P@triot
Diamond Member
No, you’re not, at all. You’re also not good at reading or writing.nice story, national socialists are good at telling stories.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, you’re not, at all. You’re also not good at reading or writing.nice story, national socialists are good at telling stories.
We should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause. A wall is Spending.Indisputable proof that the left is lying (as always)...
‘They don’t even try’: Hungary’s new border fence called ‘spectacular success’
i resort to fewer fallacies.No, you’re not, at all. You’re also not good at reading or writing.nice story, national socialists are good at telling stories.
We have no immigration clause, we an express establishment clause for naturalization, not right wing bigotry.The "Border Wall" can't even stop a extremely pregnant woman from climbing over just before her baby comes out. Reagan & Republicans rolled out the welcome mat for foreigners. Democrat Obama created negative illegal migration.
Flag saluting constitution waving & screaming Repubtards refuse to alter the US Constitution that draws them here! Trumptards controlled the White house, Senate, House, Governorships & Supreme Court, but REFUSED to alter the Constitution to End "Birthright Citizenship"!
That is a completely nonsensical statement. It is literally like saying “we should have no crime with laws” or “we should have no poor with money circulating”. People in other nations who attempt to come here illegally don’t care about our “naturalization clause”. You’re so desperate for attention, you’ll just post any nonsense.We should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause.
Good God...you are hands down the dumbest living human being alive today.We have no immigration clause, we an express establishment clause for naturalization, not right wing bigotry.
we don't have an immigration clause. a naturalization clause means people have to apply for citizenship if they are here.That is a completely nonsensical statement. It is literally like saying “we should have no crime with laws” or “we should have no poor with money circulating”. People in other nations who attempt to come here illegally don’t care about our “naturalization clause”. You’re so desperate for attention, you’ll just post any nonsense.We should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause.
Good God...you are hands down the dumbest living human being alive today. Applying for citizenship is the textbook definition of “immigration”.we don't have an immigration clause. a naturalization clause means people have to apply for citizenship if they are here.

we have an express establishment clause for naturalization not immigration, every time we have to get serious.Good God...you are hands down the dumbest living human being alive today. Applying for citizenship is the textbook definition of “immigration”.we don't have an immigration clause. a naturalization clause means people have to apply for citizenship if they are here.
View attachment 242355
There is no express wall building power. Government should never be shut down over any Implied powers.One can always rely on left-wing actions to cost more while simultaneously culminating in worse results. We saw that with Obama and the Democrats when they “promised” their stimulus package would ensure that unemployment would never hit 8%. Instead, for almost a trillion dollars, unemployment skyrocketed to over 10%.
We see this sad reality once again with the border wall and subsequent government shutdown. For $5 billion we could have funded about 1/5 of the total wall. But instead, Democrats cost us $6 billion for absolutely nothing. Nothing. We have nothing to show for that $6 billion, when for $5 billion we could have had a substantial increase in border security.
Report: Standard & Poor's claims gov't shutdown will cost more than border wall
There is no express wall building power. Government should never be shut down over any Implied powers.One can always rely on left-wing actions to cost more while simultaneously culminating in worse results. We saw that with Obama and the Democrats when they “promised” their stimulus package would ensure that unemployment would never hit 8%. Instead, for almost a trillion dollars, unemployment skyrocketed to over 10%.
We see this sad reality once again with the border wall and subsequent government shutdown. For $5 billion we could have funded about 1/5 of the total wall. But instead, Democrats cost us $6 billion for absolutely nothing. Nothing. We have nothing to show for that $6 billion, when for $5 billion we could have had a substantial increase in border security.
Report: Standard & Poor's claims gov't shutdown will cost more than border wall
we have a profit motive for the wall and a manufactured social motive where Government solves the problem not Capitalism.There is no express wall building power. Government should never be shut down over any Implied powers.One can always rely on left-wing actions to cost more while simultaneously culminating in worse results. We saw that with Obama and the Democrats when they “promised” their stimulus package would ensure that unemployment would never hit 8%. Instead, for almost a trillion dollars, unemployment skyrocketed to over 10%.
We see this sad reality once again with the border wall and subsequent government shutdown. For $5 billion we could have funded about 1/5 of the total wall. But instead, Democrats cost us $6 billion for absolutely nothing. Nothing. We have nothing to show for that $6 billion, when for $5 billion we could have had a substantial increase in border security.
Report: Standard & Poor's claims gov't shutdown will cost more than border wall
Republicans don't know the half of it
This has to be fact checked. But one thing is definitely true - the $5B Trump wants now is just the down payment. He plans to spend $25B altogether.
“Mr. Abramovich, a Russian national with Israeli citizenship, is an ally of Russian president Putin, and a personal friend of Donald Trump and his son in law (Trump has enjoyed many jaunts aboard Abramovich’s luxury yacht). Mr. Abramovich is part owner (with several other Russian billionaires) of a steel company called Evraz - located in Canada - which, coincidentally, is the only one which can manufacture the specific type of metal beams Mr. Trump wants for his wall. (There was a Chinese company which could deliver the same product, but since Mr. Trump's trade war with China, they can no longer effectively provide it to the US.)
If the wall is built, Mr. Abramovich's company - in which Russian president Putin also happens to own stock through a complicated series of shell companies - stands to make roughly one billion US dollars during the first stage of construction alone. By the time the wall is completed, with costs estimated to run to almost 30 billion dollars (not 5 billion as the Republican parrots have been squawking), Evraz will likely triple in value.”
Small wonder ‘The Don’ is intransigent, if Trump doesn't get his wall he's a dead man. they will not be happy if they don't see a return from their 'investment' - and ‘their’ man!
Does Trump want a wall to KEEP IN all those many 1000's with expired visas?? Why doesn't the moron start there??simply using the Other Peoples' tax money is socialism.
Oh snowflake...we've been over this dozens of times already. No matter how many times you attempt to deny reality, it will not change reality. Haven't you learned that by now?There is no express immigration clause so it cannot be about beling legal to the law.