Trump's discernment

[Avatar4321]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

 

[Kosh]

Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

Why not they run the unions!

 

[saveliberty]

Which is worse? A criminal in politics or politicians being criminal?

 

[Avatar4321]

Which is worse? A criminal in politics or politicians being criminal?

Why should we tolerate either?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

You mean like Chicago political machine mobsters? Gee who had them?

 

[Avatar4321]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

You mean like Chicago political machine mobsters? Gee who had them?

So why would we want to continue that?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

You mean like Chicago political machine mobsters? Gee who had them?

So why would we want to continue that?

I honestly don't know what names he is floating or if he even has. Politics is ugly business, I doubt any of them are squeaky clean

 

[blackhawk]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

Trump seems to think he is the best and brightest at everything and is the smartest guy in the room who does that sound like?

 

[saveliberty]

The realistic choices are Bernie finding socialists to fill positions, Hillary hiring staff worse than her campaign staff, Cruz and Rubio using the usual suspects or Trump and his "your fired" crew.

 

[Avatar4321]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

Trump seems to think he is the best and brightest at everything and is the smartest guy in the room who does that sound like?

Just about everyone on this board

 

[blackhawk]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

Trump seems to think he is the best and brightest at everything and is the smartest guy in the room who does that sound like?

Just about everyone on this board

Yeah but a select few of us actually are.

 

[Avatar4321]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

Trump seems to think he is the best and brightest at everything and is the smartest guy in the room who does that sound like?

Just about everyone on this board

Yeah but a select few of us actually are.

I don't like boasting though

 

[S.J.]

What reason do you have to believe he would have mobsters working for him?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

You mean like Chicago political machine mobsters? Gee who had them?

So why would we want to continue that?

I don't know. You could probably get an answer from an Obama voter.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

One has to ask if he was successful or not. One would have to ask if he created jobs in the process or not. One would have to ask if he was ever charged, convicted or suspected of nefarious activity or not.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Discernment doesn't matter when appointing people to political jobs.

Remember Cheney telling Jr. that he would be the best for him as VP?

How about the fact that Jr. brought in a lot of his friends which were dubbed "The Texas Mafia"?

Wanna talk about "hell of a job Brownie"?

 

[Freewill]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

Maybe so, maybe so. But one thing we know for sure is that the people surrounding the Clinton's sure were/are dirty.

Remember, this name? Mark Rich? How considering that pardon anyone can consider another Clinton in office is really hard to fathom. To this day have the Clintons ever explain why they let Rich slip the hook?

Don't vote for Trump, I won't unless up against Mrs. Bosnia Clinton, but voting for Mrs. Clinton? Really?

Bill Clinton’s pardon of fugitive Marc Rich continues to pay big | New York Post

Fifteen years ago this month, on Jan. 20, 2001, his last day in office, Bill Clinton issued a pardon for international fugitive Marc Rich. It would become perhaps the most condemned official act of Clinton’s political career. A New York Times editorial called it “a shocking abuse of presidential power.” The usually Clinton-friendly New Republic noted it “is often mentioned as Exhibit A of Clintonian sliminess.”

 

[Avatar4321]

Clinton is going to lose to Bernie. She isn't going to be a factor.

Trump's tendency to overlook mob ties in his business partners isn't exactly a secret. And if he has a history of working with them in his private ventures what reason do we have to think they would cease now?

 

[LoneLaugher]

I have to wonder how it is we are supposed to believe he is going to surround Himself with the best and brightest advisors when he has a track record of picking abysmal and down right criminal business partners. Will we have mobsters in his cabinet like he has had in his partners?

Maybe so, maybe so. But one thing we know for sure is that the people surrounding the Clinton's sure were/are dirty.

Remember, this name? Mark Rich? How considering that pardon anyone can consider another Clinton in office is really hard to fathom. To this day have the Clintons ever explain why they let Rich slip the hook?

Don't vote for Trump, I won't unless up against Mrs. Bosnia Clinton, but voting for Mrs. Clinton? Really?

Bill Clinton’s pardon of fugitive Marc Rich continues to pay big | New York Post

Fifteen years ago this month, on Jan. 20, 2001, his last day in office, Bill Clinton issued a pardon for international fugitive Marc Rich. It would become perhaps the most condemned official act of Clinton’s political career. A New York Times editorial called it “a shocking abuse of presidential power.” The usually Clinton-friendly New Republic noted it “is often mentioned as Exhibit A of Clintonian sliminess.”

The thread is about Trump.

 

[imawhosure]

Clinton is going to lose to Bernie. She isn't going to be a factor.

Trump's tendency to overlook mob ties in his business partners isn't exactly a secret. And if he has a history of working with them in his private ventures what reason do we have to think they would cease now?

I dunno, as was stated, most mob ties are union. Wouldn't that be a good thing for the Democrats?

And then, most of his projects in this country are in very large cities. (New York, Chicago, etc) Who runs those cities? Guess if had to deal with mobsters there, we have to know where they came from, correct?

And what if he actually imported them? Well we all know those "saintly" Democrats would instantly refuse to do business with him as they would be aghast; right? I mean hell, he gave money to Hillary didn't he? I am sure he is so "mobbed up" that she refused to take it, or has returned it because of her morals-)

The premise of this thread is ridiculous, but it is always fun to ask questions, for which the left has no answers!