U.S. hasn’t seen an EF5 tornado in 11 years, longest gap in history

Too few E-5 tornadoes proves climate change. The ‘experts’ warned us this was going to happen. If only we had listened and taken action.



jives perfectly with DECLINING SURFACE AIR PRESSURE....
 
Like any storm, one tornado occurring within a certain period of time is simply weather. Likewise, the lack of one tornado occurring within a certain time period is just weather.

The Industrial Revolution significantly increased greenhouse gas emissions due to people extracting carbon from below the Earth's surface and burning it in the form of various fossil fuels for heat and power generation, the exhaust being released at or above the surface.
For all but idiots, this prolonged activity has predictably increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations leading to increased average global warming. An increase in global climate change follows logically from any prolonged increase in global warming.



So if "the Earth is warming" and "the ice is melting"

WHY IS SURFACE AIR PRESSURE FLAT TO DOWN????
 
Too few E-5 tornadoes proves climate change. The ‘experts’ warned us this was going to happen. If only we had listened and taken action.

Clearly this can only mean that the hurricanes are DENIERS!!
 
"Severe storms" are not "tornadoes"

It's not a difficult concept. Even you're smart enough to understand it. You're lying deliberately, out of raging butthurt, and because the cult commands it.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Your stupidity on steroids as Tornadoes are classified as severe storms unless you don't think 200+ mph is a dangerous wind force that can take entire houses off the foundations or drive straws into tree trunks.

:cuckoo:

From the NOAA where they classify Tornadoes as SEVERE WEATHER,

SEVERE WEATHER 101​

Frequently Asked Questions about Tornadoes​


LINK
 
So now you are back on the Global Warming bandwagon? Is Climate Change no longer in vogue?
Your side invented that phrase.

Did your masters not tell you that? Of course they didn't. They like keeping you stupid, and you like being stupid.

Anyways, what did that generic whine have to do with anything? Everyone already knows you're butthurt.
 
You got busted for being a moron.

Stop crying about it already. Remember, this isn't WUWT. Stupidity gets laughed at instead of praised.

If you want me to stop mocking you for being so goddamned stupid, stop being so goddamned stupid.

Bla bla bla is all you have left after I schooled you over your idiotic statement you made, this is what YOU wrote:

"Severe storms" are not "tornadoes"


Tornadoes comes from severe thunderstorms which is why it is called SEVERE WEATHER as stated by the NOAA.

SEVERE WEATHER 101​


Frequently Asked Questions about Tornadoes​

If your question is not answered below, check this excellent, comprehensive list of tornado FAQs from the NOAA Storm Prediction Center.

Where do tornadoes come from?Tornadoes come from the energy released in a thunderstorm. As powerful as they are, tornadoes account for only a tiny fraction of the energy in a thunderstorm. What makes them dangerous is that their energy is concentrated in a small area, perhaps only a hundred yards across. Not all tornadoes are the same, of course, and science does not yet completely understand how part of a thunderstorm's energy sometimes gets focused into something as small as a tornado.

============

It is YOU who is massively STUPID for denying elementary knowledge known for centuries.
 
AGW theory doesn't predict more tornadoes. It never has.

Keep trying. But maybe learn the basics first.
Yes they have - but then in the same paragraph also say it may suppress them.
Very-very typical of climate change drum beaters - to claim both sides of a condition, so no matter what - "I told you so!!:


 
Too few E-5 tornadoes proves climate change. The ‘experts’ warned us this was going to happen. If only we had listened and taken action.

RACIST! YOU ARE A RACIST! THE WEATHER IS RACIST! EVERYBODY IS RACIST! RACISTS ARE RACISTS! TORNADOES ARE RACISTS!
 
AGW theory doesn't predict more tornadoes. It never has.

Keep trying. But maybe learn the basics first.
Of Course it does. It predicts greater differentiation in temperature fronts leading to higher energy storm systems.
This does not seem to have been the case.
 
Too few tornados, that's climate change.
Too many tornadoes, that's climate change.
It rained today, that's climate change
It didn't rain today, that's climate change.
It's warm today, that's climate change.
It's cold today, that's climate change.
Windy today, that's climate change.
Wasn't windy yesterday, that's climate change.

What it is today, it's climate change.
What it was yesterday, that was climate change.
 
Too few tornados, that's climate change.
Too many tornadoes, that's climate change.
It rained today, that's climate change
It didn't rain today, that's climate change.
It's warm today, that's climate change.
It's cold today, that's climate change.
Windy today, that's climate change.
Wasn't windy yesterday, that's climate change.

What it is today, it's climate change.
What it was yesterday, that was climate change.
RACIST! YOU'RE A RACIST! LOOK SOMEBODY....A RACIST.
THE WIND. IS RACIST...TORNADOES ARE RACIST...RAIN IS RACIST!!!
RAAAAAAAAAACIST!!!!
 
Of Course it does. It predicts greater differentiation in temperature fronts leading to higher energy storm systems.
That news would surprise all the climate scientists.

There's a reason none of you can come up with anyone predicting more tornadoes. It didn't happen. Y'all are just making stuff up. Again. As is the case every time it happens, that only makes you look bad.

And yeah, I get it. Deniers can't argue against the actual science, and their cult forbids them from admitting that, so they see making crazy stories up as their only viable option.
 

Forum List

Back
Top