Cocaine isn’t good for you, but the drug crisis comes from fentanyl (not meth). You’re trying to paint the intent to save the lives of Americans, but not a lot of Americans are dying from cocaine coming out of Venezuela. Most of it goes to Europe and you guys said it was taken care of anyway after they were shooting missiles at boats.
I think you are missing how DONE we, maga are, with our anti-American enemies. We have been letting these fucktards walk all over us for so long, that we are not that concerned about giving them... any consideration.
Trump feels like it is time to take out this one particular anti-American enemy, and my response is, "sounds good".
I don't really care why or how.
Quibbling about coke or meth, means nothing to me.
It hampers your narrative because you want people to conflate the many many many drug deaths with Maduro and it just isn’t factually true.
Anyone that hesitates to be ok with taking out an anti-American commie drug runner, is already lost to me.
Again, I don't care.
See, that’s me engaging honestly.
And I appreciate that. Keep that up for a decade or two, and if other lefties join in, maybe some day we can have real civil debates, on serious issues.
Until them, maga will keep moving forward, remaking the world in our image.
Your claim that we haven’t engaged honestly is false. Engaging with MAGA honestly doesn’t produce an honest response. MAGA lives in an alternate reality. You don’t have to believe anything you don’t want to believe. Just label something “TDS” and ignore it. Just say the information comes from “biased” people and ignore it.
Except i didn't do that. And to be clear, I didn't read you whole post and then go back. I am responding "in real time", so I didn't know that point was coming when I responded to your earlier points.
Thus, my behavior proves your accusation wrong.
The reality is that your side withdrew from engagement becasue a. you controlled the means of information and hoped to just shut us down and b. more and more you could not defend any of your ideas or policies.
Meanwhile anything you want to believe is fine. It doesn’t matter if your source of information is some rando on Facebook.
Hey it was your side, that produced generations of reporters and scientists and administrators who were full of a... fire to "make the world a better place" and "progress", and who put THEIR spin, into their professional content.
And by spin I mean lied their ******* asses off.
So, until those instituations are properly purged and rebuilt, I won't be trusting them.
Did you see the cnn attack on that independent reporter that broke the child care fraud story?
Her "fact checking" his story, constisted of calling up the accused and asking them if they were committing fraud.
I'm deadly serious. YOu can watch her making the phone calls.
The accused denied it. To her, that's equal to Shirly standing there, with a camera showing that the building is shut down during normal hours.
That is the way she presented it.
Whatever helps your narrative is all that matters and there’s just no way to engage that kind of mentality with honest and informed debate.
Except that's not true. As I just demonstrated.
www.nbcnews.com
