There is not a final agreement. There will be another conference in six weeks and a summit around the end of the year, but the reports out of Jeddah show a consensus that Ukraine's territorial integrity must be part of any peace agreement.
It's just empty talks and wishful thinking, all those "reports". Just a distraction.
Ok. The EU just need to find a way how to live without Russian coal, gas and oil, without African Uranium and without Ukrainian grain.
If that's what you need to believe, fine.
The fact that the EU is willing to live with these problems shows the strength of their commitment to help Ukraine defeat the Russian war criminals.
Do you think, that the Russian bomb Ukrainian ports just for lulz? Without any practical purpose?
It's not about the choice between living with problems or living without them. It's about the choice between living without Ukrainian problem or not living at all. And no, for many Europeans, even for some Krauts, meat of their tables and gas in their cars is much more important that the fate of another unlucky east-european clown-dictator.
It is an act of terrorism that has no effect on the progress of the war.
They should have think about 'terrorism' before attacking Russian transport infrastructure.
The Europeans will solve their current problems, but Russia will not be able to solve its growing problems.
The bridges are used to transport Russian troops and military supplies and that makes them legitimate military targets but the Ukrainian ports are not, and that makes bombing them acts of terrorism.
Bla-bla-bla. Anyway, the practical Russian "sanctions" against the EU grain supply may make them more perceptable.
Germany is suffering because it foolishly allowed itself to become dependent on Russian fuel, but Putin taught Germany that trade with Putin's Russia is a threat to its national security so it will never be restored. Germany is building lng terminals so it will soon receive as much natural gas as it needs, and, imo, it will also decide to go back to using nuclear energy.
Do you really believe that it's more difficult to destroy the terminals that it was to destroy the pipes? If the attacks on the German fuel supply infrastructure are allowed, they are allowed to both sides.
Do you wake up this stupid in the morning or do you have to work at it? Striking the lng terminals would be an act of war against NATO and every military asset in Russia would become a legitimate military target for NATO missiles and bombers.
