Trump's Words

Such WHAT? Once again, you yokels make undefined accusations against unspecified arguments, and always, without proof.
Do you think you are fooling anyone? Or are you just THAT STUPID?
It is like you do these things making vague, nebular attacks because you know they cannot be countered, proven wrong, or argued against because they are UNDEFINED.
Then you count that as a victory.
Will you be counting your victories in 10 days?

And this "Trump cult?" Really bugs ya, huh? At its most base, it is a success neither Harris nor Biden nor Obumma nor Hillary can ever come close to duplicating, and that kills you. Worse, it signals that Trump is really connecting with the voters.

BUT MORE TO THE POINT: the REAL reason for calling Trump voters a "cult" is actually just another ploy to try to DELEGITIMIZE THEM--- so don't LISTEN to them. You cannot delegitimize the message, you cannot delegitimize the policies, so you try to delegitimize the VOTERS supporting him.
“Trump is just joking.”

“That’s not what Trump meant.”

“You just don’t get Trump”


The blind partisan right is as dishonest as willfully ignorant.
 
I have a question for those who are voting for/voted for Trump:

When you see Trump have words of praise for dictators and autocrats like Putin, Xi, Kim and Orban, when he wishes his generals were like those of Hitler, and when you hear the words he uses to describe people -- human beings -- on American soil like "vermin", "garbage", and "animals", can you understand why people across the political spectrum might have concerns from a historical perspective?

It's a fair, clear, pertinent, and direct question. I'm expecting more personal attacks than straight, honest answers, and that would be an answer in itself. So that's okay.

Trump calls political enemies ‘vermin,’ echoing dictators Hitler, Mussolini​

I don’t think someone calling people he doesn’t like vermin, makes him Hitler

That’s a dembot desperate play.
 
They don't like acknowledging the rhetorical parallels between trump and historical fascists.
They pretend not to know about his usage of these words, or their historical context. In fairness, they may not. Maybe history isn't their strong suit, and they're sure as hell not told about any of this in their world.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I know that you keep hearing this
You are simply not very intelligent.
Trump committed treasonous, historic crimes: attempting to overturn a presidential election, disenfranchise millions of Americans, and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.

For more than two hours Trump did nothing to stop the violent, lawless attack of the Capitol Building – an attack he himself incited.

There’s Trump’s disgraceful, reprehensible attempt to exploit fallen American soldiers for crass political theater.

We have Trump announcing his intent to subject his political opponents to criminal prosecution for the ‘crime’ of being his political opponents – which is fundamentally fascist.

For these and scores of other reasons, Trump is unfit to be president – beyond partisan politics, policy positions, and the issues; there is no way to rationalize or justify voting for Trump.

It’s utter madness to want Trump in the WH – completely insane.
 
“Trump is just joking.”
“That’s not what Trump meant.”
“You just don’t get Trump”

The blind partisan right is as dishonest as willfully ignorant.

ONCE AGAIN, you make vague, undefined arguments with no supporting proof.
I have no idea the context of where these remarks were taken from.
And you never post the video showing us just what Trump said.
So your arguments of blindness, dishonesty and willful ignorance carry NO WEIGHT.

But the truth is that Trump does not operate like most politicians speaking VERBATIM, yet you try to take him that way, like when a person saying he is going to kill you in a game of chess! Then you claim he made a threat on his life!

Trump comes from the world of business as a CEO and tends to talk in METAPHOR, so while he comes across clear and direct in the context of his speech to the viewer familiar with his patter, what he says does not translate so well to written text on paper.

That is probably why most people respond telling you he was joking or not what he meant, yet you perennially refuse to understand that, probably because it defuses your agenda to discredit him and make him out a villain.

You trolls are WAY in over your heads trying to out-think me. I am the M-5 multitronic computer and you are a Radio Shack hand calculator.
I really have to pull my punches just to keep from destroying you.
 
when he wishes his generals were like those of Hitler
I have no idea why folks unquestioningly bleev crap like this
The claim comes from a misleading headline:

Trump: ‘I Need the Kind of Generals That Hitler Had’

from the article:
As his presidency drew to a close, and in the years since, he has become more and more interested in the advantages of dictatorship, and the absolute control over the military that he believes it would deliver. “I need the kind of generals that Hitler had,” Trump said in a private conversation in the White House, according to two people who heard him say this. “People who were totally loyal to him, that follow orders.” (“This is absolutely false,” Pfeiffer wrote in an email. “President Trump never said this.”)
Why run with the claim without any reference to the denial?
 
They have no other plays left.

