Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 40,045
- 17,885
- 2,173
Seems personal. Good grounds for a lawsuit.The boss. Get used to it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems personal. Good grounds for a lawsuit.The boss. Get used to it.
Apparently it’s not over, because Trump is looking for revenge.The documents and the J6 thingy are over. Rational Americans don’t believe either.
So the president thinks he’s above the law. Gotcha.
I think punishing people who go after criminals no matter who they are is wrong.
Civil servants are protected from retaliation and that’s what this is.
It will be interesting to see what happens.Punishing people for doing their jobs well isn’t the right thing to do.
Trump deserved to have his house raided and it’s all because of his own choices. He can’t blame anyone but himself.
so what if it's personal? The President has the personal choice who works for him, the entire power of the Executive vest in the President. Nobody has a right to work for the President.Seems personal. Good grounds for a lawsuit.
Sorry, the Germans tried that back after the war too...you demfascsit need some new material.Punishing people for doing their jobs well isn’t the right thing to do.
Trump deserved to have his house raided and it’s all because of his own choices. He can’t blame anyone but himself.
Our founding fathers wrote search warrants into the constitution. Do you think the constitution is fascist?Sorry, the Germans tried that back after the war too...you demfascsit need some new material.
Nope, I think aboving your office is fascist. The Germans tried to claim they had lawful orders as a defense too.Our founding fathers wrote search warrants into the constitution. Do you think the constitution is fascist?
Then getting a search warrant for Mar a Lago wasn't fascist. Great!Nope, I think aboving your office is fascist. The Germans tried to claim they had lawful orders as a defense too.
Civil servants have protections. We evolved past the spoils system long ago as it was a very corrupt way of governing the country and that was proved again and again.so what if it's personal? The President has the personal choice who works for him, the entire power of the Executive vest in the President. Nobody has a right to work for the President.
They serve at the president's discretion, whether personal or professional is irrelevant. If the president is not confident in their ability to enact his agenda he has every right to rid himself of the dead weight.Seems personal. Good grounds for a lawsuit.
Nope. Read a book.They serve at the president's discretion, whether personal or professional is irrelevant. If the president is not confident in their ability to enact his agenda he has every right to rid himself of the dead weight.
ART 2, Section 1, says the power of the executive vest in A PRESIDENT.So the president thinks he’s above the law. Gotcha.
I think punishing people who go after criminals no matter who they are is wrong.
Civil servants are protected from retaliation and that’s what this is.
ART 2, Section 1, says the power of the executive vest in A PRESIDENT.
What law are you referring to? What law says that someone has the right to work for a President?
Civil servants are unelected people, the Constitution doesn't vest them with any power, the power of teh executive vest in a President, and just a President.
Abusing their office was. Germans tried to hide their criminality under color of law as wellThen getting a search warrant for Mar a Lago wasn't fascist. Great!
That silly excerpt does not apply to the president. Read the Constitution.
Your link doesn’t override the US Constitution.
It wasn't abuse. It was a good idea. They found the documents they suspected he was illegally hiding.Abusing their office was.
The president has to follow the laws.Your link doesn’t override the US Constitution.