Trump’s Wall Costs $21.6 Billion; Illegal Immigration Costs $148.3 Billion Per Year

[Correll]

As a Sovereign People we have the right to decide who we invite into our community.


Our laws are being massively violated.


That is an immigration problem and your denial is a vile lie.

the express power is naturalization, not immigration.

merely creating an underclass of "illegals" is not a capital solution.

That is the status quo you support.


I want to deport them all, and build the wall to stop them from coming back.

lol. there is no immigration clause. it is an Establishment clause for an uniform rule of Naturalization.

We don't want to naturalize them.


We want them to go home. You should too. It is obvious that you are more loyal to your fellow Mexicans than to your supposedly fellow Americans.

in right wing fantasy all things are possible.

We have a Constitution and the establishment clause is Express not Implied.

Nothing fantasy about the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.

 

[danielpalos]

the express power is naturalization, not immigration.

merely creating an underclass of "illegals" is not a capital solution.

That is the status quo you support.


I want to deport them all, and build the wall to stop them from coming back.

lol. there is no immigration clause. it is an Establishment clause for an uniform rule of Naturalization.

We don't want to naturalize them.


We want them to go home. You should too. It is obvious that you are more loyal to your fellow Mexicans than to your supposedly fellow Americans.

in right wing fantasy all things are possible.

We have a Constitution and the establishment clause is Express not Implied.

Nothing fantasy about the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.

we know the right wing doesn't really care about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

why should we take them seriously about less fortunate illegals.

 

[Correll]

That is the status quo you support.


I want to deport them all, and build the wall to stop them from coming back.

lol. there is no immigration clause. it is an Establishment clause for an uniform rule of Naturalization.

We don't want to naturalize them.


We want them to go home. You should too. It is obvious that you are more loyal to your fellow Mexicans than to your supposedly fellow Americans.

in right wing fantasy all things are possible.

We have a Constitution and the establishment clause is Express not Implied.

Nothing fantasy about the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.

we know the right wing doesn't really care about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

why should we take them seriously about less fortunate illegals.

What you "know" is irrelevant to the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.


Deport them all. Build the Wall.

 

[boedicca]

And a wall will be even cheaper if Mexico builds one on their southern border.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...an_pit_stop_has_one_answer.html#ixzz5bCamZPzJ

 

[bripat9643]

there is no immigration clause. we have lousy naturalization policies.

national capitalists make money on border policy and national socialists don't care about losing money on border policy; Capitalism, what is that Sayeth national socialists.

As a Sovereign People we have the right to decide who we invite into our community.


Our laws are being massively violated.


That is an immigration problem and your denial is a vile lie.

the express power is naturalization, not immigration.

merely creating an underclass of "illegals" is not a capital solution.

That is the status quo you support.


I want to deport them all, and build the wall to stop them from coming back.

lol. there is no immigration clause. it is an Establishment clause for an uniform rule of Naturalization.

We don't want to naturalize them.


We want them to go home. You should too. It is obvious that you are more loyal to your fellow Mexicans than to your supposedly fellow Americans.

Left wingers love Mexicans so much that you have to wonder why they all don't move to Mexico

 

[boedicca]

As a Sovereign People we have the right to decide who we invite into our community.


Our laws are being massively violated.


That is an immigration problem and your denial is a vile lie.

the express power is naturalization, not immigration.

merely creating an underclass of "illegals" is not a capital solution.

That is the status quo you support.


I want to deport them all, and build the wall to stop them from coming back.

lol. there is no immigration clause. it is an Establishment clause for an uniform rule of Naturalization.

We don't want to naturalize them.


We want them to go home. You should too. It is obvious that you are more loyal to your fellow Mexicans than to your supposedly fellow Americans.

Left wingers love Mexicans so much that you have to wonder why they all don't move to Mexico

They love Venezuela even more, and yet inexplicably have not yet immigrated to that Socialist Paradise.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. there is no immigration clause. it is an Establishment clause for an uniform rule of Naturalization.

We don't want to naturalize them.


We want them to go home. You should too. It is obvious that you are more loyal to your fellow Mexicans than to your supposedly fellow Americans.

in right wing fantasy all things are possible.

We have a Constitution and the establishment clause is Express not Implied.

Nothing fantasy about the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.

we know the right wing doesn't really care about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

why should we take them seriously about less fortunate illegals.

What you "know" is irrelevant to the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.


Deport them all. Build the Wall.

this is the law: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

why be illegal to our own laws but blame less fortunate illegals.

 

[Correll]

We don't want to naturalize them.


We want them to go home. You should too. It is obvious that you are more loyal to your fellow Mexicans than to your supposedly fellow Americans.

in right wing fantasy all things are possible.

We have a Constitution and the establishment clause is Express not Implied.

Nothing fantasy about the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.

we know the right wing doesn't really care about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

why should we take them seriously about less fortunate illegals.

What you "know" is irrelevant to the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.


Deport them all. Build the Wall.

this is the law: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

why be illegal to our own laws but blame less fortunate illegals.

