Trump — We’re going to look into Ashli Babbitt case.

That’s all. I said? Are you that stupid?
Pretty much. You are discounting asking any questions...


You keep “wondering ” why Byrd didn’t have a tazer on him but can’t respond to my response

I asked if you know what equipment a plain clothes CP Lieutenant is outfitted with .
I don't know what officers carry on their person normally. However, other options and personnel were available but were not allowed to be used.
You just keep asking why he didn’t have a tazer as if you somehow know he should have. Why? Have you ever seen a Police Lieutenant in plain clothes with a tazer?

A taser or tear gas, both would have been tools they could have used to stop the riot, but were not allowed.

And why would you think a tazer would have been an effective deterrent? If he has tazed Ashes there would have been nothing to stop the next attacker coming through that blown out window… or the next one or the next one.

so, fire tear gas through the hole...that would have stopped them too.

The SHOCK of that gun firing stopped that attack cold. A tazer would likely not had the same effect and you “seem” smart enough to know that.

I said a taser would have stopped HER. We don't know know what the rest of them would have done, but you lob 2 cannisters if chemical repellant through the windows, thay would have made them retreat
So just stop

You have failed and embarrassed yourself and impugned your honesty

I haven't failed at anything, not have i embarrassed myself. I'm the only one here trying to be reasonable by admitting they were wrong, but asking why there weren't other options.

You are the one getting mad because I'm asking those questions.

Don't know what to tell ya..
 
Pretty much. You are discounting asking any questions...



I don't know what officers carry on their person normally. However, other options and personnel were available but were not allowed to be used.


A taser or tear gas, both would have been tools they could have used to stop the riot, but were not allowed.



so, fire tear gas through the hole...that would have stopped them too.



I said a taser would have stopped HER. We don't know know what the rest of them would have done, but you lob 2 cannisters if chemical repellant through the windows, thay would have made them retreat


I haven't failed at anything, not have i embarrassed myself. I'm the only one here trying to be reasonable by admitting they were wrong, but asking why there weren't other options.

You are the one getting mad because I'm asking those questions.

Don't know what to tell ya..
You just keep repeating your stupidity

You infer that Byrd should have had a tazer yet you have no idea if a plainclothes CP Lieutenant would ever HAVE a tazer on him .

You are a dishonest joke
 
You just keep repeating your stupidity

You infer that Byrd should have had a tazer yet you have no idea if a plainclothes CP Lieutenant would ever HAVE a tazer on him .

You are a dishonest joke

I never said they would have a taser or tear gas ON them,, it's possible, I'm sure some do, ( a taser) I said they should have been made available TO them. I'm sure there is an armory in the Capitol building...or somewhere nearby.

I'm not dishonest at all. I can't help it you don't like people asking questions 🤷‍♂️
 
I never said they would have a taser or tear gas ON them,, it's possible, I'm sure some do, ( a taser) I said they should have been made available TO them. I'm sure there is an armory in the Capitol building...or somewhere nearby.

I'm not dishonest at all. I can't help it you don't like people asking questions 🤷‍♂️
Oh bullshit. You’re completely dishonest

Your last post doesn’t even make sense
 
Last edited:
so, you can't read either

"Law enforcement and correctional officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, "
Post the rest of that sentence ya dishonest prick. It goes on to say unless it is used to protect an individual or group
 
Yes, that was part of the Lesh doctine: Unarmed woman, violent mob, breached barricade, innocents behind you - shoot to kill.
“Innocents behind you”?

Who were these innocents? The assholes who smashed in those windows? The ones who were beating cops all day?

Fuck off
 
Post the rest of that sentence ya dishonest prick. It goes on to say unless it is used to protect an individual or group
to protect an individual or group
how far away where those other individuals and groups?

were THEY in eminent danger?

stop being a jack ass.

he had no reason to shoot.
 
“Innocents behind you”?

Who were these innocents? The assholes who smashed in those windows? The ones who were beating cops all day?
Behind your hero byrd. At least try and keep up
Brilliant analysis. Work that one out all by yourself or did your have help?
 
how far away where those other individuals and groups?

were THEY in eminent danger?

stop being a jack ass.

he had no reason to shoot.
How far away was Congress? The doors to the House Chamber were in the video in which Ashes got shot.

Yes they were in imminent danger from a mob that had hospitalized dozens of cops to get there.
 
1743457795779.webp
 
Oh bullshit. You’re completely dishonest

Your last post doesn’t even make sense

OK, you've said I'm dishonest, more than a couple of times. Please tell me...where have I been dishonest?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom