Trump withdrawals the United States from 66 international organizations

[1srelluc]

Dupe

Thread 'Trump withdrawals the United States from 66 international organizations'

Jan 8, 2026

Technical Difficulties

Withdrawing the United States from International Organizations, Conventions, and Treaties that Are Contrary to the Interests of the United States

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United

www.whitehouse.gov

Looks like half are UN .orgs.....I wonder how much money that will save?

This is what i voted for but I wish congress had the political fortitude to make laws where this kind of spending has to be made into...

• 1srelluc
• Replies: 82
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 
• 

 

[Crepitus]

What I voted for.

MAGA!

President Trump on Wednesday announced plans to withdraw the U.S. from dozens of global organizations, including the United Nations climate change agencies.​

​

Why it matters: It's among the biggest and most extreme steps this administration has taken to retreat from the global stage and pull back foreign spending.​

​

Legal experts immediately questioned whether Trump's move is legal, though the existence of laws hasn't stopped other moves of his.​

​

Between the lines: At the highest level, these moves might feel shocking, but they shouldn't be surprising.​

​

It can take a while — in this case, almost a year — to turn completely around a government bureaucracy as big as the United States'.​

​

Driving the news: Trump's memoranda to executive departments and agencies said that after consulting with his Cabinet, he "determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United States to remain a member of, participate in, or otherwise provide support to" the organizations.​

​

Among the nearly 70 groups included were the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the foundation of most other global climate work, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which regularly assesses climate science.​

The Trump administration was essentially absent from the United Nations climate talks in Brazil last November, so the writing was on the wall.​

​

Reality check: The UNFCCC is a Senate-ratified treaty — which occurred in 1992 and signed by Republican President George H. W. Bush.​

​

What they're saying: "Whether a president can unilaterally withdraw the U.S. from a Senate-ratified treaty is an open legal question," Columbia University law professor Michael Gerrard wrote on LinkedIn.​

​

The U.S. would become the only one of the 193 member states of the UN not to be in the UNFCCC. Thus the U.S. would have no vote in further decisions, though future presidents could send observers," Gerrard wrote.​

​

...​

https://www.axios.com/2026/01/08/trump-withdraws-international-organizations-un-climate

If you voted for that then you're an idiot.

 

[1srelluc]

Once I got my Bing-fu straightened out the totals are staggering.

Trump just basically defunded the UN.

 

[Anarchy666]

Everyone who hates this country should be deported to the country of their preference, including Zionists.

 

[Dr Grump]

America is leading the capitalist free world again

Yee haw Gomer!

 

[jknowgood]

If you voted for that then you're an idiot.

We cannot control the climate.

 

[Cassandro]

The UN is a nest of spies and grifters. It should be moved to Kaliningrad. The US should not be footing the bill for this corrupt organization.

 

[Crepitus]

We cannot control the climate.

Izzat supposed to be a joke?

 

[PK1]

The IPCC isn't just useless, it is an enemy of America.

IPCC should be hunted down and put in a Nuremberg style trial.

You obviously never read any of the IPCC reports and/or are clueless about scientific methodology.
If you are that ignorant, and people agree with you, we as a society have a lot of intellectual problems for a nation with vast educational opportunities.

 

[Nostra]

You obviously never read any of the IPCC reports and/or are clueless about scientific methodology.
If you are that ignorant, and people agree with you, we as a society have a lot of intellectual problems for a nation with vast educational opportunities.

100% frauds.

 

[Nobody911]

No shocker there! Like I said before, it's 1984, not 2026. So, you can bet we're gonna see all sorts of dystopian tales popping up all over the world, especially in the US.

Similarities to the pre‑WWII era: rising great‑power competition, weakened multilateral institutions, regional rivalries, and nationalist politics echo some pre‑1945 patterns.

