According to John Bolton a few days ago:
‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"
Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.
and one more
With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?
‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"
Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.
and one more
There Are Many Reasons to Oppose Tulsi Gabbard’s Trump Job. This Is a Pretty Big One.
Tulsi Gabbard’s pro-Russia political bent has been the cause of much alarm in the intelligence community ever since President-elect Donald Trump chose her to be his director of national intelligence. Because, sure, she lacks any relevant experience whatsoever for the job, a gargantuan responsibility that requires oversight of 18 intelligence agencies. But she also takes positions that make her seem, well, compromised by foreign governments.
For example, she has a tendency to espouse foreign-policy talking points that very much align with Kremlin propaganda, often with the help of her pal Tucker Carlson. She has blamed the U.S. for supposedly provoking Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and posited that the Biden administration is developing “biolabs” in the invaded territory. She is weirdly into Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, having once held a private meeting with the strongman and refusing to ever admit that he did, in fact, repeatedly attack and kill his own people with assistance from the Russians. (Rossiya-1, a Russian state television channel, recently called her a “comrade.”) She even spreads conspiracy theories about herself, claiming earlier this year that she’d been placed on a Transportation Security Administration “terror watchlist” for criticizing Kamala Harris.
With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?
Last edited: