Money was given. If all you have is a question, then you don’t have anything. “Looks like” isn’t evidence. You have none. The allegation is baseless.
Honestly, you’re just being a pain.
You’re still ignoring the context. I can’t make you understand.
If it’s baseless why do you keep addressing it. The money was given. Only question is why.
Why? Because I am outsmarting you yet again? Sorry about that.
Your lashing out is delicious. Yum yum yum. Who is the victim? Lol
Hahahhahahahahahaha what was the appraised value? Why was she kept of the black list? Other oligarchs weren’t. Coincidence? Herr Lesh?
What you’re doing is making yourself look like a dishonest asshole
Herr Lesh. Mistakes happen. Mistakes aren’t lies. Rest was factual only mistake was the overseeing body. You’re beating a dead horse.
And why was she kept off the black list. He was partners with Hunter and Joe got 50% to keep her off the naughty list is the charge. Kept up, Herr Lesh.
Wrong. The only question is whether Joe Biden delivered any policy in exchange for the money.
Yep. As I said. Why?….and therein lies the rub.
Considering you’re made absolutely no effort to find out why before launching into a baseless accusation of corruption, I doubt your sincerity in wanting to find the truth.
Ha ha ha
Because you make baseless accusations and attack people who don’t believe them?
Oh they have a base. But who is the victim?
They don’t. When I ask you what they’re based on, you say that’s what the inquiry is for.
She paid the money and was kept off the naughty list. Already explained.
Who is the victim?
How?
How?
What bank frauD?
Link?
