U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear gun rights cases

[August West]

The Heller decision said that we can continue to regulate guns. What is so hard to understand about that?

 

[pknopp]

I'm surprised they turned them all away.

I'm glad they did.

They just upheld existing case law and the constitution.

The constitution gives the government the right to regulate commerce. Selling and buying a weapon is commerce.

There is no place in the constitution that says the government can't regulate weapons, sales of weapons or weapon permits.

The people have a right to know why people feel the need to carry a concealed or open carry a weapon. I applaud New Jersey for having that law. Telling the state the reason for actions isn't unconstitutional or denying anyone a weapon.

I applaud all states that put proper safety laws and regulations on weapons.

I don't want the states regulating rights.

 

[OnePercenter]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

Wrong again....... you have a 4/4 split on guns....4 left wing asshats vs. 4 real Justices...and neither side is willing to give Roberts the deciding vote on the gun cases. Trump needs to replace ginsburg and the other left wing moron if he wins re-election...which is the reason to vote for him and every lick spittle, spineless, weak Republican senator....he needs a majority to in order to replace the anti-American justices.

No matter how much you bitch, moan, and whine, those with criminal records will not receive a gun permit.

 

[OnePercenter]

I'm surprised they turned them all away.

I'm glad they did.

They just upheld existing case law and the constitution.

The constitution gives the government the right to regulate commerce. Selling and buying a weapon is commerce.

There is no place in the constitution that says the government can't regulate weapons, sales of weapons or weapon permits.

The people have a right to know why people feel the need to carry a concealed or open carry a weapon. I applaud New Jersey for having that law. Telling the state the reason for actions isn't unconstitutional or denying anyone a weapon.

I applaud all states that put proper safety laws and regulations on weapons.

I don't want the states regulating rights.

Why?

 

[pknopp]

I'm surprised they turned them all away.

I'm glad they did.

They just upheld existing case law and the constitution.

The constitution gives the government the right to regulate commerce. Selling and buying a weapon is commerce.

There is no place in the constitution that says the government can't regulate weapons, sales of weapons or weapon permits.

The people have a right to know why people feel the need to carry a concealed or open carry a weapon. I applaud New Jersey for having that law. Telling the state the reason for actions isn't unconstitutional or denying anyone a weapon.

I applaud all states that put proper safety laws and regulations on weapons.

I don't want the states regulating rights.

Why?

You want to have to explain to the government why you feel you need to freely speak?

 

[whitehall]

Maybe they are waiting for Ginsburg to die before they rule on anything substantial.

 

[007]

Since the new radical democrat party has decided to join the anarchist calls to disband the police, there's been $1.8M in new gun sales.

Democrats are always the best sales people for gun sales.

 

[OnePercenter]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

The courts are busy today but don't want to further cases on guns. Sounds normal.

The Supreme Court doesn't want suits brought by Putin.

 

[OnePercenter]

Since the new radical democrat party has decided to join the anarchist calls to disband the police, there's been $1.8M in new gun sales.

Democrats are always the best sales people for gun sales.

Putin is proud of you.

 

[007]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

The courts are busy today but don't want to further cases on guns. Sounds normal.

The Supreme Court doesn't want suits brought by Putin.


View attachment 350664View attachment 350665

Is Putin your daddy, or did he just crawl up your ass and die?

 

[OnePercenter]

I'm surprised they turned them all away.

I'm glad they did.

They just upheld existing case law and the constitution.

The constitution gives the government the right to regulate commerce. Selling and buying a weapon is commerce.

There is no place in the constitution that says the government can't regulate weapons, sales of weapons or weapon permits.

The people have a right to know why people feel the need to carry a concealed or open carry a weapon. I applaud New Jersey for having that law. Telling the state the reason for actions isn't unconstitutional or denying anyone a weapon.

I applaud all states that put proper safety laws and regulations on weapons.

I don't want the states regulating rights.

Why?

You want to have to explain to the government why you feel you need to freely speak?

The issue is CCW. Please try and focus. Again, why shouldn't a State regulate a CCW permit?

 

[007]

I'm surprised they turned them all away.

I'm glad they did.

They just upheld existing case law and the constitution.

