Trump's answer upon hearing the totalitarian Mullahcracy steps up executions of young women

[GRIZZ0317]

I found some media from India that reported on the court proceedings. You don't have the first clue about what you speak.


Nope, we have laws protecting that activity. The behavior the folks in Iran were doing was explicitly against their laws.

Can you post a link to that media. I'll gladly eat crow if I'm wrong. Either way I don't think it was a good response to the question.

 

[MisterBeale]

Can you post a link to that media. I'll gladly eat crow if I'm wrong. Either way I don't think it was a good response to the question.

Post in thread 'The Iranian Regime is going to execute the "FIRST" (LOL) woman protester.'

Wednesday at 9:59 PM

Why are you working so hard to defend the Iranian Regime MisterBeale? The news release I posted has been picked up by every major news organization AS YOU WELL KNOW. Quite hiding behind dumb memes, and state what you want to say.

First. . . I am NOT defending the Iranian regime by pointing out war propaganda. The way it is worded, and the sourcing, indicates its only purpose is to make folks want WAR!!!! War propaganda manipulates emotion, it does not rely on facts.

When we look at the facts, it appears to just be this totalitarian regime trying to protect itself. I'm not...

• MisterBeale

• 
• 

 

[Doc7505]

I'm not sure how it is the business of Americans on how the Iranian government deals with its criminals.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
At this point it has become our business.
Are these men and now women really the criminals?
Are they patriots looking to be free, or truly criminals?
The way Iran handles its criminals can have broader implications for international relations, including:
Trust in Diplomatic Engagements: If Iran is perceived as not adhering to international norms, it can hinder diplomatic efforts.
Regional Stability: Iran's internal policies can affect its relationships with neighboring countries and influence regional conflicts.

 

[Doc7505]

I presume Pope Leo will ignore this reference.

REPORTER: Iran is going to execute four more protesters, including the first woman protester. What do you tell Iran?

TRUMP: Tell that to the Pope. pic.twitter.com/K3jTlaMVX0— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) April 16, 2026

<~~~~~~~~~~>

 

[MarathonMike]

I presume Pope Leo will ignore this reference.

REPORTER: Iran is going to execute four more protesters, including the first woman protester. What do you tell Iran?

TRUMP: Tell that to the Pope. pic.twitter.com/K3jTlaMVX0— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) April 16, 2026

Pope Leo is awaiting instructions from the Democratic Party on how to respond.

 

[Anathema]

If we are supposedly NOT interested in regime change, then their treatment of women is a non-issue so far as I’m concerned.

If we ARE interested in changing the political atmosphere of Iran then I’ll say that I believe Iran treats women far more appropriately (not nicely) than we treat our women here in the west.

 

[MisterBeale]

<~~~~~~~~~~>
At this point it has become our business.
Are these men and now women really the criminals?
Are they patriots looking to be free, or truly criminals?
The way Iran handles its criminals can have broader implications for international relations, including:
Trust in Diplomatic Engagements: If Iran is perceived as not adhering to international norms, it can hinder diplomatic efforts.
Regional Stability: Iran's internal policies can affect its relationships with neighboring countries and influence regional conflicts.

When Benedict Arnold betrayed our cause, we would have put him to death had Washington caught him.
We used to put traitors to death all the way up to the 20th century.



I'm not sure how them putting to death agitators that are working with our CIA and Mossad is much different TBH.

 

[MisterBeale]

Trust in Diplomatic Engagements: If Iran is perceived as not adhering to international norms, it can hinder diplomatic efforts.

Assassinating diplomats and leaders not involved in a battle has long been against international norms for centuries.

When Israel bombed and killed folks involved in diplomacy, that made this argument irrelevant & a joke.

 

[GRIZZ0317]

Post in thread 'The Iranian Regime is going to execute the "FIRST" (LOL) woman protester.'

Wednesday at 9:59 PM

Why are you working so hard to defend the Iranian Regime MisterBeale? The news release I posted has been picked up by every major news organization AS YOU WELL KNOW. Quite hiding behind dumb memes, and state what you want to say.

First. . . I am NOT defending the Iranian regime by pointing out war propaganda. The way it is worded, and the sourcing, indicates its only purpose is to make folks want WAR!!!! War propaganda manipulates emotion, it does not rely on facts.

When we look at the facts, it appears to just be this totalitarian regime trying to protect itself. I'm not...

• MisterBeale

• 
• 

Thanks for sharing that, still seems like overkill. I know your position is their country their laws, I think its bullshit they're being sentenced to death. However I don't know as there's anything the U.S could even do to help. Like I said earlier though, the presidents response to the question was lacking, and kind of reminded me of 3rd grade fights.

 

[MisterBeale]

I think its bullshit they're being sentenced to death.

