Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #41
1/3 of what you are paying is wasted.so, you think its cheaper to pay for everyones insurance than it is to pay for the few that are treated without?Government should not be involved in health care at all. My health and my health choices are not the governments business or your responsibility to pay for.so in your words, the ill-considered regulations by the government twisted the health care industry and caused it to become out of control.
and this is the same government that you think is going to be able to save the industry that their regulations destroyed?
personally, I don't want some uneducated welfare queen making my health decisions.
all it took to have health insurance was to pay for it.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, but I don't think government should be involved with health care, or health insurance, at all. But if they are going to step into that arena, the last thing I want them to do is "partner" with private, for-profit companies. That kind of 'middle-ground' between capitalism and socialism is far worse than either extreme.
Not true, if you get run over in the street or drop from a heart attack the taxpayer pays for your immediate care, if you don't have insurance you get fixed in a public hospital paid for by the taxpayer.
The uninsured will get a bill, but those too cheap to buy insurance won't pay the bill, and there is no consequence, as in debtor's prisons, to enforce a civil judgment.
If they don't have insurance they should be stabilized and released. They should not be afforded the same care that I get with my paid for policy. Where is the incentive to earn your own way if everything is given to you free?
How does that help you?
Not wasted so much as redistributed to:
rising cost of healthcare graph - Google Search