Twitter Files #5 dropping right now.

[Darkwind]

Musk has already revealed all the damaging evidence of election interference. Our corrupt government is now fully exposed.

Yet, a largish majority of America knows nothing about it as the legacy media begins the coverup for the Democrats by not reporting any of it in the main stream.

 

[toobfreak]

They are private. They could ban him for his bad hair.

But they AREN'T banning him for his hair, Zinc, they banned the president for his political position at the behest of the US government in order to try to influence future elections!

And people and companies who DO ban people denying them services on just a whim or impulse are FASCISTS, but when they do it clandestinely in cooperation with a secret government effort trying to skew public opinion and steer future elections, they become CRIMINALS and a Marxist regime out to defraud the voters padding their own power structure by usurping democracy.

 

[Darkwind]

They are private. They could ban him for his bad hair. Is this is Twitter Files #5 its a nonevent.

As has already been shown in previous drops, the government was putting their thumb on the scales of what content was being allowed and which content was being withheld.

This taints the entire process and leads to the exact question of the 230 exceptions that social media is permitted to have.

We see bad actors in government, violating rights, and a company complicit with election engineering that has altered the outcome of at least one election.

It calls for a DOJ investigation by an Independent Council because the current DOJ regime cannot be trusted.

 

[Zincwarrior]

But they AREN'T banning him for his hair, Zinc, they banned the president for his political position

Yes there had just been an attempted coup. They are private. The big reveal appears to be that there was discussion and disagreement over whether to ban Trump. This is a big reveal to...who?

 

[Zincwarrior]

As has already been shown in previous drops, the government was putting their thumb on the scales of what content was being allowed and which content was being withheld.

This taints the entire process and leads to the exact question of the 230 exceptions that social media is permitted to have.

We see bad actors in government, violating rights, and a company complicit with election engineering that has altered the outcome of at least one election.

It calls for a DOJ investigation by an Independent Council because the current DOJ regime cannot be trusted.

Cool. Ban Twitter. The collective IQ of the US rises at least a point.

 

[Darkwind]

Cool. Ban Twitter. The collective IQ of the US rises at least a point.

No one wants Twitter banned, except a few disgruntled people. I'm confident you already know that and are now deflecting because you have nothing more to add to the conversation.

 

[toobfreak]

Yes there had just been an attempted coup. They are private. The big reveal appears to be that there was discussion and disagreement over whether to ban Trump. This is a big reveal to...who?

What are you talking about? That doesn't even make sense or form any congruent thought and just dances around and evades the point I've made three times now.

 

[Darkwind]

c

What are you talking about? That doesn't even make sense or form any congruent thought and just dances around and evades the point I've made three times now.

He is just taking his queue from some of the legacy media trying to downplay this serious breach of not only ethics but a possible violation of law by corrupt government officials who have a severe bias against a significant portion of the population.

As I noted, the legacy media is covering up most of this by not reporting it.

 

[marvin martian]

c

He is just taking his queue from some of the legacy media trying to downplay this serious breach of not only ethics but a possible violation of law by corrupt government officials who have a severe bias against a significant portion of the population.

As I noted, the legacy media is covering up most of this by not reporting it.

 

[toobfreak]

Cool. Ban Twitter. The collective IQ of the US rises at least a point.

Really? Why is that? Why is Twitter suddenly an issue with you just because it has changed ownership to someone wanting it to run efficiently and benignly like it used to during the first 14 years of its 16 year lifespan again?

 

[Zincwarrior]

No one wants Twitter banned, except a few disgruntled people. I'm confident you already know that and are now deflecting because you have nothing more to add to the conversation.

I don't care about Twitter. Its just a ranty website, and your big discovery is that there was disagreement over whether Trump should be banned. I welcome the forty three congressional committees that the Republicans wil have next year about it, and am sure the American people and fill them with great resolve.

 

[Fueri]

c

He is just taking his queue from some of the legacy media trying to downplay this serious breach of not only ethics but a possible violation of law by corrupt government officials who have a severe bias against a significant portion of the population.

As I noted, the legacy media is covering up most of this by not reporting it.

Yep, the narrative is that it is a nothingburger. They cannot discuss what happened so this avenue allows them not to.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Really? Why is that? Why is Twitter suddenly an issue with you just because it has changed ownership to someone wanting it to run efficiently and benignly like it used to during the first 14 years of its 16 year lifespan again?

It's not. You posted the thread. I tried Twitter for about a week and quit. It was like drunks shouting at each at a bar.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Yep, the narrative is that it is a nothingburger. They cannot discuss what happened so this avenue allows them not to.

Your problem is what happened is only relevant to you. But please run a dozen committees on it and see how that goes for you.

 

[Fueri]

Your problem is what happened is only relevant to you. But please run a dozen committees on it and see how that goes for you.

No, it is not, despite your litany of nonensical posts claiming otherwise.

 

[Darkwind]

I don't care about Twitter. Its just a ranty website, and your big discovery is that there was disagreement over whether Trump should be banned. I welcome the forty three congressional committees that the Republicans wil have next year about it, and am sure the American people and fill them with great resolve.

No, that is NOT the big discovery. That is YOU trying to downplay a major political party, along with a government, violating first Amendment rights to control the outcome of an election.

/thread

 

[Zincwarrior]

No, it is not, despite your litany of nonensical posts claiming otherwise.

Its not relevant to you? OK.

No, that is NOT the big discovery. That is YOU trying to downplay a major political party, along with a government, violating first Amendment rights to control the outcome of an election.

Fair enough. Help me out then. AS I don't go on Twitter, In one sentence each, what is the big reveal of File #3, #4, and #5. Then tell us what you want to occur because of it.

 

[toobfreak]

legacy media trying to downplay this serious breach of not only ethics but a possible violation of law by corrupt government officials

I think it is a HUGE ethics issue and undoubtedly a YUGE criminal matter! Perhaps THE BIGGEST STORY AND SCANDAL TO EVER ROCK THE UNITED STATES. This is what 3rd world countries do whose people can only get state run TV! Except here, democrats are trying to pretend that this is all still just normal free market business as usual.

What is the difference between China, N. Korea, Iran or Russia and the USA now if all our media lets us read and know is what the STATE wants us to?

Want to know how big a crime and ethics issue it really is, DW? Just let the right start taking over social media platforms, television networks and other media and start banning democrats for their support of Biden letting them read only hard right leaning media and news and we will find out real fast when the left uprises and revolts with mobs in every city rioting the imposed fascism!

Democrats don't mind fascism, socialism, Marxism and totalitarianism, so long as it comports with THEIR views! The government can stand on the necks of millions oppressing them like Nazis just so long as it is a group they didn't like, want or agree with anyway.

JUST DON'T DO IT TO THEM.

 

[miketx]

So you're saying there was conflict over continuing to permit Trump to post on Twitter, that it got heated and then Twitter management decided to go ahead and suspend his account?

You need one of those enema toilets and soon!

 

[toobfreak]

your big discovery is that there was disagreement over whether Trump should be banned.

No, the big discovery is that criminals in the federal government have been secretly working for years with Big Tech in order to suppress and steer discussion and discovery of the facts in the 2020 election, steer public opinion about J6 and Biden, Trump was just the beginning, in order to effect a predetermined outcome of THEIR CHOOSING for THEIR BENEFIT in that and future elections all done clandestinely while pretending that we are still in a free market constitutional republic run by the will of the people consenting to be governed representatively while there is no longer any representation AT ALL.

Just taxation.

DAMN MAN! Are you that dense that you can't even recognize when to stand up for your own liberty thus being undeserving of it and should be shipped out to some 3rd country, or that compromised and complicit that you stand here faking ignorance?