Trump's DC Occupation Costs 4 Times More Than It Would Take to House City's Entire Homeless Population

Wash DC is already managed by the federal government they cant occupy it. They have already reduced crime significantly. Do you really think people are against that? What kind of decent American supports crime?

Picture the optics, Trump makes the city safe and democrats scream occupation. The occupation is by criminals running loose. Democrats are the party that defends crime, creates crime, covers it up and doesnt give a crap about victims. Lets see how this plays in the next election. I cant wait to see the campaign commercials.
Trump is not making the city safe, and troops sitting in a city IS a military occupation. So is the plan for troops to stay there forever? The Republican Party has a convicted felon as a leader. So it's best that you shut up about who defends crime, creates crime, covers it up, and doesn't give a crap about victims. Especially considering the Epstein situation.
 
Trump is not making the city safe, and troops sitting in a city IS a military occupation. So is the plan for troops to stay there forever? The Republican Party has a convicted felon as a leader. So it's best that you shut up about who defends crime, creates crime, covers it up, and doesn't give a crap about victims. Especially considering the Epstein situation.
Not making the city safe? Are you not admitting that the city has NOT been safe and will return to not being safe after the democrats take over again? Do you ever read what you write before posting it?
 
Not making the city safe? Are you not admitting that the city has NOT been safe and will return to not being safe after the democrats take over again? Do you ever read what you write before posting it?
Trump isn't making the city safe. Furthermore, DC is not in the top 30. So this is just a stunt done for optics nd to distract you morons from the fact he was ******* little girls with Jeffrey Epstein.
 
Trump isn't making the city safe. Furthermore, DC is not in the top 30. So this is just a stunt done for optics nd to distract you morons from the fact he was ******* little girls with Jeffrey Epstein.

Nobody is buying your crap
 
Trump isn't making the city safe. Furthermore, DC is not in the top 30. So this is just a stunt done for optics nd to distract you morons from the fact he was ******* little girls with Jeffrey Epstein.
Wow, you know so much that isn't so. One can't help but notice that you're just flinging stuff out there, hoping something will stick and you won't have to prove anything.
 
Trump is not making the city safe, and troops sitting in a city IS a military occupation. So is the plan for troops to stay there forever? The Republican Party has a convicted felon as a leader. So it's best that you shut up about who defends crime, creates crime, covers it up, and doesn't give a crap about victims. Especially considering the Epstein situation.
You defend crime all the time in fact youre the board apologist for criminals. You also cant get your facts straight.
Wash DC cant be occupied the Fed has legal jurisdiction.
Trump was convicted in a kangaroo court by a corrupt judge. Like all the rest of the lawfare that will b overturned.
Trump kicked Epstein out of his buildings and banned him.
As usual you have nothing. Nada zip zero but keep up the good work it creates opportunities for me to make you look bad. Keep them coming boobala
 
Trump has said one of his goals in DC is to do something about the homeless population. The problem with thinking on the right is that they believe that the most punitive actions are solutions for problems. Oftentimes, their punitive "solutions" cost more and are less effective than the so-called soft liberal policies they say are the problem.

Trump's DC Occupation Costs 4 Times More Than It Would Take to House City's Entire Homeless Population​

Last week, when Trump federalized Washington, DC's police force and deployed the National Guard to occupy its streets, one of his main orders was to "end vagrancy" by destroying homeless encampments and arresting and forcibly relocating the people taking shelter there.

But according to an investigation published on Wednesday by Hanna Homestead of the National Priorities Project, in collaboration with The Intercept, deploying the National Guard and "getting rid of the slums" is costing far more than it would cost to simply provide housing to every homeless person in the city.

Last week, when Trump federalized Washington, DC's police force and deployed the National Guard to occupy its streets, one of his main orders was to "end vagrancy" by destroying homeless encampments and arresting and forcibly relocating the people taking shelter there.

