Two New Yorkers who moved to my area saw explosions bring down World Trade Centers

[DiveCon]

The goal in Afghanistan was a pipeline deal with the Taliban who, by early August, were proving so vexing that State Department negotiator, Christine Rocca, clarified their options:

"Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold or we bury you under a carpet of bombs."

When Bush received word of the Taliban's refusal he allegedly "...informed Pakistan and India that the US would launch a military mission into Afghanistan before the end of October."

Five weeks before 9/11.

ROFL!

Hilarious!

Yeah, that's right, it was over a pipeline.

Twoofer questioning: "Is energy in anyway connected to this random series of events?" Answer, "Yes. There is a $3 billion pipeline proposed by Chevron." Twoofer logic, "A-HA! That proves it! The Bush/Cheney/Republican/Fed/Bilderbergs are behind it and evil!"

Twoofers will believe anything.

Except physics, engineering, and thermodynamics.

but then they would have to actually admit they are wrong

 

[Toro]

The goal in Afghanistan was a pipeline deal with the Taliban who, by early August, were proving so vexing that State Department negotiator, Christine Rocca, clarified their options:

"Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold or we bury you under a carpet of bombs."

When Bush received word of the Taliban's refusal he allegedly "...informed Pakistan and India that the US would launch a military mission into Afghanistan before the end of October."

Five weeks before 9/11.

ROFL!

Hilarious!

Yeah, that's right, it was over a pipeline.

Twoofer questioning: "Is energy in anyway connected to this random series of events?" Answer, "Yes. There is a $3 billion pipeline proposed by Chevron." Twoofer logic, "A-HA! That proves it! The Bush/Cheney/Republican/Fed/Bilderbergs are behind it and evil!"

Twoofers will believe anything.

Except physics, engineering, and thermodynamics.

I owe you rep for that!

 

[georgephillip]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

 

[Toro]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

Well, I had friends die in the WTC and I nearly went to work for a firm there nine months prior to 9/11, so I think I can say that its not 9/11 we are laughing at - its the silly theories.

 

[elvis]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

Well, I had friends die in the WTC and I nearly went to work for a firm there nine months prior to 9/11, so I think I can say that its not 9/11 we are laughing at - its the silly theories.

sorry to hear that.
which floor would you have worked in?

 

[DiveCon]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

you want to be taken seriously?
stop supporting terrorists

 

[Toro]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

Well, I had friends die in the WTC and I nearly went to work for a firm there nine months prior to 9/11, so I think I can say that its not 9/11 we are laughing at - its the silly theories.

sorry to hear that.
which floor would you have worked in?

31st

Everyone in the firm got out alive, but I didn't know that until the day after. I just assumed they all perished. For a day, I thought I'd cheated death.

I knew people further up who didn't make it out.

Someone called and left a voicemail as they were fleeing. He did make it out. It was chilling.

 

[georgephillip]

I'm almost convinced. A few more mindless obscenities should do it!

Yet you continue to ignore stating how long it would take for a professionally razed 110 story tower to fall. There's no obscenities for you to hide behind so I guess you have two choices:

Keep proving you are trolling

Or

Give the time on a razed 110 story tower

How would I know that? Do you know of such a building?

Not that it matters. The time is immaterial. The towers collapsed due to the fires weakening the structural steel. No other explanation is plausible given the facts in evidence.

Not to rational people, that is. People like you will believe any old stupid shit.

Speaking of stupid old shit...If "the towers collapsed due to the fires weakening of the structural steel," then 9/11/2001 is even more historic than even Dick Cheney imagined.

Since never before in recorded history has a single steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to fire, imagine Dick's delight when three skyscrapers fell to the flames on his watch.

Maybe stupid old shits like you and Dick could now tell us how the fires CUT the 47 steel columns running up the center of all towers?

I won't even ask you and Dick for an explanation for the "partly evaporated" steel members in the debris pile or multiple eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions.

Dick might have a heart attack...

 

[daveman]

ROFL!

Hilarious!