Short-term warning signs to watch (signal rising geopolitical risk)

1. Major treaty exits finalized — withdrawals from key arms‑control, security, or trade treaties taking legal effect.
2. Rapid alliance fracturing — public disputes or treaty‑level disagreements among core allies (e.g., NATO members openly splitting on collective defense).
3. Sharp increases in military incidents — air/sea encounters, border skirmishes, or naval buildups between major powers or their proxies.
4. Large-scale economic decoupling — fast, formal trade/tech blocs with wide sanctions or export controls that cut off supply chains.
5. Acceleration of arms races — rapid deployment of new nuclear, hypersonic, or space weapons and withdrawal from arms‑control oversight.
6. Widespread cyberattacks on civilian infrastructure — major, sustained outages attributed to state actors causing civilian harm.
7. Humanitarian system collapse — UN agencies or major NGOs forced to halt large programs due to funding/expulsion.
8. Mass refugee flows across multiple regions — large, sustained displacement from conflict zones overwhelming regional capacities.
9. Authoritarian regional alignments — formation of prominent blocs led by revisionist powers openly challenging existing norms.
10. Domestic political breakdowns in major states — coups, rapid delegitimization of central governments, or widescale unrest in key countries.

Practical short-term actions for individuals

• Monitor reputable international news and expert briefs.
• Keep emergency plans and essential supplies for short disruptions.
• Support and engage with civic groups that back democratic institutions and humanitarian aid.
• Contact representatives to express concern about de‑escalation and multilateral engagement.

 

[Darlo kittu]

No shocker there! Like I said before, it's 1984, not 2026. So, you can bet we're gonna see all sorts of dystopian tales popping up all over the world, especially in the US.

View attachment 1203265

Similarities to the pre‑WWII era: rising great‑power competition, weakened multilateral institutions, regional rivalries, and nationalist politics echo some pre‑1945 patterns.

Short-term warning signs to watch (signal rising geopolitical risk)

1. Major treaty exits finalized — withdrawals from key arms‑control, security, or trade treaties taking legal effect.
2. Rapid alliance fracturing — public disputes or treaty‑level disagreements among core allies (e.g., NATO members openly splitting on collective defense).
3. Sharp increases in military incidents — air/sea encounters, border skirmishes, or naval buildups between major powers or their proxies.
4. Large-scale economic decoupling — fast, formal trade/tech blocs with wide sanctions or export controls that cut off supply chains.
5. Acceleration of arms races — rapid deployment of new nuclear, hypersonic, or space weapons and withdrawal from arms‑control oversight.
6. Widespread cyberattacks on civilian infrastructure — major, sustained outages attributed to state actors causing civilian harm.
7. Humanitarian system collapse — UN agencies or major NGOs forced to halt large programs due to funding/expulsion.
8. Mass refugee flows across multiple regions — large, sustained displacement from conflict zones overwhelming regional capacities.
9. Authoritarian regional alignments — formation of prominent blocs led by revisionist powers openly challenging existing norms.
10. Domestic political breakdowns in major states — coups, rapid delegitimization of central governments, or widescale unrest in key countries.

Practical short-term actions for individuals

• Monitor reputable international news and expert briefs.
• Keep emergency plans and essential supplies for short disruptions.
• Support and engage with civic groups that back democratic institutions and humanitarian aid.
• Contact representatives to express concern about de‑escalation and multilateral engagement.

More of the same over the top mouth frothing hysteria the left has perfected.

I remember the Democrats and liberal media screaming Reagan would start WWIII with the Soviet Union

Tds may be approaching Stage 6

 

[EMH]

You obviously never read any of the IPCC reports and/or are clueless about scientific methodology.
If you are that ignorant, and people agree with you, we as a society have a lot of intellectual problems for a nation with vast educational opportunities.

These should be the first questions at the tribunal, which your IPCC heroes cannot answer without admitting CO2 is not the cause of Earth climate change...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

 

[jknowgood]

Izzat supposed to be a joke?

Not at all, there is going to be an investigation and I'm sure you loons will find a reason to put him on trial. I mean you loons took outdated mistomenors and turned them into felonies somehow.

 

[Darlo kittu]

Al Gore was at a "climate change " gathering and screamed the oceans are boiling

Can anyone tell me where?

It is not climate change

It is not global warming

It is not called global cooling

It is called THE WEATHER

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[Crepitus]

Not at all, there is going to be an investigation and I'm sure you loons will find a reason to put him on trial. I mean you loons took outdated mistomenors and turned them into felonies somehow.

WTF are you babbling about this time?

 

[Etymology gaslight]

These should be the first questions at the tribunal, which your IPCC heroes cannot answer without admitting CO2 is not the cause of Earth climate change...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

I think some climate change is somewhat political.

 

[MarathonMike]

Yee haw Gomer!

Does a strong America upset you?

 

[Darlo kittu]

Does a strong America upset you?

I do not believe so. However he strong breath and body odor are very repellent