Trump Wins At SCOTUS...Constitutional Prejections Remain!

[Billiejeens]

Trumpers will not like the decision because it holds that Trump is not above the law.

When you make complete dumbass comments like that, it shows that you are an idiot.
Even if you miraculously make a comment that makes sense in the future, no one will care.

 

[Billiejeens]

The Orange Shit Gibbon lost his attempt to hide his Tax Records from the Manhattan D.A. In a 7-2 Decision (Majority Decision written CJ Roberts) the court held,

“In our judicial system, ‘the public has a right to every man’s evidence.’ Since the earliest days of the Republic, ‘every man’ has included the President of the United States,” Roberts wrote.

Supreme Court says Manhattan DA can get Trump's tax records, but rejects bid by House Democrats

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered split opinions in two cases over whether President Donald Trump can shield his tax records from investigators, handing a win to the Manhattan district attorney but rejecting parallel efforts by Democrats in the House of Representatives.

www.cnbc.com

.

The Supreme Court on Thursday voted 7-2 against President Donald Trump in a case over whether he could shield his tax records from the Manhattan district attorney.

Chief Justice John Roberts authored the court’s opinion, which was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch wrote separately to explain their votes with the majority. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

You may not understand the ruling.

 

[Billiejeens]

Roberts comes through again.

It wasn't just Roberts it was also Gorsuch and Kavenaugh that found Trump must release his tax returns. Expect a Trump twitter rant soon.

You 2 may not understand the ruling

 

[Billiejeens]

Democrats didn't gain a thing. Good luck with that.

They lost the battle, but they won -
Wait, they didn't win anything

 

[Billiejeens]

Democrats didn't gain a thing. Good luck with that.

They lost the battle, but they won -
Wait, they didn't win anything

Laugh away
You clearly are clueless .

 

[meaner gene]

The SC punted it back to the lower courts, where, if I'm not mistaken, Trumpybear has lost most of the time.

but Trump can force a return to SCOTUS

Only if he can come up with a "new" argument. All previous arguments were shot down by the lower courts and upheld by the USSC.

Any new arguments would be guided by previous USSC and Circuit court decisions as applied to normal people, in other words existing case law, which is well settled when it comes to ordinary individuals.

 

[Billiejeens]

The SC punted it back to the lower courts, where, if I'm not mistaken, Trumpybear has lost most of the time.

but Trump can force a return to SCOTUS

Only if he can come up with a "new" argument. All previous arguments were shot down by the lower courts and upheld by the USSC.

Any new arguments would be guided by previous USSC and Circuit court decisions as applied to normal people, in other words existing case law, which is well settled when it comes to ordinary individuals.

How long would you expect that process to last?

 

[Billiejeens]

Why do they want his tax returns?

Every other attempt at a coup has failed.

 

[meaner gene]

Only if he can come up with a "new" argument. All previous arguments were shot down by the lower courts and upheld by the USSC.

Any new arguments would be guided by previous USSC and Circuit court decisions as applied to normal people, in other words existing case law, which is well settled when it comes to ordinary individuals.

How long would you expect that process to last?

In the Cy Vance (NY DA) case, the first of two cases handed down. It would take as long as any normal court docket. Right now the accountants / banks have to obey the grand jury subpoenas served them within the original time limits set in them. And for which they raised no original objection to.

Any delay would have to be by motion giving new reasons, limited to exiting recognized case law, which Trump already lost.

But Trump could file a motion to invalidate the subpoena just like he did before losing at the district court, and the circuit court and then at the USSC. But would just take until the next motion hearing to throw it out.

In short, Trump has no better argument to stop the release of those records to the grand jury, than you or I have. And its only a matter of administrative delays, ex: transfer of paperwork from USSC to circuit court to district court.

 

[Billiejeens]

Only if he can come up with a "new" argument. All previous arguments were shot down by the lower courts and upheld by the USSC.

Any new arguments would be guided by previous USSC and Circuit court decisions as applied to normal people, in other words existing case law, which is well settled when it comes to ordinary individuals.

How long would you expect that process to last?

In the Cy Vance (NY DA) case, the first of two cases handed down. It would take as long as any normal court docket. Right now the accountants / banks have to obey the grand jury subpoenas served them within the original time limits set in them. And for which they raised no original objection to.

