Trump wants Greenland's Lithium deposits. The deal maker is always thinking.

Once again, based on some of the comments, we deserve to lose the US.

I see you are part of the 70 IQ crowd who don't see that maybe part of fixing some of this country's problems might INCLUDE investing in the growth of the country.
Or maybe you just don't know that territorial USA lacks several vital key resources needed to stay healthy in today's world with an ever-expanding China.

But you go right on ripping on Trump as if you actually think you were better off with Biden or Harris who helped orchestrate the mess.
 
Once again, based on some of the comments, we deserve to lose the US. But anyway, I'll let you all get back to your cheerleading. :lol:


Ggtm-L2t-Wg-AEv2fv.jpg
And we're sorry to hear komrade that your paycheck from Xi Jinping of Beijing has been delayed in the mails.
 
I see you are part of the 70 IQ crowd who don't see that maybe part of fixing some of this country's problems might INCLUDE investing in the growth of the country.
Or maybe you just don't know that territorial USA lacks several vital key resources needed to stay healthy in today's world with an ever-expanding China.

But you go right on ripping on Trump as if you actually think you were better off with Biden or Harris who helped orchestrate the mess.

Believe what you want. It might take a while, but you'll see eventually who the dummy is. And I don't know if you have a short memory or if you're being dishonest, but I told you a few days ago on another thread, I'm not a Dem. I thought you were smarter than to think in such a binary way. I would say the same thing no matter who proposed this idea, which is exactly what the globalists and technocrats have wanted for a long time. Nice try but not everyone has that partisan hack football mentality.
 
Last edited:
Well, China and Russia ARE the two key elements in BRICS, right?
Yup!
Another layer of the threats developing.
......
BRICS is an intergovernmental organization consisting of ten countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. It is considered to be a counterpart and alternative to the G7 bloc of the world's largest economies.

The term 'BRIC' was originally identified to highlight investment opportunities.[2] The grouping later evolved into a geopolitical and geoeconomic bloc,[3] with their governments meeting annually at formal summits and coordinating multilateral policies since the founding countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China held the first leaders summit in Russia in 2009 under the name BRIC. Relations among BRICS are conducted mainly based on non-interference, equality, and mutual benefit.[4]
......
On 24 October 2024, an additional 13 countries, namely Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Uzbekistan and Vietnam, were invited to participate as "partner countries".[62] The partner status would allow these countries to engage with and benefit from BRICS initiatives.[63] It is unclear whether the countries in this tier have received official membership invitations.[64]

2025 expansion​

On 6 January 2025, Indonesia joined BRICS officially as a full member,[65] making it the first Southeast Asian state to join the bloc, as well as the 10th member of BRICS. Jakarta's bid got the green light from the bloc in 2023, but the Southeast Asian country asked to join following the presidential election held in 2024.[8] 2025's BRICS presidency leader and Brazil's Lula announced their official entry.

Statistics​

Currently, the group is dominated by China, which has about 70% of the organization's total GDP.[3] Brazil, India, and China are among the world's ten largest countries by population, area, and gross domestic product (GDP, nominal and PPP). All five initial member states are members of the G20, with a combined nominal GDP of US$28 trillion (about 27% of the gross world product), a total GDP (PPP) of around US$65 trillion (35% of global GDP PPP), and an estimated US$5.2 trillion in combined foreign reserves (as of 2024).[66][non-primary source needed]

BRICS+ accounts for 46% of the world's population.[67] BRICS+ share of world GDP at purchasing power parity (PPP) is 35.6% in 2022.[67] China dominates the BRICS+ accounting for 52% of its total GDP (at PPP).[67] In 2024 the informality rate was 62% while the labour force participation was 60.8%.[68]
......

BTW, this alternative to "NATO" is trying it's best to undercut the USA Dollar as the international currency and replace it's use in international trade with the PRC/CCP China Yuan, of course given this is a Communist China dominated organization.

Which it looks like "buttercup" would like for the USA to lose to ... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
So we're in competition for resources ?

Now it's starting to make sense.....

~S~
 
Insanity to titillate the MAGA crowd. It is under NATO protection, of which we are a signatory member. He isn't going to attack NATO.
I wouldn't put it past him.

Trump refuses to rule out use of military force to take ...​

1736849150153.webp
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › trump-biden-offshore-dri...
6 days ago — (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and ...

All that anti-war talk?
Trump's cult will change their minds on a dime.
They will, as usual, turn themselves into pretzels, trying to justify Trump's behavior and actions.
 

........... It's more than just the lithium ...

