Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is using the Presidency to misinform and lie to cover-up his failures, incompetence, scandals, and critics and apply pressure on the journalist to cease or underreport those things. Instead of addressing these important issues, he deflects to attacking the media that is using its 1rst Amendment right.No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
again, how does Trump have a say in how they operate? All he does is call them out when they do something he doesn't like.
What has he done beyond calling them a bunch of wankers sometimes?
So, it looks like other than a few random nut jobs and hardcore cultists, all the sane and educated folks agree that trump is a fascist moron.
news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
Who said he has taken away the freedom of the press? He is laying the groundwork for neutralizing it and in fact taking affirmative action to neutralize it by suggesting Congress should investigate how the press reports news about him. He has taken a position that a government entity should have some kind of regulatory control of what and how the press transmits political news and government operations and position on policy.So, it looks like other than a few random nut jobs and hardcore cultists, all the sane and educated folks agree that trump is a fascist moron.
Can you answer my question? Here it is again, what freedoms of the press has he taken away? Which one is he trying to take away?
Is it sensible to "believe" who we want to believe even if the information is a verified lie?The Liar in Chief continues his attacks on the free press. That is what fascist leaders have done ever since fascism was created. It is the first and most important tenet of fascism. It is what makes adoption of other tenets of fascism possible.
It is not the government's job to decide what and how a free society reports and transmits news and opinion, especially news and opinion about political issues.
President Trump puts out and promotes more misinformation, lies, and fake news than any American President in history. It is what he is best known for and will be his legacy. The President is the last person in a free society that should be lecturing about fake news and the last person in a free society that should be attempting to restrict the free press.
Trump's suggestion that the press should be investigated by Congress is an attempt to make a fascist tenet acceptable.
How better to solidify power than to call the free press into contempt
Do not believe what they say...they are not to be trusted
I am the only one you can trust, Believe me
The people are free to believe who they want to believe.
That is the strength and weakness of any representative form of government.
Your just mad that progressives and their less left allies are no longer the ones in total control of the narrative.
If your side has the truth, and is right, you shouldn't have to worry about your so called falsehoods from the other side.
I have been very concerned about Trump's attack on the media since he began all this fake news business. Ironic considering he is the one making up most of the "fake" news, not the media. He NEVER criticizes actually made up shit by the right wing sites he likes to visit, only news that is critical of him.
This is very dangerous and a commonly used ploy of a dictator to be. You should know that.
huh? the entire OP is about taking away the 1st amendment right of the press. and you got fking squat to make that statement. groundwork, by what offering up another explanation that is fair and balanced unlike them? LOL.Who said he has taken away the freedom of the press? He is laying the groundwork for neutralizing it and in fact taking affirmative action to neutralize it by suggesting Congress should investigate how the press reports news about him. He has taken a position that a government entity should have some kind of regulatory control of what and how the press transmits political news and government operations and position on policy.So, it looks like other than a few random nut jobs and hardcore cultists, all the sane and educated folks agree that trump is a fascist moron.
Can you answer my question? Here it is again, what freedoms of the press has he taken away? Which one is he trying to take away?
A government should never be in a position to regulate news and information to the public unless it concerns national security issues of a classified nature.
Says who? The founders made the 1rst Amendment to include a free press. The press at the time was reporting biased political news to support the revolution. You obviously know nothing about how and why the free press was included in the very 1rst amendment to the Constitution. Ever heard of Thomas Paine and a little publication called "Common Sense"? How about Ben Franklyn's Pennsylvania Gazette? Oops, your an uneducated dunce.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
ok,, then what is the threat exactly from Trump? he hasn't attempted to stop their presses. so again, the issue is?Says who? The founders made the 1rst Amendment to include a free press. The press at the time was reporting biased political news to support the revolution. You obviously know nothing about how and why the free press was included in the very 1rst amendment to the Constitution. Ever heard of Thomas Paine and a little publication called "Common Sense"? How about Ben Franklyn's Pennsylvania Gazette? Oops, your an uneducated dunce.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
That sounds like a paranoid conspiracy theory. I don't recall Trump ever suggesting Congress should investigate the press. Even if he did, investigation is one thing, regulating is another. What has you scared is the thought that the public will learn how the press actually operates, and they won't be pleased.Who said he has taken away the freedom of the press? He is laying the groundwork for neutralizing it and in fact taking affirmative action to neutralize it by suggesting Congress should investigate how the press reports news about him. He has taken a position that a government entity should have some kind of regulatory control of what and how the press transmits political news and government operations and position on policy.So, it looks like other than a few random nut jobs and hardcore cultists, all the sane and educated folks agree that trump is a fascist moron.
Can you answer my question? Here it is again, what freedoms of the press has he taken away? Which one is he trying to take away?
A government should never be in a position to regulate news and information to the public unless it concerns national security issues of a classified nature.
Who said he has taken away the freedom of the press? He is laying the groundwork for neutralizing it and in fact taking affirmative action to neutralize it by suggesting Congress should investigate how the press reports news about him. He has taken a position that a government entity should have some kind of regulatory control of what and how the press transmits political news and government operations and position on policy.So, it looks like other than a few random nut jobs and hardcore cultists, all the sane and educated folks agree that trump is a fascist moron.
Can you answer my question? Here it is again, what freedoms of the press has he taken away? Which one is he trying to take away?
A government should never be in a position to regulate news and information to the public unless it concerns national security issues of a classified nature.
news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
FOX News claims to be impartial. "Fair and Balanced". Almost all news organizations make the same claim that they are objective in news reporting if not with their editorial and commentary positions. Usually, it seems like when people discuss this topic they mix the general news reporting and the commentary together. For a truly fair analysis, the two must be separated. Some news sources make a genuine effort to provide opposing viewpoints by providing commentaries from a wide spectrum of political viewpoints in their opinion and editorial sections, or on TV, by having a varied guest list to provide differing views.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
It can be political, but it can't dress up as impartial while doing it.
I have no issue with MSNBC being a liberal rag, what I have an issue with is them claiming they are not.
FOX News claims to be impartial. "Fair and Balanced". Almost all news organizations make the same claim that they are objective in news reporting if not with their editorial and commentary positions. Usually, it seems like when people discuss this topic they mix the general news reporting and the commentary together. For a truly fair analysis, the two must be separated. Some news sources make a genuine effort to provide opposing viewpoints by providing commentaries from a wide spectrum of political viewpoints in their opinion and editorial sections, or on TV, by having a varied guest list to provide differing views.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
It can be political, but it can't dress up as impartial while doing it.
I have no issue with MSNBC being a liberal rag, what I have an issue with is them claiming they are not.
CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC and CBS use their "news" division to push a given view point. There's simply no denying it.FOX News claims to be impartial. "Fair and Balanced". Almost all news organizations make the same claim that they are objective in news reporting if not with their editorial and commentary positions. Usually, it seems like when people discuss this topic they mix the general news reporting and the commentary together. For a truly fair analysis, the two must be separated. Some news sources make a genuine effort to provide opposing viewpoints by providing commentaries from a wide spectrum of political viewpoints in their opinion and editorial sections, or on TV, by having a varied guest list to provide differing views.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.A free press is the greatest threat to tyrants
and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
It can be political, but it can't dress up as impartial while doing it.
I have no issue with MSNBC being a liberal rag, what I have an issue with is them claiming they are not.
I am not sure about the lying claim, lying may not always be the case. Sometimes it is a matter of interpreting subjective facts or basing the reporting on misinformation, disinformation or just poor journalism.FOX News claims to be impartial. "Fair and Balanced". Almost all news organizations make the same claim that they are objective in news reporting if not with their editorial and commentary positions. Usually, it seems like when people discuss this topic they mix the general news reporting and the commentary together. For a truly fair analysis, the two must be separated. Some news sources make a genuine effort to provide opposing viewpoints by providing commentaries from a wide spectrum of political viewpoints in their opinion and editorial sections, or on TV, by having a varied guest list to provide differing views.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
It can be political, but it can't dress up as impartial while doing it.
I have no issue with MSNBC being a liberal rag, what I have an issue with is them claiming they are not.
So Fox news lies just like the rest, but lies from the other side.
No current news org is impartial. they all are biased.
I am not sure about the lying claim, lying may not always be the case. Sometimes it is a matter of interpreting subjective facts or basing the reporting on misinformation, disinformation or just poor journalism.FOX News claims to be impartial. "Fair and Balanced". Almost all news organizations make the same claim that they are objective in news reporting if not with their editorial and commentary positions. Usually, it seems like when people discuss this topic they mix the general news reporting and the commentary together. For a truly fair analysis, the two must be separated. Some news sources make a genuine effort to provide opposing viewpoints by providing commentaries from a wide spectrum of political viewpoints in their opinion and editorial sections, or on TV, by having a varied guest list to provide differing views.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
It can be political, but it can't dress up as impartial while doing it.
I have no issue with MSNBC being a liberal rag, what I have an issue with is them claiming they are not.
So Fox news lies just like the rest, but lies from the other side.
No current news org is impartial. they all are biased.
I agree that most news sources are biased one way or another, I just don't view that as a negative. It is how the news media began in this country. Benjamin Franklyn and Thomas Paine were biased as were all the other sources of news during and before the Revolution. They were biased and the founders were well aware of biased reporting when they wrote the 1rst Amendment. It is the motivation that influences people to enter and operate in that industry.
Um, how many people did Obama put in jail for talking? How many reporters were survailed?The Liar in Chief continues his attacks on the free press. That is what fascist leaders have done ever since fascism was created. It is the first and most important tenet of fascism. It is what makes adoption of other tenets of fascism possible.
It is not the government's job to decide what and how a free society reports and transmits news and opinion, especially news and opinion about political issues.
President Trump puts out and promotes more misinformation, lies, and fake news than any American President in history. It is what he is best known for and will be his legacy. The President is the last person in a free society that should be lecturing about fake news and the last person in a free society that should be attempting to restrict the free press.
Trump's suggestion that the press should be investigated by Congress is an attempt to make a fascist tenet acceptable.
It does not have to be denied. News organizations have a right and even an obligation to report the news as they see it, with whatever spin they want to put on it.CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC and CBS use their "news" division to push a given view point. There's simply no denying it.FOX News claims to be impartial. "Fair and Balanced". Almost all news organizations make the same claim that they are objective in news reporting if not with their editorial and commentary positions. Usually, it seems like when people discuss this topic they mix the general news reporting and the commentary together. For a truly fair analysis, the two must be separated. Some news sources make a genuine effort to provide opposing viewpoints by providing commentaries from a wide spectrum of political viewpoints in their opinion and editorial sections, or on TV, by having a varied guest list to provide differing views.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.and a progressive lapdog press is the greatest threat to individual freedoms.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
It can be political, but it can't dress up as impartial while doing it.
I have no issue with MSNBC being a liberal rag, what I have an issue with is them claiming they are not.
It does not have to be denied. News organizations have a right and even an obligation to report the news as they see it, with whatever spin they want to put on it.CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC and CBS use their "news" division to push a given view point. There's simply no denying it.FOX News claims to be impartial. "Fair and Balanced". Almost all news organizations make the same claim that they are objective in news reporting if not with their editorial and commentary positions. Usually, it seems like when people discuss this topic they mix the general news reporting and the commentary together. For a truly fair analysis, the two must be separated. Some news sources make a genuine effort to provide opposing viewpoints by providing commentaries from a wide spectrum of political viewpoints in their opinion and editorial sections, or on TV, by having a varied guest list to provide differing views.news reporting is supposed to be impartial and not political, oops!No, it isn't. There are plenty of alternative press sources to counter what your so-called progressive press reports. A free press has news reporting from the entire spectrum of politics and the public has access to all of them.
The government should never have a say in how the free press operates. Once they get involved the free press ceases to exist. Any threat to the free press hinders its ability to operate as a free press.
It can be political, but it can't dress up as impartial while doing it.
I have no issue with MSNBC being a liberal rag, what I have an issue with is them claiming they are not.
He then proceeded to assign some well-deserved blame to the likes of Fox News specifically, saying, "If you watch Fox News on a regular basis...they will find folks who make me mad. I don't know where they find them."
After referencing to the way Fox News magnified the "Obamaphone," he called them out for rarely showing stories about the waitress with two kids who is struggling to get by but playing by all the rules.