Yeah, that's right, it was over a pipeline.

Twoofer questioning: "Is energy in anyway connected to this random series of events?" Answer, "Yes. There is a $3 billion pipeline proposed by Chevron." Twoofer logic, "A-HA! That proves it! The Bush/Cheney/Republican/Fed/Bilderbergs are behind it and evil!"

Twoofers will believe anything.

Except physics, engineering, and thermodynamics.

but then they would have to actually admit they are wrong

In case of a disagreement between reality and a Troofer, reality is wrong.

 

[daveman]

Except physics, engineering, and thermodynamics.

I owe you rep for that!

Thanks!

 

[daveman]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

Then perhaps you should consider combating the enemy who actually committed the act of war instead of making up stupid shit about people who didn't.

 

[daveman]

Yet you continue to ignore stating how long it would take for a professionally razed 110 story tower to fall. There's no obscenities for you to hide behind so I guess you have two choices:

Keep proving you are trolling

Or

Give the time on a razed 110 story tower

How would I know that? Do you know of such a building?

Not that it matters. The time is immaterial. The towers collapsed due to the fires weakening the structural steel. No other explanation is plausible given the facts in evidence.

Not to rational people, that is. People like you will believe any old stupid shit.

Speaking of stupid old shit...If "the towers collapsed due to the fires weakening of the structural steel," then 9/11/2001 is even more historic than even Dick Cheney imagined.

Since never before in recorded history has a single steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to fire, imagine Dick's delight when three skyscrapers fell to the flames on his watch.

Maybe stupid old shits like you and Dick could now tell us how the fires CUT the 47 steel columns running up the center of all towers?

I won't even ask you and Dick for an explanation for the "partly evaporated" steel members in the debris pile or multiple eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions.

Dick might have a heart attack...

I'm under no obligation to defend your insanity.

 

[DiveCon]

Yet you continue to ignore stating how long it would take for a professionally razed 110 story tower to fall. There's no obscenities for you to hide behind so I guess you have two choices:

Keep proving you are trolling

Or

Give the time on a razed 110 story tower

How would I know that? Do you know of such a building?

Not that it matters. The time is immaterial. The towers collapsed due to the fires weakening the structural steel. No other explanation is plausible given the facts in evidence.

Not to rational people, that is. People like you will believe any old stupid shit.

Speaking of stupid old shit...If "the towers collapsed due to the fires weakening of the structural steel," then 9/11/2001 is even more historic than even Dick Cheney imagined.

Since never before in recorded history has a single steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to fire, imagine Dick's delight when three skyscrapers fell to the flames on his watch.

Maybe stupid old shits like you and Dick could now tell us how the fires CUT the 47 steel columns running up the center of all towers?

I won't even ask you and Dick for an explanation for the "partly evaporated" steel members in the debris pile or multiple eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions.

Dick might have a heart attack...

never????
really?
what about the troofers lie about the madrid building?
the one that had a concrete core as well as steel structure, and the steel only part totally collapsed
leaving only the part clad in concrete

 

[DiveCon]

How would I know that? Do you know of such a building?

Not that it matters. The time is immaterial. The towers collapsed due to the fires weakening the structural steel. No other explanation is plausible given the facts in evidence.

Not to rational people, that is. People like you will believe any old stupid shit.

Speaking of stupid old shit...If "the towers collapsed due to the fires weakening of the structural steel," then 9/11/2001 is even more historic than even Dick Cheney imagined.

Since never before in recorded history has a single steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to fire, imagine Dick's delight when three skyscrapers fell to the flames on his watch.

Maybe stupid old shits like you and Dick could now tell us how the fires CUT the 47 steel columns running up the center of all towers?

I won't even ask you and Dick for an explanation for the "partly evaporated" steel members in the debris pile or multiple eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions.

Dick might have a heart attack...

I'm under no obligation to defend your insanity.

not to mention that most of what he said was a LIE

 

[daveman]

Speaking of stupid old shit...If "the towers collapsed due to the fires weakening of the structural steel," then 9/11/2001 is even more historic than even Dick Cheney imagined.