Any delay would have to be by motion giving new reasons, limited to exiting recognized case law, which Trump already lost.

But Trump could file a motion to invalidate the subpoena just like he did before losing at the district court, and the circuit court and then at the USSC. But would just take until the next motion hearing to throw it out.

In short, Trump has no better argument to stop the release of those records to the grand jury, than you or I have. And its only a matter of administrative delays, ex: transfer of paperwork from USSC to circuit court to district court.

The answer is
Before election
After election

Choose 1

 

[meaner gene]

The answer is
Before election
After election

Choose 1

Cy Vance, well before the election. But as grand jury evidence they would remain sealed.

In the congress case, it's remanded back to the district court with new guide lines, which means that process starts all over again, so that can easily be stalled until after the election. But congress would be permitted to release the papers publicly.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Just think if Biden wins in November, we will finally find out how a politician becomes a multi millionare

Oh yeah? Biden released his tax returns. Knock yourself out.

He didn't releash all his tax records. Now he will. See why he chooses china over the united states.

As opposed to none. See if you can spot the difference.

I see you have your 'spiracy hat on. So what is Trump hiding?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The answer is
Before election
After election

So instead of exonerating himself, trump will go into the election with everyone wondering what he is hiding.

 

[meaner gene]

The answer is
Before election
After election

So instead of exonerating himself, trump will go into the election with everyone wondering what he is hiding.

Even worse is that when Cy Vance gets the subpoenaed documents, he might announce that Trump and or a Trump associate is under criminal investigation or indictment.

 

[playtime]

ummm....


Cuomo Signs a Bill to Allow Release of Trump’s State Tax Returns
State tax officials will be required to release the returns for any ‘specified and legitimate legislative purpose’ to three congressional committees.
By Jesse McKinley and Nicholas Fandos

• July 8, 2019
  

As the battle over President Trump’s federal taxes intensifies in Washington, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York signed a bill on Monday to allow congressional committees to access the president’s state tax returns.
The new law requires state tax officials to release the president’s state returns for any “specified and legitimate legislative purpose” on the request of the chair of one of three congressional committees: the House Ways and Means Committee, [ chaired by maxine waters ] the Senate Finance Committee and the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Cuomo Signs a Bill to Allow Release of Trump’s State Tax Returns

 

[Billiejeens]

The answer is
Before election
After election

Choose 1

Cy Vance, well before the election. But as grand jury evidence they would remain sealed.

In the congress case, it's remanded back to the district court with new guide lines, which means that process starts all over again, so that can easily be stalled until after the election. But congress would be permitted to release the papers publicly.

No chance with CY - before the election
Also no chance that it stays sealed after - He is a Democrat

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The answer is
Before election
After election

So instead of exonerating himself, trump will go into the election with everyone wondering what he is hiding.

Even worse is that when Cy Vance gets the subpoenaed documents, he might announce that Trump and or a Trump associate is under criminal investigation or indictment.

They are likely sealing the indictments of the President, to stop the clock on them.

 

[Billiejeens]

ummm....


Cuomo Signs a Bill to Allow Release of Trump’s State Tax Returns
State tax officials will be required to release the returns for any ‘specified and legitimate legislative purpose’ to three congressional committees.
By Jesse McKinley and Nicholas Fandos

• July 8, 2019

As the battle over President Trump’s federal taxes intensifies in Washington, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York signed a bill on Monday to allow congressional committees to access the president’s state tax returns.
The new law requires state tax officials to release the president’s state returns for any “specified and legitimate legislative purpose” on the request of the chair of one of three congressional committees: the House Ways and Means Committee, [ chaired by maxine waters ] the Senate Finance Committee and the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Cuomo Signs a Bill to Allow Release of Trump’s State Tax Returns

Have you been in a come for almost a year?

They have already demonstrated that they do not have a specific and legitimate purpose - to this point.

Dismissed in 2019
I dismiss you again.

 

[Billiejeens]

The answer is
Before election
After election

So instead of exonerating himself, trump will go into the election with everyone wondering what he is hiding.

I laugh

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The answer is
Before election
After election

So instead of exonerating himself, trump will go into the election with everyone wondering what he is hiding.

I laugh

Sure, you're in the cult