Under Progressives/Obama the riches got richer, poorest got poorer

[rightwinger]

Now class......guess which slice of the pie Republicans want to get more money out of?

If you said the Bottom 40% that has two tenths a percent of the wealth.......YOU ARE CORRECT

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong, numskull. Right-wing policies are designed to make us all richer and freer.

LOL. Reality shows otherwise. The IMF and most studies show redistribution and reducing inequality with state intervention helps everyone.

Did you really expect a government agency to claim government policies are harmful to society?

The IMF and all studies you disagree with are propaganda to you, even though they base there analysis in factual reality. What the ****.

All studies that say socialism works are obvious propaganda because the proof that it doesn't work is so massive. What "facts" does the IMF use to support it's claim? Either they aren't facts or they don't support the case. In the first place, you can never use empirical data to prove an economic theory, so their claim is bogus on its face.

Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
Dispute any of the facts.

More propaganda.

 

[velvtacheeze]

so let's talk about who has the nerve to talk about their policies or claim they were sucessful ok?

you see people on the Left are too often likely to lie to themselves about the failed Left-wing agenda

We're under a GOP dominated Congress too. Can't do anything progressive with those clodhopping cavemen still trying to re-impose the 1920s on America.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Then why aren't conservatives praising Obama? Every economic policy conservatives support is designed to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Irony & hypocrisy

Which one suits YOU better?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Now class......guess which slice of the pie Republicans want to get more money out of?

If you said the Bottom 40% that has two tenths a percent of the wealth.......YOU ARE CORRECT

would be nice to see an overlay of education levels on that chart.
I wonder if there would be anything obvious that would stand out.

 

[bripat9643]

you mean like the "shovel-ready jobs"?

"Shovel-ready wasnt so shovel-ready?

Obama

Do you know waht shovel ready means?

It was not a promise of shovel ready jobs, it was a condition that projects must be "shovel ready" (ready to produce jobs) to receive federal funding

The Dims said there were plenty of them available, numskull.

No they didn't

The states were unable to come up with enough projects that qualified.....most Red states just pocketed the money

ROFL! Yes he certainly did.

Stimulus Bill Gives 'Shovel-Ready' Projects Priority​

As President Obama urges Congress to pass the $800 billion-plus stimulus package, one of his favorite selling points is the thousands of projects nationwide that he calls "shovel ready" — meaning planning is complete, approvals are secured and people could be put to work right away once funding is in place.​

These were anticipated projects that could qualify for stimulus funding. It was the resposibility of the individual states to come up with the projects not the federal government

Obama claimed these projects existed. He's responsible for his lies.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

OWS will return as soon as a member of the gop is elected to potus and not a moment before then.

 

[velvtacheeze]

OWS will return as soon as a member of the gop is elected to potus and not a moment before then.

Why shouldn't it? Everyone knows that any GOP President would love to be Wall Street's prison *****.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

OWS will return as soon as a member of the gop is elected to potus and not a moment before then.

Why shouldn't it? Everyone knows that any GOP President would love to be Wall Street's prison *****.

Unbelievable hypocrisy. Simply unbelievable

 

[rightwinger]

Now class......guess which slice of the pie Republicans want to get more money out of?

If you said the Bottom 40% that has two tenths a percent of the wealth.......YOU ARE CORRECT

would be nice to see an overlay of education levels on that chart.
I wonder if there would be anything obvious that would stand out.

Now class....guess which slice of the pie Democrats want to get more money out of?

If you said the top 5% that has 62% of the wealth....YOU ARE CORRECT

 

[NYcarbineer]

Then why aren't conservatives praising Obama? Every economic policy conservatives support is designed to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Irony & hypocrisy

Which one suits YOU better?

Why are conservatives attacking Obama with a charge that he's been doing something they would like to do if they were in power?

 

[bripat9643]

Now class......guess which slice of the pie Republicans want to get more money out of?

If you said the Bottom 40% that has two tenths a percent of the wealth.......YOU ARE CORRECT

would be nice to see an overlay of education levels on that chart.
I wonder if there would be anything obvious that would stand out.

Now class....guess which slice of the pie Democrats want to get more money out of?

If you said the top 5% that has 62% of the wealth....YOU ARE CORRECT

Thieves target the same slice and for the same reason. All you proved is that Democrats have the moral code of thieves.

 

[rightwinger]

Now class......guess which slice of the pie Republicans want to get more money out of?

If you said the Bottom 40% that has two tenths a percent of the wealth.......YOU ARE CORRECT

would be nice to see an overlay of education levels on that chart.
I wonder if there would be anything obvious that would stand out.

Now class....guess which slice of the pie Democrats want to get more money out of?

If you said the top 5% that has 62% of the wealth....YOU ARE CORRECT

Thieves target the same slice and for the same reason. All you proved is that Democrats have the moral code of thieves.

Ever hear the phrase.....you can't get blood out of a Turnip?

 

[David_42]

LOL. Reality shows otherwise. The IMF and most studies show redistribution and reducing inequality with state intervention helps everyone.

Did you really expect a government agency to claim government policies are harmful to society?

The IMF and all studies you disagree with are propaganda to you, even though they base there analysis in factual reality. What the ****.

All studies that say socialism works are obvious propaganda because the proof that it doesn't work is so massive. What "facts" does the IMF use to support it's claim? Either they aren't facts or they don't support the case. In the first place, you can never use empirical data to prove an economic theory, so their claim is bogus on its face.

Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
Dispute any of the facts.

More propaganda.

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

 

[BluesLegend]

There will never be income equality, sorry to burst your socialist bubble.

 

[David_42]

There will never be income equality, sorry to burst your socialist bubble.

No one wants income equality, that's impossible and ridiculous, what we do want is to address the GROWING inequality.

 

[Papageorgio]

OWS will return as soon as a member of the gop is elected to potus and not a moment before then.

Why shouldn't it? Everyone knows that any GOP President would love to be Wall Street's prison *****.

No more than Hillary and company.

 

[BluesLegend]

There will never be income equality, sorry to burst your socialist bubble.

No one wants income equality, that's impossible and ridiculous, what we do want is to address the GROWING inequality.

Not possible, the more you try the harder I work and the more I will hoard my wealth and pass any increases on to the poor and middle class.

 

[David_42]

There will never be income equality, sorry to burst your socialist bubble.

No one wants income equality, that's impossible and ridiculous, what we do want is to address the GROWING inequality.

Not possible, the more you try the harder I work and the more I will hoard my wealth and pass any increases on to the poor and middle class.

Wait, what? It is entirely possible to address growing inequality, people work hard their entire lives and don't move up, hard work is a ridiculous measurement.

 

[rightwinger]

There will never be income equality, sorry to burst your socialist bubble.

Of course not

But why would we continue policies that help only those that obviously don't need it?