Tulsi Gabbard's Venezuela tweet goes viral. Most agree with my girl!

The world supposedly wanted the Taliban out also. Who runs Venezuela has to be left to the Venezuelan people.
I completely agree. Who is that now that 8 million people left the country in fear for their lives? Seriously, Maduro was locking them up. I know you know that.

This is complicated because of that fact. Trump is going to get the acting VP to do what he wants for awhile to organize the next phase. Let's see if Venezuelans go back home. That needs to happen I think.
 
I completely agree. Who is that now that 8 million people left the country in fear for their lives? Seriously, Maduro was locking them up. I know you know that.

And now we are locking them up.


This is complicated because of that fact. Trump is going to get the acting VP to do what he wants for awhile to organize the next phase. Let's see if Venezuelans go back home. That needs to happen I think.

She is already telling him to bugger off. Are we going to arrest her also?
 
Power is an addictive thing. Those with weak wills crumble to it. That’s who Trump preys on
yet democrats wanted Maduro out, you probably don't know that since you're out in the wilderness of canada.
 
And now we are locking them up.
no, we are locking up someone who invaded/ stole a country and took over and democrats wanted it as bad as republicans. You're losing ground my friend.
 
And now we are locking them up.




She is already telling him to bugger off. Are we going to arrest her also?
no, she is working with him. You can't be that lost.
 
no, we are locking up someone who invaded/ stole a country and took over and democrats wanted it as bad as republicans. You're losing ground my friend.

We are locking up those who fled Maduro.

Just like Iraq. We condemned Saddam for killing his own people are then we ended up killing the same people.
 
Panama, Grenada, Germany, Italy, Japan.
Let’s look at Panama: AI analysis:

The displacement and negative effects of the 1989 U.S. invasion were both immediate and long-lasting, with some social impacts still present in 2026.

Duration of Displacement
  • Immediate Crisis: Approximately 20,000 people were displaced during the initial weeks of the invasion, particularly from the El Chorrillo neighborhood, which was almost entirely destroyed.
  • Initial Recovery: Order was restored within approximately two weeks of the invasion. By February 1990, many major military operations had ceased, and some reconstruction assistance had begun.
  • Long-Term Homelessness: Despite U.S. grants of $6,500 per family for rebuilding, thousands remained in temporary shelters for years. By 1992, reports indicated that poverty and homelessness remained significant issues in the wake of the destruction.

Long-Term Negative Effects
  • Economic Ruin: Panama’s economy had already been devastated by a U.S. embargo prior to the invasion and took several years to recover. Significant economic growth did not return until the early 1990s.
  • Crime and Drug Trafficking: The dissolution of the Panamanian Defense Forces (PDF) led to a massive crime wave in the weeks following the invasion. Over the subsequent decades, critics argued that removing Noriega failed to stop the flow of illicit narcotics, which remained a persistent problem into 2026.
  • Unresolved Legal and Human Rights Issues: For over 30 years, families have sought answers regarding the "disappeared" and the true death toll, which remains a subject of dispute between official U.S. figures (~500) and human rights groups (up to 3,000).
  • Sovereignty and Institutions: The invasion significantly weakened Panamanian institutions and intelligence capabilities. Some analysts note that its legacy of institutional corruption and weakened security infrastructure is still felt in 2026.
  • Unpaid Reparations: In 2018, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights ruled that the U.S. was responsible for deaths and injuries and should provide compensation; however, the U.S. has generally not fulfilled these non-binding monetary claims.
 
Let’s look at Panama: AI analysis:

The displacement and negative effects of the 1989 U.S. invasion were both immediate and long-lasting, with some social impacts still present in 2026.

Duration of Displacement
  • Immediate Crisis: Approximately 20,000 people were displaced during the initial weeks of the invasion, particularly from the El Chorrillo neighborhood, which was almost entirely destroyed.
  • Initial Recovery: Order was restored within approximately two weeks of the invasion. By February 1990, many major military operations had ceased, and some reconstruction assistance had begun.
  • Long-Term Homelessness: Despite U.S. grants of $6,500 per family for rebuilding, thousands remained in temporary shelters for years. By 1992, reports indicated that poverty and homelessness remained significant issues in the wake of the destruction.

Long-Term Negative Effects
  • Economic Ruin: Panama’s economy had already been devastated by a U.S. embargo prior to the invasion and took several years to recover. Significant economic growth did not return until the early 1990s.
  • Crime and Drug Trafficking: The dissolution of the Panamanian Defense Forces (PDF) led to a massive crime wave in the weeks following the invasion. Over the subsequent decades, critics argued that removing Noriega failed to stop the flow of illicit narcotics, which remained a persistent problem into 2026.
  • Unresolved Legal and Human Rights Issues: For over 30 years, families have sought answers regarding the "disappeared" and the true death toll, which remains a subject of dispute between official U.S. figures (~500) and human rights groups (up to 3,000).
  • Sovereignty and Institutions: The invasion significantly weakened Panamanian institutions and intelligence capabilities. Some analysts note that its legacy of institutional corruption and weakened security infrastructure is still felt in 2026.
  • Unpaid Reparations: In 2018, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights ruled that the U.S. was responsible for deaths and injuries and should provide compensation; however, the U.S. has generally not fulfilled these non-binding monetary claims.

Of course you run to AI. **** that.

The Canal is safe, and we have a friendly government still in power there.
 
We are locking up those who fled Maduro.

Just like Iraq. We condemned Saddam for killing his own people are then we ended up killing the same people.
we are not locking up venezuelans. where is that at? If you are referring to the evil that Maduro sent here on his own, then yes, we are sending them away. Those who came here to escape that asshole madman, then no.
 

Rubio, when asked on CBS News Face the Nation on Sunday whether the US could work with Maduro's number two, said: "We're going to make an assessment on the basis of what they do, not what they say publicly in the interim."

He added that "if they don't make the right decisions, the United States will retain multiple levers of leverage to ensure that our interests are protected".

Trump said on Saturday that Venezuela's opposition leader MarĂ­a Corina Machado had neither the support nor the respect within Venezuela to become its leader.

Machado had earlier called for Edmundo González to assume power. She had rallied support for González in the 2024 presidential election and vote tallies released by her party suggest he won by a landslide.
 
15th post
BTW, if we had any intelligent journalists in this country, the first question would be is Venezuela better off with or without Maduro?
 
we are not locking up venezuelans. where is that at? If you are referring to the evil that Maduro sent here on his own, then yes, we are sending them away. Those who came here to escape that asshole madman, then no.

"No we arent, well, yes we are".
 

Rubio, when asked on CBS News Face the Nation on Sunday whether the US could work with Maduro's number two, said: "We're going to make an assessment on the basis of what they do, not what they say publicly in the interim."

He added that "if they don't make the right decisions, the United States will retain multiple levers of leverage to ensure that our interests are protected".

Trump said on Saturday that Venezuela's opposition leader MarĂ­a Corina Machado had neither the support nor the respect within Venezuela to become its leader.

Machado had earlier called for Edmundo González to assume power. She had rallied support for González in the 2024 presidential election and vote tallies released by her party suggest he won by a landslide.

Better build a new prison for all those you are going to have to arrest.
 
Of course you run to AI. **** that.

The Canal is safe, and we have a friendly government still in power there.
Why **** that? It’s an unpartisan source that scans a wide variety of websites to draw its conclusions. All sources are cited. Instead of saying “**** that” why don’t you provide an actual counter argument or point out anything you think not to be true.
 
Back
Top Bottom