Why Greenland is really about China​

....
President Trump raised eyebrows and set off a few alarms when he recently expressed interest in purchasing Greenland. But the real story underlying this interest is that China has long understood the relationship between commercial infrastructure projects and global power, and it has weaponized many of its commercial relationships. Washington has yet to develop a strategy to counter Beijing. President Trump reportedly became concerned when he learned about the extent of Chinese investments in this strategic island, which lies at a critical juncture in the North Atlantic, contains rare earth mineral deposits, and is home to a United States Air Force base that is central to American homeland defense architecture.

China has recognized the importance of Greenland since at least 2015, when its state enterprises began to invest in mining companies there. China has invested in at least four key mining operations in Greenland, adding to its dominant position in the rare earth element market. Rare earth elements have unique properties essential to high technology products. They are vital in critical defense applications like fighter jet engines, missile guidance systems, as well as satellite communications systems, not to mention mobile phone and electric car motors. While the United States could once rely on its own resources for rare earth minerals, it is now almost fully dependent on imports, mainly from China.

Chinese rare earth investments are just one example, close to American shores, of the broader Belt and Road Initiative announced in 2013. This trillion dollar effort is a sophisticated land and sea strategy designed to use physical projects such as railroads, ports, and mines to the advantage of Chinese business and military interests. These physical lodgments in turn will generate political advantages. The provision of loans, capital, equipment, and technical expertise shapes local politics and creates dependencies. The data generated from these projects adds “fuel” to Chinese artificial Intelligence objectives, since such technology requires large amounts of new data to refine its capabilities and applications such as facial recognition, which allows for greater social control.

Moreover, funding, building, and operating large infrastructure projects allows China to set standards that other international players must follow. Chinese acquisitions of commercial ports have shifted the development of global supply chains in favor of the mega ships operated by Chinese companies. Chinese infrastructure investments in Greenland and around the world are the equivalent of its technology investment strategies. For decades, China has implemented a technology transfer strategy that includes targeting American companies working on areas key to military applications like artificial intelligence and robotics. China combines this “venture investing” with an aggressive industrial espionage apparatus.

These are some examples of operating concepts central to the global commercial approach that Beijing has taken. Once implemented, these actions provide a foundation for Chinese influence and control below the level of overt military power. It is a form of 21st century strategic depth. The United States must do a much better job of integrating its capabilities to succeed in this competitive geopolitical landscape. We must develop our own strategic operating concepts and new models to counter authoritarian states that use their national resources to the advantage of their state enterprises, which then compete unfairly against Western businesses that must generate market returns for investors, and report on their activities under transparent legal and regulatory regimes.
....

Above an excerpt of the article, which I would recommend reading, as a starter.
So as usual, Trump’s the only one with his eye on the ball. Lefties screech “Why is Trump fixated with a barren wasteland?” Sometimes it seems like Trump is the only one with brains enough and courage enough to protect our country. This is why you elect highly successful businessmen. They are smarter than everybody else.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't put it past him.

Trump refuses to rule out use of military force to take ...

View attachment 1065404
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › trump-biden-offshore-dri...
6 days ago — (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and ...

All that anti-war talk?
Trump's cult will change their minds on a dime.
They will, as usual, turn themselves into pretzels, trying to justify Trump's behavior and actions.
The reference to military force came from the media;; not Trump.
 
I wouldn't put it past him.

Trump refuses to rule out use of military force to take ...

View attachment 1065404
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › trump-biden-offshore-dri...
6 days ago — (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and ...

All that anti-war talk?
Trump's cult will change their minds on a dime.
They will, as usual, turn themselves into pretzels, trying to justify Trump's behavior and actions.
He is already undermining it, he is the kind of arrogant bully who would dare the member nations to try and stop him from occupying it.

Delusional fucking idiot.
 
Trump could have ruled it out.........He didn't.


But the lying leftwing media makes it sound like Trump brought up the idea of military force when he didn't. He just answered a question "We won't rule anything out". It was a set-up gotcha question.

Leftwing media: "Mr. Trump, do you beat your wife?"
Trump: "Why do you ask stupid questions like that?"
Leftwing media headline: "TRUMP DOESN'T DENY BEATING HIS WIFE"
 
Greenland would make a spectacular international airport and space port.

Since we can't build fully automated super container shipping ports in America, maybe build in Greenland and then send smaller container ships to USA?
 
But the lying leftwing media makes it sound like Trump brought up the idea of military force when he didn't. He just answered a question "We won't rule anything out". It was a set-up gotcha question.

Leftwing media: "Mr. Trump, do you beat your wife?"
Trump: "Why do you ask stupid questions like that?"
Leftwing media headline: "TRUMP DOESN'T DENY BEATING HIS WIFE"

Yep.... That's exactly what they do. And they're back at it full time again with the 100% negative coverage... Only this time nobody cares.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom