Trump's War On Reality Won't End Well

Your argument has no merits. You want everyone to comply with the norms you believe in.

My argument is based on reality. If you want to deny it, you can, but you can't demand everyone else has to.

Norms exist for a reason.
 
And you say I'm the one obessed with genitals.

up your adderall.
You are. Because you’re obsessed with the “reality” of sex which is determined by genitalia.

It’s all that matters to you, which is why you think it’s perfectly normal to ask someone if they have a penis, since this is “your business”.

All I’m saying is that you should stop caring and just accept what is being advertised because someone’s genitals are none of your business.
 
You are. Because you’re obsessed with the “reality” of sex which is determined by genitalia.

It’s all that matters to you, which is why you think it’s perfectly normal to ask someone if they have a penis, since this is “your business”.

All I’m saying is that you should stop caring and just accept what is being advertised because someone’s genitals are none of your business.

Same tired round and round from one of the board's biggest morons.
 
Again going to sexuality and ignoring this is about sex.

You can't debate on the merits, you have to deflect with language games.
Actually, the topic is about First Amendment rights.

You're the one that turned it into this being about sex.

Which is what closeted individuals do.
 
That federal judge does, and it is absolutely funny.

Just not for you. Enjoy the woke world you live in, complete with a First Amendment that prevents you from doing anything about it.

Now that's some funny shit right there.
You’re free to look as stupid as you wish pal.
 
Actually, the topic is about First Amendment rights.

You're the one that turned it into this being about sex.

Which is what closeted individuals do.

You mean the 1st amendment rights the left wants to kill for anyone to the right of them?
 

Trump: unfair for Iran to lack ballistic missiles if other countries have them​

PARIS, June 17 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said ‌on Wednesday that it would be unfair for Iran not to have ballistic missiles if other countries have them.
"I'm saying that ⁠if other countries have them, it's a little bit unfair for them not to have some," Trump told reporters in Paris.
"If Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and they all have some, I would ‌say ⁠in relative proportion, I think it's okay."
Trump also said the United States would leave its military in the ⁠Gulf "for a while" after Washington struck a deal with Tehran to end its ⁠nearly four-month conflict in the region.

https://www.reuters.com/3fec1b0a85a...iles-if-other-countries-have-them-2026-06-17/

Gulp.

Trump Says Iranian Missiles Don’t Matter Despite Attacking Obama Deal for Allowing Them | National Review

It’s a staggering turnaround for Trump, who is now making the same mistake that Obama made.

I'm not sure this really needs further commentary. Except to say trump supporters unironically shaking their heads in agreement with both statements at different times is what would be fodder for a satirical skit on SNL. Obama........ballistic missiles terrible. trump...........ballistic missiles are only fair. Orwell called it doublethink. For trump's followers it's called normalcy.
 

Trump: unfair for Iran to lack ballistic missiles if other countries have them​

PARIS, June 17 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said ‌on Wednesday that it would be unfair for Iran not to have ballistic missiles if other countries have them.
"I'm saying that ⁠if other countries have them, it's a little bit unfair for them not to have some," Trump told reporters in Paris.
"If Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and they all have some, I would ‌say ⁠in relative proportion, I think it's okay."
Trump also said the United States would leave its military in the ⁠Gulf "for a while" after Washington struck a deal with Tehran to end its ⁠nearly four-month conflict in the region.

https://www.reuters.com/3fec1b0a85a...iles-if-other-countries-have-them-2026-06-17/

Gulp.

Trump Says Iranian Missiles Don’t Matter Despite Attacking Obama Deal for Allowing Them | National Review

It’s a staggering turnaround for Trump, who is now making the same mistake that Obama made.

I'm not sure this really needs further commentary. Except to say trump supporters unironically shaking their heads in agreement with both statements at different times is what would be fodder for a satirical skit on SNL. Obama........ballistic missiles terrible. trump...........ballistic missiles are only fair. Orwell called it doublethink. For trump's followers it's called normalcy.

WTF is next? Allowing them a civilian nuclear program?

1781810136677.webp


It's only fair!
 
So begins a federal court order striking Trump’s Third Reich-inspired “Stop WOKE” Act in Florida, variations of which have spread through the US like a nasty airborne disease.

Invoking George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, U.S. District Court Judge Mark Walker slammed Stop WOKE, the authoritarian movement afoot in many US states to forcibly impose the tenets of far right, white nationalism on classrooms, universities, and corporate boardrooms. Since then, a total of 14 states have successfully passed 20 anti-DEI laws, part of Trump’s broader nationwide push; over 80 anti-DEI bills and hundreds of educational gag orders have been introduced across the country since 2023.

As long as the First Amendment stands, a state cannot “muzzle its university professors, impose its own orthodoxy of viewpoints, and cast us all into the dark.”


Anti woke laws struck down-check.


View attachment 1270099
Ilmao at leftists accusing right of War on reality. U guys couldn't b more intellectually dishonest
 
Now we have Democrats lecturing on reality? That's funny, in an absurd kind of way
A lot of anti-woke stuff can slide into racist, sexist, or “shut up about inequality” territory.

Another version:
  • Woke: “Yo, pay attention, some folks been getting treated unfair.”
  • Anti-woke: “Man, stop making everything about race/gender.”
  • Racist anti-woke: “Nah, those people are the problem,” or “equal treatment” while really meaning “keep things the way they were.”

So:
  • Anti-woke ≠ always racist
  • But anti-woke can be a cover for racism
  • And sometimes it’s just people hating preachy politics, not hating people

The big tell is this:
If someone’s only “anti-woke” because they dislike lectures, fine.
If they use “anti-woke” to dismiss racism, mock minorities, or defend unfair treatment, then yeah, that’s racist-adjacent or straight-up racist. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom