Twitter refused to remove child porn

Thinker101

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2017
24,112
13,897
1,415
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.
Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.
Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit


Lefties are OK with baby murder, Hunter, child porn, and sex trafficking. To them, Donald was a special kind of obscenity they truly hate: RAW NAKED HONESTY.
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!

Be stupid on your own time.

Child pornography laws in the United States specify that child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to 20 years' imprisonment or fine of $5000.

Child pornography laws in the United States - Wikipedia
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!

Be stupid on your own time.

Child pornography laws in the United States specify that child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to 20 years' imprisonment or fine of $5000.

Child pornography laws in the United States - Wikipedia
Well then the law can go after Twitter. Why are you bitching about them having their own standards?!
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
Of course they have their own standards. Everybody has their own standards. What kind of crap argument is that?!

Be stupid on your own time.

Child pornography laws in the United States specify that child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to 20 years' imprisonment or fine of $5000.

Child pornography laws in the United States - Wikipedia
Well then the law can go after Twitter. Why are you bitching about them having their own standards?!

Sigh...great, they can explain their ignorance in court.
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
It's one of those things joey reid thinks we're jealous of
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
The tech giants follow an old rule: "We own the corporation, we sign the payroll checks. So we make the rules & enforce the laws. If one does not abide by our rules/decisions then one is terminated from our service, PERIOD!!!"

I would suggest to do what I did quite some time ago & that is to terminate any social media accounts one has @ current with the big tech spoiled rotten brats. Accounts like Facebook & Twitter are more useless than a submarine in a drag race. If enough folks drop those social media accounts someone else will fill the bill with a low to non existent moderated social media platform. We survived just fine without Facelessbook & Schitter forever & we can survive quite nicely without them today as well.
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
Progressives love child porn, its their morning cornflakes
 
The arbiters of truth seem to have their own standards. Negative tweets about Hunter Biden are not allowed, but evidently there's no problem with child porn.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation ā€œdidnā€™t find a violationā€ of the companyā€™s ā€œpoliciesā€.

Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didnā€™t ā€˜violate policiesā€™: lawsuit
The tech giants follow an old rule: "We own the corporation, we sign the payroll checks. So we make the rules & enforce the laws. If one does not abide by our rules/decisions then one is terminated from our service, PERIOD!!!"

I would suggest to do what I did quite some time ago & that is to terminate any social media accounts one has @ current with the big tech spoiled rotten brats. Accounts like Facebook & Twitter are more useless than a submarine in a drag race. If enough folks drop those social media accounts someone else will fill the bill with a low to non existent moderated social media platform. We survived just fine without Facelessbook & Schitter forever & we can survive quite nicely without them today as well.

Yep, they're long gone.
 
Twitter also loves conspiracies if it involves forcibly harvesting children for blood.

1624031774267.jpeg
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top