The constitution gives the government the right to regulate commerce. Selling and buying a weapon is commerce.

There is no place in the constitution that says the government can't regulate weapons, sales of weapons or weapon permits.

The people have a right to know why people feel the need to carry a concealed or open carry a weapon. I applaud New Jersey for having that law. Telling the state the reason for actions isn't unconstitutional or denying anyone a weapon.

I applaud all states that put proper safety laws and regulations on weapons.

I don't want the states regulating rights.

Why?

You want to have to explain to the government why you feel you need to freely speak?

The issue is CCW. Please try and focus. Again, why shouldn't a State regulate a CCW permit?

Did Putin tell you to ask that?

 

[pknopp]

I'm surprised they turned them all away.

I'm glad they did.

They just upheld existing case law and the constitution.

The constitution gives the government the right to regulate commerce. Selling and buying a weapon is commerce.

There is no place in the constitution that says the government can't regulate weapons, sales of weapons or weapon permits.

The people have a right to know why people feel the need to carry a concealed or open carry a weapon. I applaud New Jersey for having that law. Telling the state the reason for actions isn't unconstitutional or denying anyone a weapon.

I applaud all states that put proper safety laws and regulations on weapons.

I don't want the states regulating rights.

Why?

You want to have to explain to the government why you feel you need to freely speak?

The issue is CCW. Please try and focus. Again, why shouldn't a State regulate a CCW permit?

I answered your question. You should not have to explain to anyone why you want to exercise your rights.

 

[excalibur]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

You read this, that indicate that the second amendment is being ignored?

In the New Jersey case, the justices left in place a lower court ruling that threw out a lawsuit challenging the state’s law mandating that people who want to carry handguns in public must show they have a special reason before they can get a permit.

The state seems to require an explanation for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon, when they already have that right according to the second amendment.

New Jersey is full of cow shit!

Yep, the Right to keep and to bear arms.

You keep them in your home, you bear them outside.

SCOTUS keeps allowing states and municipalities to take away the most fundamental of our Rights.

Meanwhile, six Justices take a statute form the 1960's and now claim it protects LGBTQWXYZ people.

 

[OnePercenter]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

The courts are busy today but don't want to further cases on guns. Sounds normal.

The Supreme Court doesn't want suits brought by Putin.


View attachment 350664View attachment 350665

Is Putin your daddy, or did he just crawl up your ass and die?

Unlike you, I don't condone support of any organization that welcomes Russian spy's.

 

[007]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

The courts are busy today but don't want to further cases on guns. Sounds normal.

The Supreme Court doesn't want suits brought by Putin.


View attachment 350664View attachment 350665

Is Putin your daddy, or did he just crawl up your ass and die?

Unlike you, I don't condone support of any organization that welcomes Russian spy's.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

[OnePercenter]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

The courts are busy today but don't want to further cases on guns. Sounds normal.

The Supreme Court doesn't want suits brought by Putin.


View attachment 350664View attachment 350665

Is Putin your daddy, or did he just crawl up your ass and die?

Unlike you, I don't condone support of any organization that welcomes Russian spy's.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

You support Russia and Putin. Interesting.

 

[freyasman]

Where do you suppose Ruth Bader Ginsburg gets the virgin's blood for those transfusions which are the only thing keeping her ancient ass alive, anyway?

Never mind, off topic....

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of new cases seeking to expand gun rights."

U.S. Supreme Court turns away 10 gun rights cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a series of cases seeking to expand gun rights, showing that even with its conservative majority it remains hesitant about wading into the contentious issue.

www.reuters.com

A majority of the justices are clearly content with current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Court also seems content with allowing the states to regulate firearms as they see fit, save for the prohibition of handguns.

Sounds fine to me.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I'm surprised they turned them all away.

I'm not.....the 4 actual Justices, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and possibly Kavanaugh do not know it they can trust Roberts......likely they now do not trust Roberts and don't want to take the chance he will violate the Constitution...again. The 4 anti-American Justices....they don't trust Roberts either.......so we have the stalemate again, thanks to George Bush and his pick....

That's an interesting argument........just for discussion I will note that Roberts sided with Heller.

Don't you just hate it when all roads lead back to Heller V DC?