shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 37,981
- 36,513
- 2,905
- Thread starter
- #21
So.....you have a nut....a nut banned from buying, owning or carrying a gun......who has a gun because he got it illegally.
He is going around shooting people....people who don't have their own guns so they are easy to shoot and kill.
The police, the ones the anti-gun extremists tell us should be the only ones to have access to guns........don't tell the people there is a nut with an illegal gun running and driving around murdering people...so they don't even know to lock their own doors or to hide....
So...gun control in Canada worked exactly as designed.....good people did not have guns ......the police had guns....... the killer had gun/guns......... it worked like a charm.
Check out this video of this guy Clinton Ellison from the 6 min mark, on about his anger about the lack of police response. This guy laid in the woods for hours while he was hunted by the gunman still no police showed up:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova...ass-shooting-brother-clinton-hiding-1.5541082
Sadly, in terms of the impact it had, some of this is true. It was a rural town, which in America is exactly the kind of place where citizens own guns. I recall the guy responsible for the Texas church attack was shot by a resident who was armed after a short chase. Another gunman in some other church was shot by someone carrying a gun in the church.
The worst part about this for Canadians, and there was one guy who lost his disabled brother to this animal and had to hide in the forest will the madman was looking for him with a flashlight and express it angrily, is that the police didn't alert citizens. On top of that, it tooks hours to respond. As this guy said, "I was out there looking for my brother and I didn't have a gun or kevlar. Why weren't the police out there?" That is the danger of relying on others to protect your life.
Bill Blair, who is the public safety minister currently and was a former cop and chief of Toronto police has stated he is going to push the gun safety measurements through. I wonder if he believes that since people won't have guns, we don't need police to have any?
I'm not a gun guy. Don't own one, don't know much about them. I do feel that broad, blanket laws that hurt liberty and law abiding citizens while doing little to harm the actual criminals, are ill conceived.
Last edited: