only that, agent also unloaded two more shots while the car was driving past him.
You believe showing a shot straight through a windshield helps your deranged conspiracies here?

Thanks for dunking on yourself, stupid!
 
You believe showing a shot straight through a windshield helps your deranged conspiracies here?

Thanks for dunking on yourself, stupid!

Ok I'm clearly dealing with a moron not capable of understanding basic geometry.

For everyone who can understand it, the bullet clearly needed to be shot from fender side for it to hit the driver in the head through that hole.
 
The woman was blocking the road and obstructing ICE from doing their job. She refused to obey lawful instructions from a Federal Law Enforcement Officer. She took off while the ICE Officer had his hand on her door handle and his arm in the vehicle

The bumper of her SUV grazed the leg on another ICE Officer and she was headed directly towards another ICE Officer

The ICE Officer did what he was trained to do. This is not anyone's fault but her fault

Democrats has declared war on law enforcement and the fuse is burning down
 
The video clearly shows the agent being struck by the car and then shooting her

You saw it and are ******* lying because you hate what is proven
1 hour ago — An analysis of video footage raises questions about claims by President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem about ...
You posted:

Proof is that now the following agencies are for Trump (and the Republican supporters) and against everyone else:

1) the Attorney General Pam Bondi

AI Overview


Yes,
Pam Bondi has shown strong, consistent favoritism and loyalty to Donald Trump through her public support, legal roles, and policy actions, including serving on his impeachment defense, promoting his election claims, and, as Attorney General, facing pressure to investigate political opponents at Trump's direction, fulfilling the profile of a loyalist, say analysts and cr
2) the Supreme Court with 6 of the 9 judges favoring Trump


AI Overview


The Supreme Court has issued numerous rulings and temporary orders that have largely favored Donald Trump's administration, particularly in his second term which began in January 2025. This trend has been noted by legal analysts and lower-court judges, who point to a high win rate for the administration in Supreme Court cases, often in contrast to decisions made by lower federal courts.
3) the loyalty over competence seen in all of Trump's cabinet


4) the 24 billionaires that represent companies like Apple and Google on Trump's side


AI Overview

The heads of major tech companies, including Apple CEO
Tim Cook and Google/Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, have engaged with and provided financial support to Donald Trump, especially around his 2025 inauguration. This interaction is generally seen as an effort to gain access and influence potential policies, rather than an explicit personal or ideological endorsement.
where is the proof of this?
 
The woman was blocking the road and obstructing ICE from doing their job

She was literally waving them through and there was another car that passed by her car right in front of those officers.

Instead of passing by, they got out of the car and started to approach her.
 
Ok I'm clearly dealing with a moron not capable of understanding basic geometry.

For everyone who can understand it, the bullet clearly needed to be shot from fender side for it to hit the driver in the head through that hole.
How the hell would a bullet go straight through the windshield and strike the driver from the side of the vehicle? Basically geometry indeed!

Now if the shooter was in front AND towards the driver's side that's possible.

You are an extra sort of stupid.
 
1 hour ago — An analysis of video footage raises questions about claims by President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem about ...
The video was clear. Kooks don't want to admit their anti-law enforcement rhetoric and attacks on officers has consequences.
 
1 hour ago — An analysis of video footage raises questions about claims by President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem about ...


AI Overview


Yes,
Pam Bondi has shown strong, consistent favoritism and loyalty to Donald Trump through her public support, legal roles, and policy actions, including serving on his impeachment defense, promoting his election claims, and, as Attorney General, facing pressure to investigate political opponents at Trump's direction, fulfilling the profile of a loyalist, say analysts and cr



AI Overview


The Supreme Court has issued numerous rulings and temporary orders that have largely favored Donald Trump's administration, particularly in his second term which began in January 2025. This trend has been noted by legal analysts and lower-court judges, who point to a high win rate for the administration in Supreme Court cases, often in contrast to decisions made by lower federal courts.






AI Overview

The heads of major tech companies, including Apple CEO
Tim Cook and Google/Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, have engaged with and provided financial support to Donald Trump, especially around his 2025 inauguration. This interaction is generally seen as an effort to gain access and influence potential policies, rather than an explicit personal or ideological endorsement.

What a pant load. The SCOTUS isn't doing Trumps bidding. As for Bondi, she works for the president. Maybe what you should do, is go thru Bidens term and do the same type of "fact check".
 
The video clearly shows the agent being struck by the car and then shooting her

You saw it and are ******* lying because you hate what is proven
Proof of what really happened

Minneapoliswoman.webp
 
15th post
What a pant load. The SCOTUS isn't doing Trumps bidding. As for Bondi, she works for the president. Maybe what you should do, is go thru Bidens term and do the same type of "fact check".
The Supreme Court has issued numerous rulings and temporary orders that have largely favored Donald Trump's administration, particularly in his second term which began in January 2025. This trend has been noted by legal analysts and lower-court judges, who point to a high win rate for the administration in Supreme Court cases, often in contrast to decisions made by lower federal courts.
 
The Supreme Court has issued numerous rulings and temporary orders that have largely favored Donald Trump's administration, particularly in his second term which began in January 2025. This trend has been noted by legal analysts and lower-court judges, who point to a high win rate for the administration in Supreme Court cases, often in contrast to decisions made by lower federal courts.
The lower courts need to start adhering to the Constitution more often if they don't want their rulings thrown out. This isn't rocket science.
 
Back
Top Bottom