Truth Revealed by...The Daily Show????

[Truthmatters]

This is the level of your debate?

claims of "upsetting" the person your debating with?

You just refuse to get it dont you.


That was an election not a tea party event.

Now how well do the people like that change that was made in the elction?

The congress is at record low approval under the guidance of the tea party faction.


That is why the OWS grew out of thin air without a news station to promote it and without a Pair of wealthy brothers with insane ideas of being the new kings of America.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is the level of your debate?

claims of "upsetting" the person your debating with?

You just refuse to get it dont you.


That was an election not a tea party event.

Now how well do the people like that change that was made in the elction?

The congress is at record low approval under the guidance of the tea party faction.


That is why the OWS grew out of thin air without a news station to promote it and without a Pair of wealthy brothers with insane ideas of being the new kings of America.

"Now how well do the people like that change that was made in the elction?"
How well do folks like the commie in the White House?


OK...I admit I said that to upset you.
(Did it?)


"That is why the OWS grew out of thin air..."
Of course it didn't, silly:
SIEU, ACORN, Working Families Party, Fenton Communications, Tides Foundation, Soros, AdBusters, Ruckus Society...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jOxERtkwN4&feature=player_embedded]Occupy Wall Street Was Organized From Day One by SEIU / ACORN Front - The Working Family Party - YouTube[/ame]


It was manufactured to scoop up rabble and convince folks like you to be camp followers.



More here: http://www.usmessageboard.com/tea-party/188708-tea-party-was-astroturf.html

 

[Truthmatters]

where is you proof of any of that silly right wing talking points?

 

[Truthmatters]

This is the level of your debate?

claims of "upsetting" the person your debating with?

You just refuse to get it dont you.


That was an election not a tea party event.

Now how well do the people like that change that was made in the elction?

The congress is at record low approval under the guidance of the tea party faction.


That is why the OWS grew out of thin air without a news station to promote it and without a Pair of wealthy brothers with insane ideas of being the new kings of America.

"Now how well do the people like that change that was made in the elction?"
How well do folks like the commie in the White House?


OK...I admit I said that to upset you.
(Did it?)


"That is why the OWS grew out of thin air..."
Of course it didn't, silly:
SIEU, ACORN, Working Families Party, Fenton Communications, Tides Foundation, Soros, AdBusters, Ruckus Society...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jOxERtkwN4&feature=player_embedded]Occupy Wall Street Was Organized From Day One by SEIU / ACORN Front - The Working Family Party - YouTube[/ame]


It was manufactured to scoop up rabble and convince folks like you to be camp followers.



More here: http://www.usmessageboard.com/tea-party/188708-tea-party-was-astroturf.html

hahahahahahahahahah


See there you go, one young woman and you try to LABEL the whole group because she worked with community organizing.


Now Koch Brothers money can be traced DIRECTLY to the tea party coffers right from the start.


Dream on my little fake superhero.

You will not be able to successfully ROVE this movement.

 

[Intense]

Lot of spin, there, blackie.

Eh? How so?

Private property is mine, what I own.
Personal property, a term of art, is mine, what I own.

Consider this ...

You seem to be missing my point. Socialists usually make some kind of distinction between the private property, which they want to abolish or put the state in charge of, and personal property - things that people will still be allowed to 'own' individually. I'm not advocating their views, just trying to understand where they're coming from. For most of the socialists I've talked to, it seems a matter of convenience - ie personal property is the stuff they don't want to share, private property is everything else.

You seem to be missing my point. Socialists usually make some kind of distinction between the private property, which they want to abolish or put the state in charge of, and personal property - things that people will still be allowed to 'own' individually. I'm not advocating their views, just trying to understand where they're coming from. For most of the socialists I've talked to, it seems a matter of convenience - ie personal property is the stuff they don't want to share, private property is everything else.

Utter Bullshit. You want a coke and fries with that?

Thank You so much kind Sir for allowing me to keep some of my toys.

 

[Intense]

This is the level of your debate?

claims of "upsetting" the person your debating with?

You just refuse to get it dont you.


That was an election not a tea party event.

Now how well do the people like that change that was made in the elction?

The congress is at record low approval under the guidance of the tea party faction.


That is why the OWS grew out of thin air without a news station to promote it and without a Pair of wealthy brothers with insane ideas of being the new kings of America.

I think you are Partially right. We do need more Tea Party Events. Thanks for the tip TM.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Lot of spin, there, blackie.

Eh? How so?

Private property is mine, what I own.
Personal property, a term of art, is mine, what I own.

Consider this ...

You seem to be missing my point. Socialists usually make some kind of distinction between the private property, which they want to abolish or put the state in charge of, and personal property - things that people will still be allowed to 'own' individually. I'm not advocating their views, just trying to understand where they're coming from. For most of the socialists I've talked to, it seems a matter of convenience - ie personal property is the stuff they don't want to share, private property is everything else.

You seem to be missing my point. Socialists usually make some kind of distinction between the private property, which they want to abolish or put the state in charge of, and personal property - things that people will still be allowed to 'own' individually. I'm not advocating their views, just trying to understand where they're coming from. For most of the socialists I've talked to, it seems a matter of convenience - ie personal property is the stuff they don't want to share, private property is everything else.

Utter Bullshit. You want a coke and fries with that?

Thank You so much kind Sir for allowing me to keep some of my toys.

I'm afraid that our friend blackie may get a splinter from sitting on the fence.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Lot of spin, there, blackie.

Eh? How so?

Private property is mine, what I own.
Personal property, a term of art, is mine, what I own.

Consider this ...

You seem to be missing my point. Socialists usually make some kind of distinction between the private property, which they want to abolish or put the state in charge of, and personal property - things that people will still be allowed to 'own' individually. I'm not advocating their views, just trying to understand where they're coming from. For most of the socialists I've talked to, it seems a matter of convenience - ie personal property is the stuff they don't want to share, private property is everything else.

You seem to be missing my point. Socialists usually make some kind of distinction between the private property, which they want to abolish or put the state in charge of, and personal property - things that people will still be allowed to 'own' individually. I'm not advocating their views, just trying to understand where they're coming from. For most of the socialists I've talked to, it seems a matter of convenience - ie personal property is the stuff they don't want to share, private property is everything else.

Utter Bullshit. You want a coke and fries with that?

Thank You so much kind Sir for allowing me to keep some of my toys.

Tell me if this is the direction in which you were going: being a 'socialist' is not like a tattoo...merely an identification which serves a point at a given moment.

Being a Leftist, the milieu may make a socialist into 'progressive' if the political landscape requires it, and, then again, into a communist, if the landscape allows.

Thus the explanation for blackie's idea that his socialist friends find it convenient to posit a difference between private property, and personal property...

It other words, they'll let you keep your toys....until they become powerful enough to take those Legos away!

 

[Intense]

Like ... What distinguishes the differences more between Soft Tyranny and Hard Tyranny?

Time or Ability?

Surely not the Happy Ending? Where they are Indistinguishable.