True, Harris is now back to trying her ORIGINAL attacks against Trump since all the others have failed.
  • Orange man bad failed.
  • Joy failed.
  • Home spun girl failed.
  • Avoiding media failed.
  • Pursuing media failed.
  • Building forward (away from her own policies) failed.
  • Supporting Israel failed.
  • Supporting Gaza failed.
  • So here we are right back to Orange Man Bad again.
Nothing is working. Harris is getting booed right out of her own rallies.
The democrat ship is sinking fast like a house of cards.
 
True, Harris is now back to trying her ORIGINAL attacks against Trump since all the others have failed.
  • Orange man bad failed.
  • Joy failed.
  • Home spun girl failed.
  • Avoiding media failed.
  • Pursuing media failed.
  • Building forward (away from her own policies) failed.
  • Supporting Israel failed.
  • Supporting Gaza failed.
  • So here we are right back to Orange Man Bad again.
Nothing is working. Harris is getting booed right out of her own rallies.
The democrat ship is sinking fast like a house of cards.
Not so fast, I heard harris is about to drop a bombshell report that trump failed to rewind a movie he returned to blockbuster in 1993!

Pretty much makes him Hitler and racist because a black family rented it next
 
I have a question for those who are voting for/voted for Trump:

When you see Trump have words of praise for dictators and autocrats like Putin, Xi, Kim and Orban, when he wishes his generals were like those of Hitler, and when you hear the words he uses to describe people -- human beings -- on American soil like "vermin", "garbage", and "animals", can you understand why people across the political spectrum might have concerns from a historical perspective?

It's a fair, clear, pertinent, and direct question. I'm expecting more personal attacks than straight, honest answers, and that would be an answer in itself. So that's okay.

Trump calls political enemies ‘vermin,’ echoing dictators Hitler, Mussolini​

Trump speaks the truth. You are vermin.
 
They pretend
There he goes again speaking to the forum as if we are some third party--- an ant under his giant microscope. 🐜
Worse, he includes another ill-defined, baseless argument of "pretending."

not to know about his usage of these words, or their historical context.
Historical context can apply to anything unless you say how you mean it in WHICH history and WHAT context. Then says it is clear and defined to avoid being SPECIFIC, so that no one can counter his vagarities. With the Left, you have to GUESS at everything they say because the NEVER define their arguments, refuse to expand on them, then walk away when to corner them, always saying that either:
  1. They already told you.
  2. That it is obvious.
  3. That if they have to tell you again, they can't be bothered wasting time on you despite the fact that THEY are the one's who STARTED the argument!!!
In fairness, they may not.
Nothing Mac says is ever honest, therefore, cannot ever be fair.

Maybe history isn't their strong suit,
History of what? Which history. Be specific.

and they're sure as hell not told about any of this in their world.
Told what? Which "world?"
 
15th post
The claim comes from a misleading headline:

Trump: ‘I Need the Kind of Generals That Hitler Had’

from the article:

Why run with the claim without any reference to the denial?
Considering everything that has gone on since 2016? Unless I have video of the behavior, or folks confirming what they are accused of having done or said, I just don't believe anything anymore.

The most insulting, is when these accusations of sexual improprieties come out, months and weeks before any election. From either side.

How dumb are folks?

I guess it works, or they wouldn't keep doing this crap.
 
Trump committed treasonous, historic crimes:
BULL
attempting to overturn a presidential election,
BULL
disenfranchise millions of Americans,
BULL
and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.
BULL. Prove any of that and I'll buy you a box of Bolivar perfecto cigars. 🚬
For more than two hours Trump did nothing to stop the violent, lawless attack of the Capitol Building
BULL. No one has demonstrated that a mere tweet would have changed anything, but he did try tweeting, 45 minutes after he found out about it, not two hours, and two more times, same effect---- nothing, because no one is checking Twitter on their cellphone in the heat of a riot, nor did Trump have autocratic control to just switch these people OFF since he never switched them ON in the first place.
– an attack he himself incited.
BULL.
There’s Trump’s disgraceful, reprehensible attempt to exploit fallen American soldiers for crass political theater.
BULL.
It’s utter madness to want Trump in the WH – completely insane.
Except that the alternative to Trump is HARRIS, who is demonstratively 100X worse.
 
The claim comes from a misleading headline:

Trump: ‘I Need the Kind of Generals That Hitler Had’

from the article:

Why run with the claim without any reference to the denial?
Because I trust the source far more than I trust you or Trump.

And those other words in the OP? All directly from him, although you people evidently don't know that.

I'll take your response to mean that you're not concerned. Got it.
 
Back
Top Bottom