I do too.

The point here, is it is their nation, their laws, and their sovereignty. Using as an excuse that we don't like how they run their nation as an excuse for war is just as much bullshit.

Far more innocents would die in a war than we believe are being unjustly put to death. Governments, no matter where, don't really care about people, they just use them as an excuse to act more authoritarian.



If folks take this to its logical conclusion, then the entire planet could declare war on America for our allowing citizens to be armed.
Only a handful of other nations allow their citizens to own guns, and the hurdle for them to be armed is much higher than it is here.

I'm willing to bet far more people die of gun violence than Iran has killed by being oppressive, I have no doubt. But our nation has made the decision that an armed population is the only security of liberty. Their nation has decided that an oppressive theocracy is the only guarantee of public morality.

 

[LeftofLeft]

No I don't, but they do.

Iran is NOT a liberal democracy. There are laws on the books in Russia, China, Cube etc. that I definitely don't agree with.

It is not my business what laws other nations have, or how those laws are enforced.

All the folks you are whining about, Iran claims broke their laws. I am pretty sure they knew what those laws were when they broke them.


Not my circus, not my monkey.

IDGF.


(btw, those so called "estimates," are about as accurate as the Nayirah testimony. It's just throwing more babies from incubators onto the floor.)

Based on your logic, the rest of the world needs to keep its nose out of US Laws and how the US enforces it.

Follow your own logic and don’t be exposed for being full of shit.

 

[MisterBeale]

Based on your logic, the rest of the world needs to keep its nose out of US Laws and how the US enforces it.

Yup, that is the point. No one but Americans should be in charge of Americans business and how we enforce our own laws.

Follow your own logic and don’t be exposed for being full of shit.

How does that make me full of shit? You aren't making sense.

 

[j-mac]

About what? The supposed humanitarian violations of the Iranians? I would very much be intrigued to be proved wrong, please post some video or photos of such an incident.

About the century old American character? Again, if you have proof and something to show how I am naive, please, post it.

Otherwise, I will take your comment for precisely what it is.

So, just so I’m clear, you’re saying that Iran did not, and is not killing its citizens? Is that right?

 

[Leo123]

No I don't, but they do.

Iran is NOT a liberal democracy. There are laws on the books in Russia, China, Cube etc. that I definitely don't agree with.

It is not my business what laws other nations have, or how those laws are enforced.

All the folks you are whining about, Iran claims broke their laws. I am pretty sure they knew what those laws were when they broke them.


Not my circus, not my monkey.

IDGF.


(btw, those so called "estimates," are about as accurate as the Nayirah testimony. It's just throwing more babies from incubators onto the floor.)

The laws in Iran are not of the Iranian people they are from the invasion of Islam and the Islamic Mullahs. That regime has been threatening America and Americans since they gained power in 1979 and have supported terrorists and terrorist proxies that have killed Americans. Trump will eradicate them and free the Iranians anyway. But, you don't care I guess. Where do you live?

 

[MisterBeale]

So, just so I’m clear, you’re saying that Iran did not, and is not killing its citizens? Is that right?

Nope, that is not what I am saying.

What I'm saying is that Iran is merely enforcing its laws against protest and rioting. It is also enforcing its espionage laws.

There was a time when espionage was punishable by death in this nation.


I guess I am not seeing why folks think it is any nation's business other than Iran what laws they make and how they enforce them.

The folks that are being executed and sanctioned presumably knew the law, but broke the law anyway.

 

[MisterBeale]

The laws in Iran are not of the Iranian people they are from the invasion of Islam and the Islamic Mullahs.

Presumably, the same could be said of China, N. Korea, Cube, etc.

The leaders and laws in those nations are not made through popular consent either.

Just because we don't like how another nation functions does not give us the right to go to war over it. The Soviets used to do that shit, they felt they were entitled to bring about global revolution.

This commie/Trotskyite bullshit is what you are advocating. No thanks.

 

[MisterBeale]

Where do you live?

 

[justoffal]

He should send in the Swiss Guard to rescue them. The Pope (as we say here in the West) is "all hat and no cattle." Bless his heart.

He also borrowed your name without permission!

 

[Leo123]

Presumably, the same could be said of China, N. Korea, Cube, etc.

The leaders and laws in those nations are not made through popular consent either.

Just because we don't like how another nation functions does not give us the right to go to war over it. The Soviets used to do that shit, they felt they were entitled to bring about global revolution.

This commie/Trotskyite bullshit is what you are advocating. No thanks.

What I highlighted in red in your quote shows you either did not read my post, are just playing games and nit picking, or you're just stupid.

 

[MisterBeale]

My explanation when way over your head, try again.

Nope, I trampled your totally ridiculous war propaganda argument under my feet.