But according to an investigation published on Wednesday by Hanna Homestead of the National Priorities Project, in collaboration with The Intercept, deploying the National Guard and "getting rid of the slums" is costing far more than it would cost to simply provide housing to every homeless person in the city.


Governors from six US states have sent troops to Washington to help Trump's effort, swelling the ranks to nearly 2,100 who will soon be on patrol.

According to previous reporting, National Guard deployments cost the US government $530 per guard member each day. Using that figure, Homestead estimated that it would cost just over $1.1 million.

She added that "the number of troops will likely continue to grow. And with no deadline for the DC deployment, those costs could add up for months or even years."

According to the most recent data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), there are about 5,600 people experiencing either sheltered and unsheltered homelessness in DC on a given night. Operating an affordable housing unit for each one of them, the data shows, costs about $45.44 per person, per day, on average in DC.

Providing affordable housing to every homeless person in DC would cost an estimated $255,166, which is 4.3 times less than the cost of Trump's military deployment.


Draconian measures cost draconian money. And we get told how we cannot force the government to spend to provide housing for the homeless. Yet the same people who declare how it's wasteful to spend money to provide housing to the homeless, but cheer the more costly use of troops to take them off the streets.

This is why you do not elect right-wing politicians if you want real solutions.

Yet the DemoKKKrats who've run the city for 90 years never bothered.

Imagine that!
 
You defend crime all the time in fact youre the board apologist for criminals. You also cant get your facts straight.
Wash DC cant be occupied the Fed has legal jurisdiction.
Trump was convicted in a kangaroo court by a corrupt judge. Like all the rest of the lawfare that will b overturned.
Trump kicked Epstein out of his buildings and banned him.
As usual you have nothing. Nada zip zero but keep up the good work it creates opportunities for me to make you look bad. Keep them coming boobala
Trump is a convicted felon. You defend him. That's defending crime.
Shut the **** up until you demand trumps resignation and sentencing for his crimes.
 
Trump is a convicted felon. You defend him. That's defending crime.
Shut the **** up until you demand trumps resignation and sentencing for his crimes.
It will be overturned just like the civil case in NY, other cases were thrown out lawfare was failure and TRump just got stronger. How did that work out and what not like dat dere bro
 
Trump is a convicted felon. You defend him. That's defending crime.
Shut the **** up until you demand trumps resignation and sentencing for his crimes.
What crime did Trump commit?

How much time did he do?
 
No, the waste of money is going on right now. DC is not even in the top 30 for crime. If you invest in economic development, crime goes down. You right-wingers think of everything in an ass backward way. This is a siege and the ONLY reason crime is lower this week is because people are scared to go outside. After awhile they will tire of being held captive by the government, and all hell will break loose.
You're going to stick with the argument that lowering crime is bad? Damn, you're dumb...lol

The criminals are afraid to **** around, not law abiding citizens. I say that's a good thing. Why don't you?
 
15th post
You're going to stick with the argument that lowering crime is bad? Damn, you're dumb...lol

The criminals are afraid to **** around, not law abiding citizens. I say that's a good thing. Why don't you?
Trump is not lowering crime. That's a fact. If this was about lowering crime there are places with higher crime than DC, and those crime continues in those places. People don't even want to go out to eat in DC now. Trump is killing business and tourism in DC.
 
Trump is not lowering crime. That's a fact. If this was about lowering crime there are places with higher crime than DC, and those crime continues in those places. People don't even want to go out to eat in DC now. Trump is killing business and tourism in DC.
over 1000 arrests have been made many guns taken off the street carjacks way down thefts way down all in just 7 days and democrats are opposed to this. How dumb can they be. Democrats love crime thats why they have so much in their cities
 
Trump is a convicted felon. You defend him. That's defending crime.
Shut the **** up until you demand trumps resignation and sentencing for his crimes.

No kidding.
Bookkeeping misdemeanors beyond the statute of limitations.
What could be worse?
 
Back
Top Bottom