Since never before in recorded history has a single steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to fire, imagine Dick's delight when three skyscrapers fell to the flames on his watch.

Maybe stupid old shits like you and Dick could now tell us how the fires CUT the 47 steel columns running up the center of all towers?

I won't even ask you and Dick for an explanation for the "partly evaporated" steel members in the debris pile or multiple eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions.

Dick might have a heart attack...

I'm under no obligation to defend your insanity.

not to mention that most of what he said was a LIE

But he beleeeeeeeves it...so that means it's true.

 

[georgephillip]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

Well, I had friends die in the WTC and I nearly went to work for a firm there nine months prior to 9/11, so I think I can say that its not 9/11 we are laughing at - its the silly theories.

"Silly theories" like the one provided by Bush/Cheney's commerce department (NIST) when it admits that their report "does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached."
(NIST, 2005, p.80, fn. 12)

Some find that "silly" since much of the external evidence for explosive demolition typically comes after collapse initiation.

 

[elvis]

It's only funny until the bombs start killing your family.

Well, I had friends die in the WTC and I nearly went to work for a firm there nine months prior to 9/11, so I think I can say that its not 9/11 we are laughing at - its the silly theories.

"Silly theories" like the one provided by Bush/Cheney's commerce department (NIST) when it admits that their report "does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached."
(NIST, 2005, p.80, fn. 12)

Some find that "silly" since much of the external evidence for explosive demolition typically comes after collapse initiation.

Hint: David Ray Griffin has not provided evidence that comes anywhere close to challenging the official story.

 

[georgephillip]

How would I know that? Do you know of such a building?

Not that it matters. The time is immaterial. The towers collapsed due to the fires weakening the structural steel. No other explanation is plausible given the facts in evidence.

Not to rational people, that is. People like you will believe any old stupid shit.

Speaking of stupid old shit...If "the towers collapsed due to the fires weakening of the structural steel," then 9/11/2001 is even more historic than even Dick Cheney imagined.

Since never before in recorded history has a single steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to fire, imagine Dick's delight when three skyscrapers fell to the flames on his watch.

Maybe stupid old shits like you and Dick could now tell us how the fires CUT the 47 steel columns running up the center of all towers?

I won't even ask you and Dick for an explanation for the "partly evaporated" steel members in the debris pile or multiple eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions.

Dick might have a heart attack...

never????
really?
what about the troofers lie about the madrid building?
the one that had a concrete core as well as steel structure, and the steel only part totally collapsed
leaving only the part clad in concrete

You mean this one?

 

[DiveCon]

Speaking of stupid old shit...If "the towers collapsed due to the fires weakening of the structural steel," then 9/11/2001 is even more historic than even Dick Cheney imagined.

Since never before in recorded history has a single steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to fire, imagine Dick's delight when three skyscrapers fell to the flames on his watch.

Maybe stupid old shits like you and Dick could now tell us how the fires CUT the 47 steel columns running up the center of all towers?

I won't even ask you and Dick for an explanation for the "partly evaporated" steel members in the debris pile or multiple eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions.

Dick might have a heart attack...

never????
really?
what about the troofers lie about the madrid building?
the one that had a concrete core as well as steel structure, and the steel only part totally collapsed
leaving only the part clad in concrete

You mean this one?

yup, thats the one you guys lie about

 

[georgephillip]

Well, I had friends die in the WTC and I nearly went to work for a firm there nine months prior to 9/11, so I think I can say that its not 9/11 we are laughing at - its the silly theories.

"Silly theories" like the one provided by Bush/Cheney's commerce department (NIST) when it admits that their report "does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached."
(NIST, 2005, p.80, fn. 12)

Some find that "silly" since much of the external evidence for explosive demolition typically comes after collapse initiation.

Hint: David Ray Griffin has not provided evidence that comes anywhere close to challenging the official story.

Got proof?