Better to send them home. To the nations they are actually loyal to. Like with you and Mexico.

 

[danielpalos]

in right wing fantasy all things are possible.

We have a Constitution and the establishment clause is Express not Implied.

Nothing fantasy about the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.

we know the right wing doesn't really care about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

why should we take them seriously about less fortunate illegals.

What you "know" is irrelevant to the fact that our democratically enacted laws are that these illegals should not be here.


Deport them all. Build the Wall.

this is the law: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

why be illegal to our own laws but blame less fortunate illegals.

Better to send them home. To the nations they are actually loyal to. Like with you and Mexico.

i don't need to take infidels, protestants, renegades, or unconstitutionals seriously.

 

[Lesh]

there is no wall building power. the commerce clause must be our common defense.

Your meaningless babble is noted and dismissed.


Controlling who and want enters a nation is the most basic function of good governance.


Only an enemy of the people would be against that.


You should return to the nation you are actually loyal to.

Mindlessly repeating your babble does nothing for you.

Are you saying that we should seall ALL our borders?

Sure sounds like it.

The wall is a SYMBOL. A very expensive inefficient symbol

The Third World is not stampeding across all our borders.


Walls work. If you lefties did not think the wall would not work, you would not be so afraid of it.

lousy right wing management has wars on crime, drugs, and terror they refuse to pay wartime tax rates for, and complain about their social results.

I'm willing to pay to deport all the illegals and build the Wall.


You should go home. YOu are not loyal to your fellow Americans.

Great. Pony up the ,money to deport 11 million people (or the 30 million you claim).

How's you bank account look?

 

[Correll]

Your meaningless babble is noted and dismissed.


Controlling who and want enters a nation is the most basic function of good governance.


Only an enemy of the people would be against that.


You should return to the nation you are actually loyal to.

Mindlessly repeating your babble does nothing for you.

Are you saying that we should seall ALL our borders?

Sure sounds like it.

The wall is a SYMBOL. A very expensive inefficient symbol

The Third World is not stampeding across all our borders.


Walls work. If you lefties did not think the wall would not work, you would not be so afraid of it.

lousy right wing management has wars on crime, drugs, and terror they refuse to pay wartime tax rates for, and complain about their social results.

I'm willing to pay to deport all the illegals and build the Wall.


You should go home. YOu are not loyal to your fellow Americans.

Great. Pony up the ,money to deport 11 million people (or the 30 million you claim).

How's you bank account look?

Quite good actually. We exceeded our investment goals for the year.


And I'm happy to pay my share. It is exactly the type of joint sacrifice, joint gain that epitomizes the reason for taxes.

 

[Lesh]

Quite good actually. We exceeded our investment goals for the year.


And I'm happy to pay my share. It is exactly the type of joint sacrifice, joint gain that epitomizes the reason for taxes.

Thanks for the brag.

So you're going to personally fund deportation of the 30 million people you claim are here?

What do you suppose that would cost?

You got a couple hundred billion in your account?

 

[Correll]

Quite good actually. We exceeded our investment goals for the year.


And I'm happy to pay my share. It is exactly the type of joint sacrifice, joint gain that epitomizes the reason for taxes.

Thanks for the brag.

So you're going to personally fund deportation of the 30 million people you claim are here?

What do you suppose that would cost?

You got a couple hundred billion in your account?

Your odd slant of trying to put this on me and just me personally is a sure sign that you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.


It is amazing to me that you can, on one level, KNOW that you have to be dishonest to "defend" your position, and yet not be able to understand that that means that you are in the wrong.


Seriously. What do you to to twist your mind like that? Play both sides of chess games since early childhood?

 

[Lesh]

Your odd slant of trying to put this on me and just me personally is a sure sign that you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.

Well you claimed you would pay for it and then bragged about how much money you supposedly had. Poney up

 

[Correll]

Your odd slant of trying to put this on me and just me personally is a sure sign that you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.

Well you claimed you would pay for it and then bragged about how much money you supposedly had. Poney up

Your dishonesty has already been addressed. No need to parade it around more.

 

[Lesh]

What dishonesty are you lying about?

 

[Correll]

What dishonesty are you lying about?

Dumbass.


Your odd slant of trying to put this on me and just me personally is a sure sign that you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.


It is amazing to me that you can, on one level, KNOW that you have to be dishonest to "defend" your position, and yet not be able to understand that that means that you are in the wrong.


Seriously. What do you to to twist your mind like that? Play both sides of chess games since early childhood?

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy with a Commerce Clause.

 

[Correll]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy with a Commerce Clause.

Your gibberish is noted and dismissed.


Controlling who and what enters a community is the most basic function of good government.


Only an enemy of that community could oppose that.


YOu are an enemy of our community.

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy with a Commerce Clause.

Your gibberish is noted and dismissed.


Controlling who and what enters a community is the most basic function of good government.


Only an enemy of that community could oppose that.


YOu are an enemy of our community.

national capitalists make money on border policy. national socialists lose money on border policy.

we don't have an Immigration clause it is expressly declared a Naturalization clause.