CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Banned
- #381
you calling the governments view a "theory" doesnt even fit the definition of theory.
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
sorry, but the official government conclusions are not "theory". it is backed up by actual facts. on the other hand, your explosives "theory" is exactly that. only a theory because it has no facts to back it up.
Again with the fucking strawmen. Where have I offered an "explosives theory?" C'mon, tell us where and what post? You can't because that is not a claim I've made. So when shown why you didn't even comprehend the simple def of "conspiracy" your rebuttle is to criticize me for something I have not said. Good job!
As for your "theory" red herring, do you understand the OCT has never been proven accurate?
I see you are still ignoring the testimonies that were kept secret while the Commission did its "full" investigation. Know what pisses me off about people like you the most? You pretend to care.