Twitter refused to remove child porn

Thinker101

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
18,937
Reaction score
6,379
Points
360
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
 

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
35,209
Reaction score
20,133
Points
1,915
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.
Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.
Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit

Lefties are OK with baby murder, Hunter, child porn, and sex trafficking. To them, Donald was a special kind of obscenity they truly hate: RAW NAKED HONESTY.
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,728
Reaction score
5,981
Points
1,140
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!
 
OP
Thinker101

Thinker101

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
18,937
Reaction score
6,379
Points
360
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!
Be stupid on your own time.

Child pornography laws in the United States specify that child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to 20 years' imprisonment or fine of $5000.

Child pornography laws in the United States - Wikipedia
 

Slade3200

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,728
Reaction score
5,981
Points
1,140
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!
Be stupid on your own time.

Child pornography laws in the United States specify that child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to 20 years' imprisonment or fine of $5000.

Child pornography laws in the United States - Wikipedia
Well then the law can go after Twitter. Why are you bitching about them having their own standards?!
 
OP
Thinker101

Thinker101

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
18,937
Reaction score
6,379
Points
360
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!
Be stupid on your own time.

Child pornography laws in the United States specify that child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to 20 years' imprisonment or fine of $5000.

Child pornography laws in the United States - Wikipedia
Well then the law can go after Twitter. Why are you bitching about them having their own standards?!
Sigh...great, they can explain their ignorance in court.
 

tyroneweaver

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
20,914
Reaction score
5,328
Points
280
Location
Burley, Idaho
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
It's one of those things joey reid thinks we're jealous of
 

jackflash

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
1,330
Reaction score
1,040
Points
1,908
Location
USA
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
The tech giants follow an old rule: "We own the corporation, we sign the payroll checks. So we make the rules & enforce the laws. If one does not abide by our rules/decisions then one is terminated from our service, PERIOD!!!"

I would suggest to do what I did quite some time ago & that is to terminate any social media accounts one has @ current with the big tech spoiled rotten brats. Accounts like Facebook & Twitter are more useless than a submarine in a drag race. If enough folks drop those social media accounts someone else will fill the bill with a low to non existent moderated social media platform. We survived just fine without Facelessbook & Schitter forever & we can survive quite nicely without them today as well.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
118,998
Reaction score
33,372
Points
2,220
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
Progressives love child porn, its their morning cornflakes
 
OP
Thinker101

Thinker101

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
18,937
Reaction score
6,379
Points
360
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies”.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit
The tech giants follow an old rule: "We own the corporation, we sign the payroll checks. So we make the rules & enforce the laws. If one does not abide by our rules/decisions then one is terminated from our service, PERIOD!!!"

I would suggest to do what I did quite some time ago & that is to terminate any social media accounts one has @ current with the big tech spoiled rotten brats. Accounts like Facebook & Twitter are more useless than a submarine in a drag race. If enough folks drop those social media accounts someone else will fill the bill with a low to non existent moderated social media platform. We survived just fine without Facelessbook & Schitter forever & we can survive quite nicely without them today as well.
Yep, they're long gone.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top