Ukraine Whistleblower May Not Testify In Person

After the vote, they could not.
They absolutely could, if they don't include that power in the resolution that passes. And, even if it is included, they can still have a committee vote on each subpoena, blocking their subpoenas.

None of that happens if there are actual crimes reaching the level of impeachment. I do NOT support Trump. I believe him an immature worthless waste of oxygen but if there was anything here, there would have been a vote long ago.
 
Hillary would not testify if she were the President.
Of course she would. For 25 years she met the republican posse head on, and for 25 years she stomped them out. What would suddenly change? Nothing. You are diddling yourself with fantasies.
 
Hillary would not testify if she were the President.
Of course she would. For 25 years she met the republican posse head on, and for 25 years she stomped them out.

:auiqs.jpg:
When you are done cackling, feel free to show us the fruits of thise 25 years of investigations. You might want to also call Issa and Gowdy...maybe your fantasies will comfort them....

She's a protected species. For now.
 
Hillary would not testify if she were the President.
Of course she would. For 25 years she met the republican posse head on, and for 25 years she stomped them out.

:auiqs.jpg:
When you are done cackling, feel free to show us the fruits of thise 25 years of investigations. You might want to also call Issa and Gowdy...maybe your fantasies will comfort them....

She's a protected species. For now.
Protected by whom? You're delusional. Notice how you have to make up fantasies to back up your desperate nonsense. That should be a red flag for you.
 
Hillary would not testify if she were the President.
Of course she would. For 25 years she met the republican posse head on, and for 25 years she stomped them out.

:auiqs.jpg:
When you are done cackling, feel free to show us the fruits of thise 25 years of investigations. You might want to also call Issa and Gowdy...maybe your fantasies will comfort them....

She's a protected species. For now.
Protected by whom? You're delusional. Notice how you have to make up fantasies to back up your desperate nonsense. That should be a red flag for you.

The Establishment, which includes both Republicans and Democrats. She knows probably as well as Bill where all the bodies are buried.

What do you think Trump means by "draining the swamp"?
 
Deep State
wpnan191009.gif
 
Hillary would not testify if she were the President.
Of course she would. For 25 years she met the republican posse head on, and for 25 years she stomped them out.

:auiqs.jpg:
When you are done cackling, feel free to show us the fruits of thise 25 years of investigations. You might want to also call Issa and Gowdy...maybe your fantasies will comfort them....

She's a protected species. For now.
Protected by whom? You're delusional. Notice how you have to make up fantasies to back up your desperate nonsense. That should be a red flag for you.
Protected by the deep state - people like Comey, McCabe and Strozk.
 
Of course she would. For 25 years she met the republican posse head on, and for 25 years she stomped them out.

:auiqs.jpg:
When you are done cackling, feel free to show us the fruits of thise 25 years of investigations. You might want to also call Issa and Gowdy...maybe your fantasies will comfort them....

She's a protected species. For now.
Protected by whom? You're delusional. Notice how you have to make up fantasies to back up your desperate nonsense. That should be a red flag for you.
Protected by the deep state - people like Comey, McCabe and Strozk.
hahaha....sure. Barr seems to be in on it, too...no charges yet...oops, and trump hand picked barr....looks like Trump is in on it, too!

:auiqs.jpg:
 
When you are done cackling, feel free to show us the fruits of thise 25 years of investigations. You might want to also call Issa and Gowdy...maybe your fantasies will comfort them....

She's a protected species. For now.
Protected by whom? You're delusional. Notice how you have to make up fantasies to back up your desperate nonsense. That should be a red flag for you.
Protected by the deep state - people like Comey, McCabe and Strozk.
hahaha....sure. Barr seems to be in on it, too...no charges yet...oops, and trump hand picked barr....looks like Trump is in on it, too!

:auiqs.jpg:
You're babbling incoherently.
 
Just wait till the Senate gets a hold of him in a real impeachment. It's called subpoena and if the left can issue them, so can the right.

The left HAS to maintain this "inquiry" because they know damn good and well that a true vote of impeachment would give republicans subpoena rights and the last thing they want is any of these asshats behind this attack on Trump to have to go under oath.
But you won't have any problem with people ignoring congressional subpoenas if trump tells tells them to, right?
What subpoenas?
The ones that are coming.
None, in other words. Thanks for admitting it.
Stay tuned, DOUCHEBAG, they're coming.
 
what happened to The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him."
 
what happened to The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him."
Nothing happened to it. The impeachment inquiry is not a trial, or a criminal prosecution. Very simple.
 
Democrats are doing their damnedest to keep the inquiry illegitimate.

WASHINGTON—Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing


Ukraine Whistleblower May Not Testify In Person
Poor psycho. Donald and his lions need to be kept as far from
The whistleblower as possible.
 
what happened to The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him."
That’s only for a criminal trial you brain dead trumptard. The confrontation clause doesn’t apply.
Now stop discussing things you know nothing about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top