Trump vs. Sanders or Clinton vs. Bush

[LeftofLeft]

What would be a better Presidential Race for America?

I could not agree with little or anything Bernie Sanders stands for policywise. But, I cannot think of any candidate from the other side with whom I have so much respect. He does not hide in the middle. He is explicitly going out and selling his platform to the U.S. as a Socialist.... and that's a good thing. If America is ready to become more Socialist, let's debate and vote on it.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I would prefer Beany & Cecil to Bush v Clinton.

I am against dynasties, and I have a very low threshold for boredom.

 

[nat4900]

I agree that Sanders is the MOST honest of all of these candidates.....but we should ALL know that there is a difference between the terms "socialist" and "democratic socialist"....and Sanders is certainly the latter.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

there is a difference between the terms "socialist" and "democratic socialist"

That doesn't make it better.

 

[JakeStarkey]

there is a difference between the terms "socialist" and "democratic socialist"

That doesn't make it better.

Of course that makes sense to be people who read and understand terms and definitions.

 

[Auld Phart]

I agree that Sanders is the MOST honest of all of these candidates.....but we should ALL know that there is a difference between the terms "socialist" and "democratic socialist"....and Sanders is certainly the latter.

there is a difference between the terms "socialist" and "democratic socialist"

There's a difference between a Fuji apple

and a Braeburn apple.

But not enough to make a difference

 

[JakeStarkey]

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

All progressive statists in America, those in both parties and independents, are democratic market socialists. They all believe in regulation: they only difference is just how much or how little regulation.

Are you a libertarian?

 

[Auld Phart]

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

All progressive statists in America, those in both parties and independents, are democratic market socialists. They all believe in regulation: they only difference is just how much or how little regulation.

Are you a libertarian?

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

Should I start yawning, or just go to sleep?

 

[JakeStarkey]

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

All progressive statists in America, those in both parties and independents, are democratic market socialists. They all believe in regulation: they only difference is just how much or how little regulation.

Are you a libertarian?

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

Should I start yawning, or just go to sleep?

Whatever floats your boat, since you can't offer anything of note.

 

[nat4900]

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

All progressive statists in America, those in both parties and independents, are democratic market socialists. They all believe in regulation: they only difference is just how much or how little regulation.

Are you a libertarian?

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

Should I start yawning, or just go to sleep?

Would it make ANY difference in your caliber of responses?

 

[Auld Phart]

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

All progressive statists in America, those in both parties and independents, are democratic market socialists. They all believe in regulation: they only difference is just how much or how little regulation.

Are you a libertarian?

WillHaftawaite is very poor at creating a fallacy of false equivalency.

Should I start yawning, or just go to sleep?

Whatever floats your boat, since you can't offer anything of note.

I compared apples to apples, not apples to oranges.

Should be easy enough

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's why you don't get the fallacy of false equivalency. That is one of the indicators who think education ability and intellect. If you don't get the difference, the issue is with you: you don't want to understand.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Wouldn't vote for any of them.

 

[Auld Phart]

That's why you don't get the fallacy of false equivalency. That is one of the indicators who think education ability and intellect. If you don't get the difference, the issue is with you: you don't want to understand.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Or listen to those who know better than you.

 

[Auld Phart]

Or listen to those who know better than you.

Right.


Met a lot of 'eggheads' that didn't know how to use a screwdriver, or even knew which end of the broom should hit the floor.

Memorizing fallacies doesn't make one smarter, just boring.

If you have a point, state it, don't quote a dictionary.

One of my favorite quotes is: 'Common sense isn't common'

and I've seen lots of proof of that.

 

[Redfish]

Hillary will be in jail or under indictment, so it won't be her. Bush will probably drop out in the next few months as his funding dries up.

Sanders is so old he may not live until next November.

My prediction is Trump vs Biden with Trump winning 70% of the vote.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Or listen to those who know better than you.

Right.


Met a lot of 'eggheads' that didn't know how to use a screwdriver, or even knew which end of the broom should hit the floor.

Memorizing fallacies doesn't make one smarter, just boring.

If you have a point, state it, don't quote a dictionary.

One of my favorite quotes is: 'Common sense isn't common'

and I've seen lots of proof of that.

Your immortal stubborness defines your issue. Your disregard of definitions terms and your use of fallacies clearly reveal the issue is with you.

 

[Auld Phart]

Or listen to those who know better than you.

Right.


Met a lot of 'eggheads' that didn't know how to use a screwdriver, or even knew which end of the broom should hit the floor.

Memorizing fallacies doesn't make one smarter, just boring.

If you have a point, state it, don't quote a dictionary.

One of my favorite quotes is: 'Common sense isn't common'

and I've seen lots of proof of that.

Your immortal stubborness defines your issue. Your disregard of definitions terms and your use of fallacies clearly reveal the issue is with you.

Your immortal stubborness defines your issue.

Yup, always have been stubborn, til proven wrong.

Your disregard of definitions terms and your use of fallacies clearly reveal the issue is with you

I'm frugal

Dont' care much for $50 words, when a $2 word would make more sense, and explain the situation better.

 

[JakeStarkey]

A refusal of one well trained in scientific procedures to accept terms and definitions indeed, verily, agrees with you that the problem is you.