U.S. Latino Activist Group Says States Sending Law Enforcement To The Border To Help USBP Are Committing 'Insurrection'

[Decus]

Immigration law? I have no idea but it's definitely a possible violation of the Constitution depending on what they are doing. The Constitution clearly makes immigration solely a Federal Issue.

Immigration law consists of rules and procedures to be enforced by the federal government. That is no longer happening.

Ergo, what we have now is not immigration, but a criminal exercise. If the feds won't enforce the law to the detriment of the states, then it falls to the states to deal with the resulting situation.

Just because the Fed isn't doing what you want that does nothing to negate the Constitution.

Why do you keep bringing up the Constitution?/ The Federal government gave immigration powers to the Federal government, not the Constitution:

"The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, …”."

"The 14th Amendment, Section 1 addresses the protection of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,…” which extended citizenship through the States to the former slaves. The rules of immigration were reserved to the

States through the 10th Amendment until the first Federal law was enacted in 1875. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the following year that immigration regulation was an exclusive Federal responsibility. Congress established the Immigration Service in 1891, which was the first time the Federal government took an active role. Congress enacted additional quota systems after World War I in the years 1921 and 1924."

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration?

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration? Answer – The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of...

theamericanview.com

.

Why? Multiple court rulings and the fact that Sheriff Arpaio was arrested and found guilty because he thought he could enforce immigration laws.

You are using the same argument that those who argue that the 2nd doesn't necessarily mean the people but rather only militia's.

You won't be able to show where state officials are actually doing anything.

Again - it's NOT a Constitutional power given to the Federal government. The Federal government enacted a law to assume that power.

.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Latino activist group alleges states sending law enforcement to border engaging in 'insurrection'​

-- Several states have sent officers and National Guard members to assist at the border​

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is calling on President Biden to stop governors of several states from sending law enforcement officers and National Guard members to the southern border.

In a letter sent to the White House on Sunday, LULAC National President Domingo Garcia called out Texas, Arizona, Nebraska, Idaho, Florida and South Dakota for sending personnel to the border, claiming that it was an "insurrection" by a group of states improperly using their resources.

Both Illegals and the Biden administration are violating US immigration Laws....and states across the US are sending Law enforcement officers to the southern border to help overwhelmed US BP.

This Latino Activist group is asking Biden to step in and stop states from sending their law enforcement officers to the border.

Latino activist group alleges states sending law enforcement to border engaging in 'insurrection'

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is calling on President Biden to stop governors of several states from sending law enforcement officers and National Guard members to the southern border.

www.foxnews.com

I thought for sure after reading the title that this was going to be a Babylonbee article.

Race based organizations are racist.
The League of United Latin American Citizens is one of many racist Latino nationalist groups that want to change the US into a Latino country.
All countries control their border crossing, ports of entry and immigration.
Bring opposed to controlling our borders and immigration is racism.
The Democrat Party is a racist organization that panders to racist.

 

[Unkotare]

Moonglow
It’s a trash language of peasants

Now your bigotry extends to languages? Do you have any idea how stupid that is?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

People illegally entering our country are breaking the law and are akin to drug smugglers or human traffickers. They should be thrown in jail and deported to their country of origin.

.

deportation is up to the feds not the states.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Immigration law? I have no idea but it's definitely a possible violation of the Constitution depending on what they are doing. The Constitution clearly makes immigration solely a Federal Issue.

Immigration law consists of rules and procedures to be enforced by the federal government. That is no longer happening.

Ergo, what we have now is not immigration, but a criminal exercise. If the feds won't enforce the law to the detriment of the states, then it falls to the states to deal with the resulting situation.

Just because the Fed isn't doing what you want that does nothing to negate the Constitution.

Why do you keep bringing up the Constitution?/ The Federal government gave immigration powers to the Federal government, not the Constitution:

"The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, …”."

"The 14th Amendment, Section 1 addresses the protection of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,…” which extended citizenship through the States to the former slaves. The rules of immigration were reserved to the

States through the 10th Amendment until the first Federal law was enacted in 1875. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the following year that immigration regulation was an exclusive Federal responsibility. Congress established the Immigration Service in 1891, which was the first time the Federal government took an active role. Congress enacted additional quota systems after World War I in the years 1921 and 1924."

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration?

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration? Answer – The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of...

theamericanview.com

.

Why? Multiple court rulings and the fact that Sheriff Arpaio was arrested and found guilty because he thought he could enforce immigration laws.

You are using the same argument that those who argue that the 2nd doesn't necessarily mean the people but rather only militia's.

You won't be able to show where state officials are actually doing anything.

Again - it's NOT a Constitutional power given to the Federal government. The Federal government enacted a law to assume that power.

.

After 1808 the constitution clearly gives the fed the power.

 

[pknopp]

Immigration law? I have no idea but it's definitely a possible violation of the Constitution depending on what they are doing. The Constitution clearly makes immigration solely a Federal Issue.

Immigration law consists of rules and procedures to be enforced by the federal government. That is no longer happening.

Ergo, what we have now is not immigration, but a criminal exercise. If the feds won't enforce the law to the detriment of the states, then it falls to the states to deal with the resulting situation.

Just because the Fed isn't doing what you want that does nothing to negate the Constitution.

Why do you keep bringing up the Constitution?/ The Federal government gave immigration powers to the Federal government, not the Constitution:

"The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, …”."

"The 14th Amendment, Section 1 addresses the protection of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,…” which extended citizenship through the States to the former slaves. The rules of immigration were reserved to the

States through the 10th Amendment until the first Federal law was enacted in 1875. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the following year that immigration regulation was an exclusive Federal responsibility. Congress established the Immigration Service in 1891, which was the first time the Federal government took an active role. Congress enacted additional quota systems after World War I in the years 1921 and 1924."

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration?

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration? Answer – The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of...

theamericanview.com

.

Why? Multiple court rulings and the fact that Sheriff Arpaio was arrested and found guilty because he thought he could enforce immigration laws.

You are using the same argument that those who argue that the 2nd doesn't necessarily mean the people but rather only militia's.

You won't be able to show where state officials are actually doing anything.

Again - it's NOT a Constitutional power given to the Federal government. The Federal government enacted a law to assume that power.

.

Chapter 2: The source and scope of the federal power to regulate immigration and naturalization

 

[RetiredGySgt]

pknopp I have found that no amount of links knowledge or facts have ever convinced those that make the claim the Constitution does not cover this. The people that make that claim willfully ignore what is written,

 

[justoffal]

Latino activist group alleges states sending law enforcement to border engaging in 'insurrection'​

-- Several states have sent officers and National Guard members to assist at the border​

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is calling on President Biden to stop governors of several states from sending law enforcement officers and National Guard members to the southern border.

In a letter sent to the White House on Sunday, LULAC National President Domingo Garcia called out Texas, Arizona, Nebraska, Idaho, Florida and South Dakota for sending personnel to the border, claiming that it was an "insurrection" by a group of states improperly using their resources.

Both Illegals and the Biden administration are violating US immigration Laws....and states across the US are sending Law enforcement officers to the southern border to help overwhelmed US BP.

This Latino Activist group is asking Biden to step in and stop states from sending their law enforcement officers to the border.

Latino activist group alleges states sending law enforcement to border engaging in 'insurrection'

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is calling on President Biden to stop governors of several states from sending law enforcement officers and National Guard members to the southern border.

www.foxnews.com

Yep.... the massive increase in cash grabbing that has been a result of increased mule traffic must be driving the cartel puppets in our traitorous congress crazy. Eating into their vacation money.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The border stampede is an invasion and supporting it is an insurrection.

 

[justoffal]

Latino activist group alleges states sending law enforcement to border engaging in 'insurrection'​

-- Several states have sent officers and National Guard members to assist at the border​

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is calling on President Biden to stop governors of several states from sending law enforcement officers and National Guard members to the southern border.

In a letter sent to the White House on Sunday, LULAC National President Domingo Garcia called out Texas, Arizona, Nebraska, Idaho, Florida and South Dakota for sending personnel to the border, claiming that it was an "insurrection" by a group of states improperly using their resources.

Both Illegals and the Biden administration are violating US immigration Laws....and states across the US are sending Law enforcement officers to the southern border to help overwhelmed US BP.

This Latino Activist group is asking Biden to step in and stop states from sending their law enforcement officers to the border.

Latino activist group alleges states sending law enforcement to border engaging in 'insurrection'

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is calling on President Biden to stop governors of several states from sending law enforcement officers and National Guard members to the southern border.

www.foxnews.com

The Border Patrol chief has the authority to deputize and just for the record not even the PRESIDENT can take that away from him.

JO

 

[22lcidw]

This is really just another political stunt by the Repubs.

Just like you hate law enforcement that used to be called police, you will hate politicians who will be called lawmakers. Progs have had a heavy hand in what we see today. The good matched with turmoil. And the turmoil will eventually win out because it always has. We are abdicating our number one spot in the world as just one consequence.

 

[easyt65]

A Federal Court makes that determination.

The definition of an illegal / non-citizen has already decided what constitutes a legal citizen and an illegal, numbnuts.

p

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Everything is an insurrection now, the result of leftists making liberal definitions to sound cool and treasuring victim roles.

But remember, leftists don't dumb people down, they're just 'progressive"

 

[easyt65]

Everything is an insurrection now, the result of leftists making liberal definitions to sound cool and treasuring victim roles.

But remember, leftists don't dumb people down, they're just 'progressive"

From 'Racist' to 'Infrastructure' to 'Insurrection', Marxist Democrats and snowflakes have to attempt to redefine everything or they have absolutely no legitimate point and their claims collapse.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

pknopp Then how come MFer States are having to control their own border and suffer/pay the consequences of a pussified Demonicrat border?

Let's not pretend the Federal govt. is competent or reasonable in any way. If you haven't noticed a puppet with dementia and his lowest of character side-kick are "in-charge".

 

[justinacolmena]

Race based organizations are racist.
The League of United Latin American Citizens is one of many racist Latino nationalist groups that want to change the US into a Latino country.

Southwestern U.S. has been Latino country since before the Mexican-American War.

You're not going to change people's race, but technically Latinos are of the same Caucasian race as white people, Indians, and Native Americans.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Everything is an insurrection now, the result of leftists making liberal definitions to sound cool and treasuring victim roles.

But remember, leftists don't dumb people down, they're just 'progressive"

From 'Racist' to 'Infrastructure' to 'Insurrection', Marxist Democrats and snowflakes have to attempt to redefine everything or they have absolutely no legitimate point and their claims collapse.

Victim-role acquiring + cowardly + dishonest + lazy + unwise + dependent = "Progressive".

They speak in antonyms, there's nothing progressive about today's leftist.

 

[Unkotare]

We need millions of more Latinos !?
I can barely even hear English any more

It’s like I am living in Latin America

We didn't need YOU, but we let you stay despite your total lack of any redeeming qualities.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Immigration law? I have no idea but it's definitely a possible violation of the Constitution depending on what they are doing. The Constitution clearly makes immigration solely a Federal Issue.

this is what happens when the feds aint doing their job.....sooner or later the peons are going to start doing it themselves....they have been talking about immigration for at least 30 years.....now its either help or get the fuck out of the way.....

 

[Decus]

Immigration law? I have no idea but it's definitely a possible violation of the Constitution depending on what they are doing. The Constitution clearly makes immigration solely a Federal Issue.

Immigration law consists of rules and procedures to be enforced by the federal government. That is no longer happening.

Ergo, what we have now is not immigration, but a criminal exercise. If the feds won't enforce the law to the detriment of the states, then it falls to the states to deal with the resulting situation.

Just because the Fed isn't doing what you want that does nothing to negate the Constitution.

Why do you keep bringing up the Constitution?/ The Federal government gave immigration powers to the Federal government, not the Constitution:

"The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, …”."

"The 14th Amendment, Section 1 addresses the protection of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,…” which extended citizenship through the States to the former slaves. The rules of immigration were reserved to the

States through the 10th Amendment until the first Federal law was enacted in 1875. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the following year that immigration regulation was an exclusive Federal responsibility. Congress established the Immigration Service in 1891, which was the first time the Federal government took an active role. Congress enacted additional quota systems after World War I in the years 1921 and 1924."

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration?

What Authority Does the U.S. Constitution Give the Federal Government Regarding Immigration? Answer – The word “immigration” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution or any of its Amendments. Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 does read, “… To establish an uniform Rule of...

theamericanview.com

.

Why? Multiple court rulings and the fact that Sheriff Arpaio was arrested and found guilty because he thought he could enforce immigration laws.

You are using the same argument that those who argue that the 2nd doesn't necessarily mean the people but rather only militia's.

You won't be able to show where state officials are actually doing anything.

Again - it's NOT a Constitutional power given to the Federal government. The Federal government enacted a law to assume that power.

.

Chapter 2: The source and scope of the federal power to regulate immigration and naturalization

From your own link:

Throughout the history of the United States the Supreme Court has upheld all manner of federal statutes regulating immigration. By contrast, Supreme Court decisions preclude states from passing legislation that directly impinges on this area of federal dominion. The Supreme Court’s basis for action is clear when the area regulated is naturalization. Article 1, § 8, clause 4, of the United States Constitution specifically grants Congress the power to establish a "uniform Rule of Naturalization." By expressly allocating this power to Congress, the Constitution prevents the confusion that would result if individual states could bestow citizenship. The Constitution does not, however, explicitly provide that the power to deny admission or remove non-citizens rests with the federal government as opposed to state governments. Hence, in the early immigration cases the Supreme Court faced the problem of identifying the source of the federal government's exclusive and plenary power over immigration. Later cases found the plenary power to be an inherent sovereign power.

.